VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,4/10
1655
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA doctor invents a resurrection formula and tests it by killing his assistant over and over and over again.A doctor invents a resurrection formula and tests it by killing his assistant over and over and over again.A doctor invents a resurrection formula and tests it by killing his assistant over and over and over again.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 1 candidatura in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
I highly recommend this movie to aspiring film makers out there and to everyone else. It just goes to show what you can do with no budget, great atmosphere,some ingenuity, and a good script.
The movie itself is obviously not 'perfect' nothing is, but considering what was put into it to me its a hidden gem and while its not a total gorefest,it has some decent brutal scenes and shocking moments. It is definitely a great new take on an old tale.
The actors were great, the story had a nice even pace, was original, and everything else was definitely well thought out here. I gave this movie and 8 because it totally deserves it if only for the fact that these people did with a few bucks what Hollywood can't achieve for $50 million.
It obviously want for everyone who watched it after reading the reviews, but you can't please everyone all of the time.If you enjoy a nice independent ,atmospheric chiller. then check this out
The movie itself is obviously not 'perfect' nothing is, but considering what was put into it to me its a hidden gem and while its not a total gorefest,it has some decent brutal scenes and shocking moments. It is definitely a great new take on an old tale.
The actors were great, the story had a nice even pace, was original, and everything else was definitely well thought out here. I gave this movie and 8 because it totally deserves it if only for the fact that these people did with a few bucks what Hollywood can't achieve for $50 million.
It obviously want for everyone who watched it after reading the reviews, but you can't please everyone all of the time.If you enjoy a nice independent ,atmospheric chiller. then check this out
Adam (Christian Oliver) is a troubled med student who heads off to the remote lodge of a scientist he's never met. Adam's there to help with the scientist's experiments, but quickly becomes the title character.
SUBJECT TWO is an effective take on the Frankenstein story, complete with mad science, violence, and several unexpected twists. The snowy mountain setting is perfectly desolate, adding to the mystery and the growing sense of unease. There's also some poignancy mixed in with the horror.
The finale is a true jaw-dropper...
SUBJECT TWO is an effective take on the Frankenstein story, complete with mad science, violence, and several unexpected twists. The snowy mountain setting is perfectly desolate, adding to the mystery and the growing sense of unease. There's also some poignancy mixed in with the horror.
The finale is a true jaw-dropper...
One should not view Subject Two expecting a work of epic proportions and impact, as the film wishes to be at its core. Because it would only disappoint and maybe it just isn't worth any disappointments.
The story, well knit together, involves a failing medicine student and a mysterious doctor Frankenstein figure who try to redefine life and death. While this may not be such an impressively original concept, the film still works as a whole out of two solid reasons: up to the task acting and some thought-inducing (if not, once more, thoroughly innovative) ideas.
Given that the basics are there, 'Subject Two' is what I'd call a film with limited potential. I do not believe this theme can be exploited any better than it has been in the past and it'd have to show off something utterly brilliant to sweep me off my feet. A very gentle 6,5 from me.
The story, well knit together, involves a failing medicine student and a mysterious doctor Frankenstein figure who try to redefine life and death. While this may not be such an impressively original concept, the film still works as a whole out of two solid reasons: up to the task acting and some thought-inducing (if not, once more, thoroughly innovative) ideas.
Given that the basics are there, 'Subject Two' is what I'd call a film with limited potential. I do not believe this theme can be exploited any better than it has been in the past and it'd have to show off something utterly brilliant to sweep me off my feet. A very gentle 6,5 from me.
This was a great movie. Modern Frankenstein story with a twist. The story centers around Dr. Vic and his new assistant (an unhappy medical student named Adam). Separated from the world, hours from any town, Dr. Vic's experiments take a twisted turn. It was filmed entirely around Aspen, CO. The actors literally had to snowmobile hours on end to get to the film site. I really loved this movie. The horror aspect was less apparent, but I didn't mind at all. It speaks a great deal towards the nature of man, and towards our arrogance. The story was great and the acting was awesome!! The special effects were believable and not at all cheesy. Dean Stapleton is incredible. I am curious as to why he has not had other roles. Christian Oliver plays an amazing Adam. The emotion he brings to the part makes the movie. I recommend this to everyone!!!!!
They story line was very thin and a bit mixed up to say the least with an odd start and ending, I would not pay to see this movie and would even be reluctant to rent it.
It made out to be a kind of modern Frankenstein yes, but if you missed say the first ten minutes, you would be at a complete loss as to what the story line was and on top of that there was no real driection or aim of the movie.
Also the movie tried badly to give a sense of time loss for the subject 2, which it tried to convey be jumping between the subject being killed and then waking up.
Sorry but this was just a waste of time.
It made out to be a kind of modern Frankenstein yes, but if you missed say the first ten minutes, you would be at a complete loss as to what the story line was and on top of that there was no real driection or aim of the movie.
Also the movie tried badly to give a sense of time loss for the subject 2, which it tried to convey be jumping between the subject being killed and then waking up.
Sorry but this was just a waste of time.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizOfficial Selection 2006 Sundance Film Festival.
- BlooperWhen "Subject Two" first arrives at Doc's cabin, there is just a bit of snow on his shoulders. When he starts to talk to the doctor in the cabin, there is a lot of snow on his right shoulder. After the second time the camera switches back to the doctor, the snow is completely gone.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 23.000 USD (previsto)
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti