Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?
- Film per la TV
- 2001
- 45min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,4/10
1012
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaWere the Apollo moon landings faked?Were the Apollo moon landings faked?Were the Apollo moon landings faked?
Foto
Howard McCurdy
- Self - Space Historian, American University
- (as Howard McCurdy Ph.D.)
Paul N. Lazarus III
- Self - Producer, Capricorn One
- (as Paul Lazarus III)
Thomas Ronald Baron
- Self - Safety Inspector
- (filmato d'archivio)
Geoffrey Reeves
- Self - Space Physicist
- (as Dr. Geoffrey Reeves)
Gus Grissom
- Self - Astronaut
- (filmato d'archivio)
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniFeatured in MoonFaker: Exhibit A: Shadows (2007)
Recensione in evidenza
This so-called documentary does a poor job at presenting various possible viewpoints and misuses or ignores the applications of physical and optical laws. FOX could have done so much more with this interesting topic. This film only serves to hurt the credibility whether FOX is capable of producing a documentary.
Disjointed sequences of very short interview clips with only a handful of people present their opinions and analyses. No independent engineers or optical experts were consulted about the physics-related theories presented to provide additional insight.
The film tries and fails miserably to inspire the viewer to ask more questions than the film tries to answer. The intelligent viewer may learn that without a rudimentary understanding of physics, gravity, and optics one can easily "prove" just about anything.
There is lots of nice NASA footage, but nothing that can't be found in other well-written documentaries.
Disjointed sequences of very short interview clips with only a handful of people present their opinions and analyses. No independent engineers or optical experts were consulted about the physics-related theories presented to provide additional insight.
The film tries and fails miserably to inspire the viewer to ask more questions than the film tries to answer. The intelligent viewer may learn that without a rudimentary understanding of physics, gravity, and optics one can easily "prove" just about anything.
There is lots of nice NASA footage, but nothing that can't be found in other well-written documentaries.
- CarstenKlapp
- 22 mar 2003
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione45 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti