Army of the Dead

2.5 hours of this is way too much. Dumb conversations unfunny jokes and bad acting. Zavk Snyder, why man?

A lot about this movie was hammed up/ hyped up in the media. It did have a couple well known actors in it fer sure, but only 2 or 3 at most.

Aside from that, it has a number of tropes in it that people will recognize from zombie horror, and combined with the action and gore and elements of the undead at times, it was a pretty decent film.

That being said, the drawbacks, thoguh few, happened frequently enoguh to deter from what could have been a more spectacular zombie film to add to the genre in a memorable way.

One thing that always drags down zombie and horror in general: TOO MUCH TALKING.

This is what mad the Walking Dead show go from a great cool unique watch, to another survival drama that only sometimes amped things up.

Army of The Dead has waaay too many scenes of nedless conveersation instead of more cool or even campy risks taken with the zombies and gore.

All around the film is a 6/10 because of what worked for the genre of film involving a bit of action and the undead, but it just barely slid by with that score at best.

Some cool action and limited humor do not make up for crappy characters, crappy dialog, and a crappy story! :-(

A number of reviewers have already taken shots at the huge plot holes and ridiculous setup of this movie; I share in both their criticism and disappointment. If you happen to care about such lofty things like coherent storytelling or character development, I'd wait to watch this lazy entry into the zombie genre until you're either drunk or stoned to overlook its many problems.

And while Zack may have gotten some kind of personal thrill out of manning every major job in this project, the outcome has clearly suffered as a result. What could have been an otherwise outstanding zombie action flick, given proper attention to detail and an avoidance of lazy tropes, is instead no more than another sparkly yet mediocre piece of cookie-cutter movie confection.

The fact that more movie goers aren't outraged by the significant and apparently permanent drop in quality/intelligence of most these blockbuster Hollywood productions is what bewilders me. Apparently, just shoveling an old retread of a story into a production-line CGI machine is enough to satisfy most of today's audience, who blithely flock to, praise, and subsidize whatever vapid POS comes out. Are super hero action scenes really all we're after anymore? Isn't it time to demand more for your entertainment dollar?

Chessy, corny, boring storyline, terrible acting (not all of them, but still), has absolutely no meaning, no lesson learned. It's supposed to be some kind of action film about a heist, I guess, but don't even enjoy watching the action. Too long, you can cut half of the screen time and still understand what's going on.

4/10 is a stretch because I'm in a good mood.