Ufficialmente bionde

For the life of me I cannot understand the distaste for Legally Blondes by other viewers. It's a Disney Studio product geared at the teen market and hopefully launching Milly and Becky Rosso as a distaff version of the Sprouse twins. What was everyone expecting?

Possibly they were expecting something on the order of Reese Witherspoon with that title and the fact that the Rosso twins were made to be cousins of Reese's film character. I guess everyone's expectations were raised to ridiculous levels. The relationship to the film Legally Blonde was not even necessary for the film's story to unfold.

Very simply the twins come over from the United Kingdom because they're widowed dad Christopher Cousins gets a teaching position. They are put in a posh prep school where after they challenge the reign of snobbish Brittany Curran as the queen of the school, they form their own set and with fashion sense and common sense win over a lot of kids.

But that doesn't sit well with Curran who with her minion Chad Broskey tries to frame one of the girls and a boy she's dating, Bobby Campo, in a cheating scandal. She also tries to split the twins themselves and almost succeeds.

For some reason school principal Lisa Bane takes an instant dislike to the ingenuous Rosso girls. That's never really gone into except that Bane is on some power trip. They're nice kids, who could dislike them except evil people.

The girls appeared on The Suite Life Of Zack and Cody and this film was the Magic Kingdom's way of hopefully launching them as attractions. Don't be surprised if they don't get their own TV series from Disney yet.

As for Legally Blondes it's amusing enough if you're not expecting Reese Witherspoon.

If I had to describe this movie in one word it would be 'painful'. The twins (identical, what else?) spoke in unison for practically the entire movie and had some stupid hand gesture they did (think Amber and Ashley from Hannah Montana but remove the humour).

One of the more annoying aspects was that because the girls were identical and went to a private school (meaning there was a strict uniform) you couldn't tell them apart at all. One of the girls was supposed to be smarter than the other and one of them had a huge fear of public speaking. I have no idea if this was the same girl or not because the movie made no effort to help out the audience distinguish between them. This made half the 'plot' very confusing - most of the movie required knowing who was who. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against movies starring twins. I love the Parent Trap and really enjoy watching Mary-Kate and Ashley movies because you know which twin is which and there is something actually resembling a plot.

Also there was little to no "legal" content save for a quick trial of sorts at the end of the movie, which I highly doubt should have been done by high-school students. I really wish I could get the two hours of my life back from watching this movie. I really don't recommend it.

Legally Blondes takes a fresh approach to the franchise, introducing us to Annie and Izzy Woods, Elle Woods' British cousins. When their father sends them to attend an American prep school, the girls find themselves navigating a new culture and dealing with the challenges of fitting in. Inspired by their famous cousin, they embark on a mission to prove themselves and use their legal knowledge to outsmart the school's bullies and protect their newfound friends.

Review: Legally Blondes, as a spin-off of the popular Legally Blonde series, offers a lighthearted and entertaining experience, but it lacks the spark and depth of its predecessors. The film centers around Annie and Izzy Woods, played by Milly Rosso and Becky Rosso, who bring a certain charm and energy to their roles. While they don't quite match the charisma of Reese Witherspoon, their performances are engaging and enjoyable.

The plot of Legally Blondes, though familiar in its themes of empowerment and overcoming obstacles, fails to fully capture the same level of wit and substance found in the original films. The storyline relies heavily on teenage clichés and predictable plot twists, leaving little room for surprises or character development. The humor, while occasionally amusing, often feels forced and falls flat.

The supporting cast delivers adequate performances, but their characters lack the depth and memorable qualities seen in the previous installments. The script lacks the sharp and clever dialogue that made the original films so memorable. Additionally, the film's pacing feels uneven, with certain scenes dragging while others rush through important moments.

Despite its flaws, Legally Blondes does provide some light-hearted entertainment. The film's focus on female empowerment and the importance of friendship is commendable, and it offers a positive message for young viewers. The bright and colorful visuals, combined with the girls' fashionable outfits, add a touch of fun and style to the overall experience.

In conclusion, Legally Blondes falls short of capturing the magic of its predecessors. While it offers a lighthearted and entertaining watch, it lacks the depth, wit, and memorable characters that made the original films so beloved. If you're a fan of the Legally Blonde series and looking for a casual and undemanding viewing experience, Legally Blondes may provide some amusement, but overall, it fails to leave a lasting impact.

This film is about two blonde twins from Britain, moving to the USA to study in their famous cousin's school.

"Legally Blondes" is a low budget rip off of the first "Legally Blonde". The storyline is basically the same, only that it happens in a high school, and every that could have looked glamorous is downgraded to stuff you find in a neighbourhood charity store. A fluffy chick flick has this obligatory shopping scene of trying different glamorous outfits in a store, but it does not even look glamorous or entertaining. I also could not tell between Izzy and Annie, as the film makes no distinction between them whatsoever. Maybe it was the intention of the filmmakers, but as a viewer I would like to know which is which when I am watching the film. In addition, the level of intelligence in "Legally Blondes" is woefully inadequate, it makes it seem like a teenage version of "Legally Blonde" but a lot worse. In short, "Legally Blondes" is a disappointing sequel.

'Legally Blondes' is a rather rubbish return to this universe, yet somehow I wasn't actually overly bothered by it whilst watching. I'm not sure how the aforementioned is true, because it is objectively a bad movie; there isn't a detail about it that I could list under praise.

Camilla and Rebecca Rosso play the lead twins. I like how they switched it up from a solo main, it feels slightly unique from the two other movies. With that said, the acting level from the Rossos isn't the best and the (presumably exaggerated) British accents are a bit irritating/distracting.

Also onscreen is Christopher Cousins, fellow 'Breaking Bad' fans will find that minorly interesting. Another member is Bobby Campo, an actor I like from underrated made-for-television Xmas flick 'Snow Bride'. As you can tell, the cast is this film's standout element.

I probably should've disliked this stronger, I'm not sure why I didn't to be honest. Lastly, it's noteworthy that Reese Witherspoon served as producer for this though doesn't turn up during it; I don't blame her, but a cameo would've been cool.