Revealing Ukraine

You can look up my review history, and I think I have only given a 1/10 one time before for The Passion of Christ by Mel Gibson (I love Mel's movies).

The 1/10 rating for me is for films that are gross misinformation in the face of obvious historical and factual information.

I think the other reviewers have pointed out some of the terrible gross misrepresentation of facts, like referring to the Revolution of Dignity of 2014 as coup-d'etat, over and over again. Or the wild lies about the history of Ukraine by Putin and some Ukrainian oligarch, which are never challenged in the documentary.

I would also add that the Right Sector, isn't a neo-Nazi organization, which lead Ukrainians into the front line to get shot by neo-Nazi snipers, this was presented as a hypothesis, with zero evidence!

Then for some wild reason the second half of this documentary, went off on some wild tangent about the Ukrainian interference in US elections of 2016...in order to support Clinton. Which is just wild, because the Trump's campaign manager Manafort, was fired by Trump because of his ties to Russia! Of course as a side not after Manafort was already sitting in a fed prison, Tump then pardons him after rolling Manafort under the bus.

I can keep going about the falsely presented percentages, in charts, or suggesting that George Soros, was the main orchestrator behind the Revolution of Dignity, because Soros established a fund to help Ukrainians...23 years ago. And no mention about what the mass protest was actually about! And on and on and on...

Sorry, can't stop, at the end of the documentary Ukraine is presented as the aggressor agains Russia! And blames the Revolution of Dignity for the further destruction of the Ukraine's economy, without mentioning the Russian invasion of the Danbas region and along the Ukrainian borders right after the change of government!!!

This entire documentary is pro-Putin propaganda.

Lastly, I want to mention this documentary's biggest sin, is this film is exceptionally boring. It's basically two talking heads who have committed unspeakable crimes against the Ukrainian people, and some ideologue "journalist." That's all we get...

Just minute 17:20 Putin recognize his frustration and intentions. After that there is an interview of Oliver Stone that seems to be sleepy and far away from the answers of Viktor Mevdevchuck, Putin's personal friend as Vlad is the godfather of his daughter. Not much more to add. The only good thing of the film s a good way to understand the conspiranoic nightmare Putin is living and his lack of humanity or democratic values. Apart from that the dramatic music is all time on and the cinematography is very poor (starting from the "poetic" naked female of the beginning of the film). It is sad to see Oliver Stone as a puppet of Mr. Putin strategy of building the business case of the invasion.

Don't fool yourself that this movie has any truth at all. Enough is to say it was sponsored by the Russian government.

Did Putin took his medication early?

😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴 What was he blathering on about, ukrainians ain't Ukrainians, we are brothers Then Stone slavering over him was a bit sickly beyond belief, why would you have him interviewing him, if that scared of Putin?

Has he lost his fruitloop Conspiracy mind, he is supposed to be independent but just licked, well we all know what.

One sided interviewing technique is boring, bit like Putin.

Medvechuck seemed ok but then you remember he got swapped for 50 "supposed' Azov Nazis? Who says money is more important than supposed morals?

He said he wanted everyone wants peace and he keeps his money.

Regards Puttin.........

If you want to see an excellent example of Russian disinformation, this is the show to watch. Putin doesn't think UKRAINE was ever a country? Then what was 1918 when Ukraine was recognized by two dozen countries had diplomatic relations, passports, currency, international sovereign debt and was a democracy? And, what about the year 988 when Ukraine became Christian. Moscow didn't even exist. It was a fur trading post. The coins issued by Volodymyr the Great show the Ukrainian Trident on the reverse (tails side). If Kyiv was Russian and Prince Volodymyr was Russian-- why doesn't Russia use the Trident as it's symbol anywhere? Instead it is the National Emblem of Ukraine and nowhere to be found in Russia. In fact, Russian Czars and the Communists persecuted Ukrainians for wearing or showing the Trident. Don't believe me research it. And, BTW, Mr. Stone knows as much about the history of Ukraine as he does about the assainstion of John F. Kennedy.