Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA teenager confesses to shooting a classmate, but claims it was an accident. Detectives also discover that he was responsible for a similar shooting two years earlier, but the records are se... Leggi tuttoA teenager confesses to shooting a classmate, but claims it was an accident. Detectives also discover that he was responsible for a similar shooting two years earlier, but the records are sealed.A teenager confesses to shooting a classmate, but claims it was an accident. Detectives also discover that he was responsible for a similar shooting two years earlier, but the records are sealed.
Foto
7,6377
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Recensioni in evidenza
Deadly gun control
'Law and Order' was always very good when it had stories inspired by ripped from the headlines cases. It was also very good often when it came to raising interesting questions and moral dilemmas of subjects not easy to discuss and cause much debate. "Trust" is a case of both, talking about the consequences of gun control and based on the case of Rod Matthews, a harrowing case in itself and still would have been relatively raw for some at the time the episode was aired.
"Trust" was to me a great episode actually and one of the better ones of Season 2's second half in my view. Its story is just as disturbing as the case it's based upon and the questions it raises about the subject it covers are interesting and handled tactfully and without bias. And rightfully so, considering the timing for reasons mentioned already and because it is something that many will feel strongly about. Would not have been as lenient perhaps if it was not so tactful, while acknowledging that this is not an easy subject to talk about.
Sure, things like everything to do with how the gun came into possession when that could easily have been avoided can be called into question. It is not as questionable though when remembering what the case is about and how Jamie came to be the way he became.
Issues to me here in "Trust" are next to none, though some may disagree. It didn't grab me completely straightaway but that did turn around quite dramatically once the legalities and moral dilemmas came in and the revelations kept mounting.
On the other hand, "Trust" is shot and lit with the right amount of grit and slickness, the editing noticeably tighter than it was in the first season and that is true for the whole of Season 2 and not just "Trust". The direction has momentum but has breathing space when necessary, so the case mostly doesn't feel dull yet we have time to take in what is being said which is a lot. The music is not overused or too melodramatic.
Regarding the writing, "Trust" is tautly and sensitively written, making one think hard about the issues being raised. Stone's answer to being asked as to whether he would testify against his own child really does resonate and gives chills. The story is not an easy watch, not a problem as it is not an easy subject (if it was an easy watch it would have meant the real impact of the issues raised would not have been there), and it is presented powerfully and hard-hittingly. Jamie is one truly disturbed character and one can't help feeling a lot of anger towards Ian, with him playing a major part in why the events came to be.
All the acting is very good, Michael Moriarty being the standout of the regulars and Harley Cross, in a truly harrowing performance not easily forgotten, giving the performance of the episode.
Summarising, great. 9/10
"Trust" was to me a great episode actually and one of the better ones of Season 2's second half in my view. Its story is just as disturbing as the case it's based upon and the questions it raises about the subject it covers are interesting and handled tactfully and without bias. And rightfully so, considering the timing for reasons mentioned already and because it is something that many will feel strongly about. Would not have been as lenient perhaps if it was not so tactful, while acknowledging that this is not an easy subject to talk about.
Sure, things like everything to do with how the gun came into possession when that could easily have been avoided can be called into question. It is not as questionable though when remembering what the case is about and how Jamie came to be the way he became.
Issues to me here in "Trust" are next to none, though some may disagree. It didn't grab me completely straightaway but that did turn around quite dramatically once the legalities and moral dilemmas came in and the revelations kept mounting.
On the other hand, "Trust" is shot and lit with the right amount of grit and slickness, the editing noticeably tighter than it was in the first season and that is true for the whole of Season 2 and not just "Trust". The direction has momentum but has breathing space when necessary, so the case mostly doesn't feel dull yet we have time to take in what is being said which is a lot. The music is not overused or too melodramatic.
Regarding the writing, "Trust" is tautly and sensitively written, making one think hard about the issues being raised. Stone's answer to being asked as to whether he would testify against his own child really does resonate and gives chills. The story is not an easy watch, not a problem as it is not an easy subject (if it was an easy watch it would have meant the real impact of the issues raised would not have been there), and it is presented powerfully and hard-hittingly. Jamie is one truly disturbed character and one can't help feeling a lot of anger towards Ian, with him playing a major part in why the events came to be.
All the acting is very good, Michael Moriarty being the standout of the regulars and Harley Cross, in a truly harrowing performance not easily forgotten, giving the performance of the episode.
Summarising, great. 9/10
A very disturbed young man
The finding of a dead body by some kids brings Paul Sorvino and Chris Noth to the scene at a deserted waterfront warehouse. The body is that of a teen not much older than the youths who found him.
One other thing is found. A large caliber pistol on the edge of a pier where the perpetrator tried to fling it in the water. It has an owner Tom Mason who has a son Harley Cross, a very disturbed young man.
The parents are divorced and Mason has custody. It also turns out that there was another similar incident a few years back.
Justice is going to be hard to come by here. A combination of the father's wealth and sealed records which have to be obtained.
Cross gives a fascinating performance that makes one hearken back to the classic film The Bad Seed. He truly is one, but this seed got nurtured and developed in his father's house.
One other thing is found. A large caliber pistol on the edge of a pier where the perpetrator tried to fling it in the water. It has an owner Tom Mason who has a son Harley Cross, a very disturbed young man.
The parents are divorced and Mason has custody. It also turns out that there was another similar incident a few years back.
Justice is going to be hard to come by here. A combination of the father's wealth and sealed records which have to be obtained.
Cross gives a fascinating performance that makes one hearken back to the classic film The Bad Seed. He truly is one, but this seed got nurtured and developed in his father's house.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis episode appears to be based on several separate cases/incidents:
- The 1986 Rod Matthews case. In 1986, 14-year-old Rod Matthews of Massachusetts murdered his classmate Shaun Ouillette after luring him to a remote area and bludgeoning him with a baseball bat. Matthews had told friends for months he wanted to know what it felt like to kill someone. He later bragged about the crime and showed others the body, leading to an anonymous tip that exposed him. Arrested and convicted, [as of 2019] Matthews remains in prison for the murder.
- The 1989 Barbara Stager case. Stager was convicted of murdering her husband, Russell Stager, in 1989 in Durham, North Carolina. She claimed the shooting was accidental, but investigators found it was a calculated act driven by financial motives, including life insurance. It was later discovered that her first husband had also died under suspiciously similar circumstances. She was sentenced to life in prison.
- The 1872 Jesse Pomeroy (a.k.a. "The Boston Boy Fiend") case. Pomeroy, known as "The Boston Boy Fiend," was a teenage murderer who shocked 19th-century America. Born in 1859, he began torturing younger boys at age 12 and was briefly institutionalized. After his early release, he murdered two children-10-year-old Katie Curran and 4-year-old Horace Millen-in 1874. At just 14, Pomeroy was convicted and sentenced to death, but due to his age, the sentence was commuted to life in solitary confinement. He died in custody in 1932. His case raised enduring questions about juvenile justice and mental illness.
- BlooperWhen the ballistics expert demonstrated to Ceretta and Logan the difference between a single action and double action pistol, they all violated the first rule of gun safety: ALWAYS treat every firearm as if it is loaded UNTIL you have confirmed for YOURSELF that it isn't, NEVER assume a gun is unloaded; this is something that is drilled into law enforcement during basic training. The forensics tech picks the gun up, cocks the hammer and pulls the trigger, without double checking (for Ceretta & Logan's benefit) to make sure it wasn't loaded. When Logan picked up the double action, he also pulled the trigger without checking to see if its loaded, he assumed that the tech had made sure it wasn't loaded, which can prove to be a fatal mistake. Failing to heed this rule is how Alec Baldwin accidentally shot and killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, and seriously injured director Joel Souza, on the set of Rust (2024) and led to Baldwin & set armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed being charged with involuntary manslaughter.
- Citazioni
Executive ADA Ben Stone: There's no statute of limitations on murder.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti