VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,3/10
1738
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un custode di cinquant'anni è impiegato per accudire una bambina di 10 anni. Il suo compito più importante è quello di mantenere le sue protesi che sono fatte di ghiaccio e devono essere cam... Leggi tuttoUn custode di cinquant'anni è impiegato per accudire una bambina di 10 anni. Il suo compito più importante è quello di mantenere le sue protesi che sono fatte di ghiaccio e devono essere cambiate più volte al giorno.Un custode di cinquant'anni è impiegato per accudire una bambina di 10 anni. Il suo compito più importante è quello di mantenere le sue protesi che sono fatte di ghiaccio e devono essere cambiate più volte al giorno.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 3 candidature totali
Romola Garai
- Céleste
- (as Romola Garaï)
Matt Coster
- Doctor
- (voce)
Martin Verset
- Albert (Child)
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
This movie is very clearly open to many different interpretations, mine is mostly based on my emotional response. I think in a way this work kinda dives into the hidden fear and repulsion many people have towards the female body: menstruations, fertility, pregnancy, etc.
Albert is scared by Mia's first symbolic period, has unnerving memories of his wife's pregnancy and Celeste's character speaks for itself. The war barely ended so we also have another layer of violence to add to the complex situation.
It's a very very interesting movie but the pacing is glacial so I can't give it more than 5.
Albert is scared by Mia's first symbolic period, has unnerving memories of his wife's pregnancy and Celeste's character speaks for itself. The war barely ended so we also have another layer of violence to add to the complex situation.
It's a very very interesting movie but the pacing is glacial so I can't give it more than 5.
I'm not a fan of films that are (literally) so dark I can't see what's going on. I know that this is a popular directors' device to "enhance engagement" but IMHO it risks losing the audience completely. In this case, I stuck with it, but remained quite irritated.
Fortunately, the tone and mood compensate somewhat, and the air of mystery is well-maintained, and the occasional bursts of extreme violence are appropriately shocking. I can't honestly say I worked out what it all meant and what was "really happening", but it was quite interesting nevertheless.
Worth a look - I preferred "Evolution" though.
Fortunately, the tone and mood compensate somewhat, and the air of mystery is well-maintained, and the occasional bursts of extreme violence are appropriately shocking. I can't honestly say I worked out what it all meant and what was "really happening", but it was quite interesting nevertheless.
Worth a look - I preferred "Evolution" though.
You gotta be in the mood to watch a movie like this, because it freaked me out because of it's realy weird and disturbing story. Therefore only recommended for the diehard arthouse movie fans, who can stumach a bleak and depressing story.
The good: beautifully photographed, with some scenes resembing a still picture or a painting. It really looks gorgeous and I really love that. The many unknown actors are acting really well, although there is definitely a lack of chemistry BETWEEN the actors and that brings me to the criticism...
The bad: this movie is definitely lacking spark and punch caused by a real lack of interaction between the actors, which wasnt bothering me at the start, but halfway through I began to get somewhat bored by this absence of actors actually speaking to each other. But this is only a minor criticism, many other folks might not mind about this at all.
A beautifully looking moody picture, with it's only downfall being a lack of actor's chemistry.
The good: beautifully photographed, with some scenes resembing a still picture or a painting. It really looks gorgeous and I really love that. The many unknown actors are acting really well, although there is definitely a lack of chemistry BETWEEN the actors and that brings me to the criticism...
The bad: this movie is definitely lacking spark and punch caused by a real lack of interaction between the actors, which wasnt bothering me at the start, but halfway through I began to get somewhat bored by this absence of actors actually speaking to each other. But this is only a minor criticism, many other folks might not mind about this at all.
A beautifully looking moody picture, with it's only downfall being a lack of actor's chemistry.
Pretty pictures do not a film make.
Though Earwig has great cinematography and an ethereal glass harmonica score, it is dramatically inert from the word go.
It comes off as dull and pretentious and squanders its moody setting and mysterious premise.
Lucille Hadzihallilovic's third feature is arguably her weakest and most self-indulgent yet.
Though Earwig has great cinematography and an ethereal glass harmonica score, it is dramatically inert from the word go.
It comes off as dull and pretentious and squanders its moody setting and mysterious premise.
Lucille Hadzihallilovic's third feature is arguably her weakest and most self-indulgent yet.
I understand that it might be some kind artistic expression but I'm afraid it's not everyone cup of tea.
I usually like slow development movies but this one ended up being utterly boring.
After 20 minutes of no dialog I gave up.
If you are looking for a good suspense and mystery movie I think this is not the case. Further more if you have to wait more than half an our to see something happening, I can't consider it entertaining.
As I mentioned in the title they probably understood that most of people will not reach the end of the movie and that's why they opted for adding the credits before the movie starts.
I usually like slow development movies but this one ended up being utterly boring.
After 20 minutes of no dialog I gave up.
If you are looking for a good suspense and mystery movie I think this is not the case. Further more if you have to wait more than half an our to see something happening, I can't consider it entertaining.
As I mentioned in the title they probably understood that most of people will not reach the end of the movie and that's why they opted for adding the credits before the movie starts.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizLucile Hadzihalilovic's first English-language film.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Earwig?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 14.170 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 54min(114 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti