The Nan Movie
- 2022
- 1h 35min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,8/10
1820
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA foul-mouthed and recalcitrant elderly woman reluctantly agrees to a road trip with her grandson to visit her estranged, dying sister.A foul-mouthed and recalcitrant elderly woman reluctantly agrees to a road trip with her grandson to visit her estranged, dying sister.A foul-mouthed and recalcitrant elderly woman reluctantly agrees to a road trip with her grandson to visit her estranged, dying sister.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 2 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
The film was slated for release pre-pandemic, and as a fan of the Nan character I had been very much looking forward to watching this. I was very disappointed. The various scenes did not flow, and the overall story was very weak.
Wait for it to come to a streaming platform before you maybe watch it.
Wait for it to come to a streaming platform before you maybe watch it.
This is what happens when you try to turn a 5 minute sketch character into a feature length movie.
I enjoyed the Nan character but I did wonder where it could go beyond Nan being outrageous, rude and grumpy.
And that is essentially how the film goes. The first 10 minutes are amusing and then I found myself questioning what the point of it all was. In trying to make Nan a more rounded character they lose most of what made her funny and there isn't enough good dialogue or material to justify or sustain the feature length run time.
There's is a message in there somewhere and there is surprisingly some emotion in the back story but it gets muddled alongside being kidnapped by a mentally ill vegan and followed by a dubious scouser.
I enjoyed the Nan character but I did wonder where it could go beyond Nan being outrageous, rude and grumpy.
And that is essentially how the film goes. The first 10 minutes are amusing and then I found myself questioning what the point of it all was. In trying to make Nan a more rounded character they lose most of what made her funny and there isn't enough good dialogue or material to justify or sustain the feature length run time.
There's is a message in there somewhere and there is surprisingly some emotion in the back story but it gets muddled alongside being kidnapped by a mentally ill vegan and followed by a dubious scouser.
This was always going to be rubbish. I can't believe they got this film funded.
I'd rather watch paint dry than ever see this again, and I truly mean that.
I'd rather watch paint dry than ever see this again, and I truly mean that.
I didn't come into this with many expectations, but thought it might be a bit of a daft laugh. It pretty much wasn't. Having read the trivia re the re-cutting of the film it starts to make sense how someone of the stature of the great Katherine Parkinson allowed herself to be in such tosh. This is puerile rubbish. Honestly, don't waste your time.
I will start by saying that this movie is, probably, about 10 years too late. Had this been made early '10's, I can imagine a better response. The jokes are outdated and we've heard them all before. The 'present' scenes are predictable though I found the ending to be really good.
The 'past' scenes I thought were amazing, and my four stars are for them. The movie would have been better going down the route of Nan telling Jamie about the past without a road trip, then ending with the meeting. Catherine and Katherine did a good job in those scenes.
The worst part was, by far, the out of place and ridiculous animation that bought nothing to the movie.
So, would I recommend the film?
Sober - No.
After a few drinks - Sure.
Go in with low expectations and I think you'll enjoy the movie due to the flashbacks.
The 'past' scenes I thought were amazing, and my four stars are for them. The movie would have been better going down the route of Nan telling Jamie about the past without a road trip, then ending with the meeting. Catherine and Katherine did a good job in those scenes.
The worst part was, by far, the out of place and ridiculous animation that bought nothing to the movie.
So, would I recommend the film?
Sober - No.
After a few drinks - Sure.
Go in with low expectations and I think you'll enjoy the movie due to the flashbacks.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe first cut of the film was delivered to investors in 2019. It originally consisted predominantly of scenes set in 1940s London focusing on a young Joan Taylor. The investors were uncomfortable with the film's focus on World War 2, and insisted the flashback sequences be cut back significantly to accommodate much more of the present-day plot with the elderly Joan Taylor, whom fans of The Catherine Tate Show would recognize. New footage, greatly expanding the modern-day road trip sections, was filmed without director Josie Rourke at a low-cost, with animation sequences also used to fill any gaps. As a result of these additions, Rourke had her director's credit removed, and the released cut of the film simply does not have a director credit.
- BlooperWhen Walter is sent to France he is depicted at a station with LNER signage. This is incorrect if he is leaving London to go to France since the LNER ran north out of London. The most likely way to get to the south coast ports would be on the Southern Railway or, less likely, on the GWR to Weymouth or Plymouth.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Projector: The Nan Movie (2022)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 2.167.020 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti