VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,0/10
12.270
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un medico disonorato e la sua famiglia sono tenuti in ostaggio a casa dai criminali in fuga, quando una rapina fallita li costringe a cercare cure mediche immediate.Un medico disonorato e la sua famiglia sono tenuti in ostaggio a casa dai criminali in fuga, quando una rapina fallita li costringe a cercare cure mediche immediate.Un medico disonorato e la sua famiglia sono tenuti in ostaggio a casa dai criminali in fuga, quando una rapina fallita li costringe a cercare cure mediche immediate.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
There were more plot holes than the unnecessarily long and sappy 90 minute cat and mouse runtime smh. I get that this is amateur writer Doug Wolfe's first ever writing credit, but c'mon, didn't anyone else proofread this ridiculous long dragged out mess?
Here's the math: of the 90 min runtime, subtract 7 mins for opening and post credits. Then we have 20 mins of some bad guys involved in, what, I don't know, that also pull off a stupid stunt, as well as the Brady Bunch family, where the son is a failure, for, I don't know what. The remaining 60+ minutes is the most ridiculous and illogical plot-riddled to the point of hilariousness cat-and-mouse game, with dragged out long and useless scenes. Add the soap-opera sappy dialogue between two brothers, and the father and son trying to rekindle their relationship - amidst the so called terror. Escape, come back, hide, get caught, repeat. And even for criminals, the stupidity in their actions were laughable. It got annoying very fast. Had this film been a 20 min short, it may have received a 5 or 6 from me.
Bruce Willis was his usual "look at me I'm Bruce Willis" attitude with his stale monotonic washed-up tough-guy demeanor. But that I expected going into this, because anything worse than a Bruce Willis film, is another Bruce Willis film. Even the pretty Lydia Hull, who oddly is in almost every Willis film, was boring and stale. The rest of the cast were ok, with the bad guys being the most convincing, and made the effort to act. I'm sure failure from the director to direct his cast properly was a big part of the rest of the characters' failed acting.
The directing was also sub-par with some terrible editing. For a b-grade film, the score wasn't as annoying as I'd expected it to be, but still somewhat overbearing and unfitting. The cinematography was ok, but bad in the night outdoor scenes.
If you watch this film at 5x faster speed, even without hearing any dialogue, you'll get the gist of the entire story, which is nothing new and done many times before. Sadly, it's a generous 3/10 from me, and I will never get my 90 minutes back.
Here's the math: of the 90 min runtime, subtract 7 mins for opening and post credits. Then we have 20 mins of some bad guys involved in, what, I don't know, that also pull off a stupid stunt, as well as the Brady Bunch family, where the son is a failure, for, I don't know what. The remaining 60+ minutes is the most ridiculous and illogical plot-riddled to the point of hilariousness cat-and-mouse game, with dragged out long and useless scenes. Add the soap-opera sappy dialogue between two brothers, and the father and son trying to rekindle their relationship - amidst the so called terror. Escape, come back, hide, get caught, repeat. And even for criminals, the stupidity in their actions were laughable. It got annoying very fast. Had this film been a 20 min short, it may have received a 5 or 6 from me.
Bruce Willis was his usual "look at me I'm Bruce Willis" attitude with his stale monotonic washed-up tough-guy demeanor. But that I expected going into this, because anything worse than a Bruce Willis film, is another Bruce Willis film. Even the pretty Lydia Hull, who oddly is in almost every Willis film, was boring and stale. The rest of the cast were ok, with the bad guys being the most convincing, and made the effort to act. I'm sure failure from the director to direct his cast properly was a big part of the rest of the characters' failed acting.
The directing was also sub-par with some terrible editing. For a b-grade film, the score wasn't as annoying as I'd expected it to be, but still somewhat overbearing and unfitting. The cinematography was ok, but bad in the night outdoor scenes.
If you watch this film at 5x faster speed, even without hearing any dialogue, you'll get the gist of the entire story, which is nothing new and done many times before. Sadly, it's a generous 3/10 from me, and I will never get my 90 minutes back.
The only reason I watched this was because Bruce Willis was featured. I can't imagine why he decided to act in/put his name on this film. I am astonished at how disappointing this movie was. Willis's son's wife is a plastic surgery nightmare. The characters have dozens of opportunities to save themselves from their predicament. What a disappointment of a thriller. Waste of time.
If you are a Bruce Willis fan give this a miss. it is awful. Maybe Bruce was related to the other people in this film and thought he would appear as a favour? No, he should not have bothered. Aside from Bruce whose performance was wooden or just about there. I think he must have filmed all his scenes in one day to get it all over and done with family or not. Poor story or just downright lazy? I could hve written better myself, on a bad day. Maybe Bruce was bored living with his ex demi in lockdown and got out for a couple of hours to "star" in this. Really Bruce? Shame on you, trying to pass this off as entertainment.
Even though I watched it with very low expectations but it was able to disappoint me, with this kind of movies you only hope for action but the director wasn't able to deliver any good action sequences through out the movie adding the immature screenwriting and really bad acting especially from the lead actor and the daughter made this movie annoying and hard to watch but at least Bruce Willis showed up for this one, go watch Hostage or Trespass instead of this cheap
I've been a Bruce Willis fan for Many years. This movie is the worst or one of the worst B. Willis movies I've ever seen. Nothing makes sense in the movie. The acting is atrocious. Look, , unless you have a choice of going to jail or watching this movie, I would not recommend this Movie.
A real disappointment in almost every way. Good luck if you survive this movie.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizFilmed in and around Columbus, GA, this film features some local actors, including Riley Wolfe Rach (Riley), Jef Holbrook (clerk) and Sara Lynn Holbrook (woman in store). Jef Holbrook is also credited in the crew as "Local Casting/Casting Associate" and Sara Lynn Holbrook is also credited in the crew as "Studio Teacher/Child Labor Coordinator".
- Blooper"When Jamie is shooting at Frank, he shoots at Frank seven times! There isn't a seven shot revolver." A common mistake is to believe there are only 6 round revolvers. Likely, in this case, it is a goof but 7 and 8 round have become more common including .357/.38SPC with there being 10 Rnd revolvers as well.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Half in the Bag: Censor (2021)
- Colonne sonoreOpening
Performed and Written by Nima Fakhrara
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Everything New on HBO Max in August
Everything New on HBO Max in August
Looking for something different to add to your Watchlist? Take a peek at what movies and TV shows are coming to HBO Max this month.
- How long is Survive the Night?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Survive the Night - Fuga nella notte
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 3.500.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 220.371 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 30min(90 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti