Una coppia decisamente strana e animata da secondi fini convince il dottor Grant a recarsi su Isla Sorna, ma ne conseguirà un atterraggio inaspettato e l'incontro con i nuovi paurosi abitant... Leggi tuttoUna coppia decisamente strana e animata da secondi fini convince il dottor Grant a recarsi su Isla Sorna, ma ne conseguirà un atterraggio inaspettato e l'incontro con i nuovi paurosi abitanti dell'isola.Una coppia decisamente strana e animata da secondi fini convince il dottor Grant a recarsi su Isla Sorna, ma ne conseguirà un atterraggio inaspettato e l'incontro con i nuovi paurosi abitanti dell'isola.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 5 vittorie e 16 candidature totali
Blake Michael Bryan
- Charlie
- (as Blake Bryan)
6,0363.8K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Jurassic Park III' offers thrilling dinosaur action and a welcome return of Sam Neill as Dr. Alan Grant, though it lacks a compelling plot and deep character development. The absence of Steven Spielberg is noted, with some missing the original's magic. Special effects receive mixed reviews, and the film's pacing is debated. Overall, it's an enjoyable yet flawed installment.
Recensioni in evidenza
Why did we have to return?
I will say this about Jurassic Park III, I'm at least glad it didn't overstay its welcome. But just the fact that it had such a short run time already tells you what you need to know.
Unlike the previous movie where the characters were incredibly dumb and sometimes annoying, the characters here were dumb but also kinda bland. There's really not a character I was really rooting for to survive. Thank goodness for Sam Neil fortunately because he was really the only one I truly cared for and actually tried to make smart character decisions throughout.
And the action had its moments but overall, it was honestly kind of forgettable. The Lost World might've had terrible characters but at least they did a better job at tension building and using the dinosaurs the correct way.
Overall if I were to rank the Jurassic movies, I'd honestly put this in D tier. It's just so unnecessary.
Unlike the previous movie where the characters were incredibly dumb and sometimes annoying, the characters here were dumb but also kinda bland. There's really not a character I was really rooting for to survive. Thank goodness for Sam Neil fortunately because he was really the only one I truly cared for and actually tried to make smart character decisions throughout.
And the action had its moments but overall, it was honestly kind of forgettable. The Lost World might've had terrible characters but at least they did a better job at tension building and using the dinosaurs the correct way.
Overall if I were to rank the Jurassic movies, I'd honestly put this in D tier. It's just so unnecessary.
JP3 is trash.
JP3 is easily the worst out of the 7 Jurassic movies. The plot is dumb, it's only 92 minutes long, and the T. Rex ( even though it's not Rexy ) dies. This movie is the only reason why I'd rather watch the Jurassic World movies over the Jurassic Park. I'd only watch this movie because Alan Grant is one of my favorite characters in the Jurassic series.
Adventure Without the Bite
"Jurassic Park III" delivers the familiar dinosaur thrills, but it feels like the magic and tension of the original are mostly missing. The film has some exciting action sequences and creative set pieces, yet the story is thin, and the characters lack depth, making it hard to fully engage with the stakes.
The pacing is uneven-certain scenes drag while others rush through key developments. The return to the island setting offers opportunities for suspense, but the plot often relies on predictable beats rather than clever surprises. The dinosaurs are still impressive visually, but they can't fully compensate for the lackluster storytelling.
Overall, "Jurassic Park III" is an average installment: fun in brief moments but forgettable compared to the first two films.
The pacing is uneven-certain scenes drag while others rush through key developments. The return to the island setting offers opportunities for suspense, but the plot often relies on predictable beats rather than clever surprises. The dinosaurs are still impressive visually, but they can't fully compensate for the lackluster storytelling.
Overall, "Jurassic Park III" is an average installment: fun in brief moments but forgettable compared to the first two films.
Jurassic Park III - Fast, Loud, and Shallow
Jurassic Park III is an energetic but ultimately underwhelming addition to the franchise. While it offers bursts of tension and impressive creature effects, it lacks the grandeur, thematic weight, and emotional engagement of the first two entries.
The film's strongest asset is undoubtedly the return of Dr. Alan Grant, played once again with stoic charm by Sam Neill. His presence adds a welcome thread of continuity and credibility. The introduction of the Spinosaurus provides a new apex predator, and the action sequences, especially the early crash and river chase, are well-executed and visually engaging.
However, the narrative is thin and feels like an afterthought. With a runtime barely surpassing 90 minutes, Jurassic Park III rushes through its plot with minimal character development and little room for emotional stakes. Supporting characters are largely forgettable, and the dialogue often borders on clunky.
What's missing most is the sense of awe and philosophical tension that made the original Jurassic Park feel monumental. Instead, this installment feels more like a creature feature with a blockbuster budget, a fun diversion, but not a meaningful continuation.
That said, it's not without merit. For fans who simply want dinosaurs, chaos, and a fast-paced survival story, it delivers. But for those seeking the world-building and moral complexity of its predecessors, it falls disappointingly short.
The film's strongest asset is undoubtedly the return of Dr. Alan Grant, played once again with stoic charm by Sam Neill. His presence adds a welcome thread of continuity and credibility. The introduction of the Spinosaurus provides a new apex predator, and the action sequences, especially the early crash and river chase, are well-executed and visually engaging.
However, the narrative is thin and feels like an afterthought. With a runtime barely surpassing 90 minutes, Jurassic Park III rushes through its plot with minimal character development and little room for emotional stakes. Supporting characters are largely forgettable, and the dialogue often borders on clunky.
What's missing most is the sense of awe and philosophical tension that made the original Jurassic Park feel monumental. Instead, this installment feels more like a creature feature with a blockbuster budget, a fun diversion, but not a meaningful continuation.
That said, it's not without merit. For fans who simply want dinosaurs, chaos, and a fast-paced survival story, it delivers. But for those seeking the world-building and moral complexity of its predecessors, it falls disappointingly short.
Not as good as the previous JP's.
Jurassic Park 3 was a shorter and less entertaining of the three. I thought this sequel might be good because JP2 was good but I was wrong! I have picked some notes while watching this movie. Usually Jurassic Park films are 2 hours long, this one is some 40 minutes less! and does not quite contain the same fun and horror it did on previous jp's. DR. Grant returns which is a suprise. It didn't have it's entertaining parts though i must admit. JP3 had amazing special effects, most probably the best out of the three. I have heard that Jurassic Park 4 will be released in 2004. Should I say this one will be a bad sequel as well?
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe effects crew used two hundred fifty gallons of oatmeal to simulate Spinosaur droppings.
- Blooper(at around 1h 2 mins) Although the depiction of the Pteranodon showcases several inaccuracies (such as having teeth, being able to grab things with their legs, and being excessively aggressive), which, being genetically engineered clones, can be explained, one detail still counts as an error. Namely, no matter how strong these creatures are, they could never lift up and carry a human boy the size of Eric. They would simply plummet towards the ground, since these animals needed to be extremely light-weight in order to stay aloft (a real-life Pteranodon would weigh less than preschool child). Thus the Pteranodon's anatomical inaccuracies notwithstanding, the sequence in question very nearly breaks the laws of physics.
- Curiosità sui creditiDuring the studio introductions, each logo is accompanied by the "ripple-in-the-water" effect and the sound of a heavy footstep.
- Versioni alternativeDon Davis, the music composer for the film, stated that roughly 20 seconds of footage was cut from the battle between the T-Rex and Spinosaurus. This was mostly made up of the two animals roaring at each other and sizing one another up.
- ConnessioniEdited into Supergator (2007)
- Colonne sonoreBig Hat, No Cattle
Written by Randy Newman
Performed by Randy Newman
Courtesy of Dreamworks Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Parque jurásico III
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 93.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 181.171.875 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 50.771.645 USD
- 22 lug 2001
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 368.780.809 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 32min(92 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti






