VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,0/10
1664
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Dopo aver assistito all'omicidio della sua ragazza, un uomo rischia tutto, inclusa la realtà stessa, per scoprire la verità.Dopo aver assistito all'omicidio della sua ragazza, un uomo rischia tutto, inclusa la realtà stessa, per scoprire la verità.Dopo aver assistito all'omicidio della sua ragazza, un uomo rischia tutto, inclusa la realtà stessa, per scoprire la verità.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 candidature totali
Helene Seradilla
- Pedestrian
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
The actors except for a few exceptions are solid, sadly one of them is the lead.
It started off fine, a bit of mystery, until about 20% in where they dump all the info about what is really happening.
The writer definitely does not read any Scifi, because out of all the possibilities this has got to be the lamest story lines I could imagine, as soon as I realised there is nothing clever the movie really went down hill.
Its basically just sims, crossed with the Matrix with a bit of action on top. All comes off as a very poor rip of some aspects of the Matrix without any of its depth. We even have a bit of "bullet time" special effects.
They ignored the "show dont tell" which would have made the movie better. And exactly why you should care about a game of sims as some sort of crime against humanity is just ridiculous.
It started off fine, a bit of mystery, until about 20% in where they dump all the info about what is really happening.
The writer definitely does not read any Scifi, because out of all the possibilities this has got to be the lamest story lines I could imagine, as soon as I realised there is nothing clever the movie really went down hill.
Its basically just sims, crossed with the Matrix with a bit of action on top. All comes off as a very poor rip of some aspects of the Matrix without any of its depth. We even have a bit of "bullet time" special effects.
They ignored the "show dont tell" which would have made the movie better. And exactly why you should care about a game of sims as some sort of crime against humanity is just ridiculous.
It's a complete disappointment. The first thing I criticize is the music. The music of the movie is terrible. A movie soundtrack is definitely very important. The music that plays in this movie is classical. But the movie is science fiction. The other important thing is the plot. The script may be good, but the plot is very important. Jumping from topic to topic will take the viewer away from the movie. Also the actors. The actress definitely plays so badly that I would never want to see her again. Also the actor is not very good. Science fiction has been tried, but this is only in communication networks. In other words, when technology advances, it advances in the entire universe. For example, the fact that cars are the same, but almost all communication tools are made with eyes is a complete fiasco. I think no expense was spared for this movie. Because all the scenes were generally shot in the same place.
In short, it is one of the worst movies I have ever seen.
In short, it is one of the worst movies I have ever seen.
A mish mash of themes and tropes from movies that done them far better. There really isn't anything remotely original. The writing is flat and the actors don't seem to be very invested, I've seen far better acting during daytime soap operas. Cara Gee did OK but even she seemed to be phoning it in.
Nothing feels lived in, it feels like it is, them on a bad set with bad lighting and bad set design with no budget.
The special effects are early 90s level of bad. Lots of unnecessary lens flares and really, really, really bad green screen backgrounds. There's a weird soft fuzzy filter over everything.
The pacing is slow. It's really not exciting at all. Trying to be futuristic everything they touch bleeps and bloops.
As a hard core lover of everything scifi this was really disappointing. It doesn't even fit into "it's so bad it's good" territory.
There is nothing gained from watching this movie.
Nothing feels lived in, it feels like it is, them on a bad set with bad lighting and bad set design with no budget.
The special effects are early 90s level of bad. Lots of unnecessary lens flares and really, really, really bad green screen backgrounds. There's a weird soft fuzzy filter over everything.
The pacing is slow. It's really not exciting at all. Trying to be futuristic everything they touch bleeps and bloops.
As a hard core lover of everything scifi this was really disappointing. It doesn't even fit into "it's so bad it's good" territory.
There is nothing gained from watching this movie.
Interesting concept, the movie was a bit slow to get to the really interesting parts, and spent way too little time exploring the full potential of what was possible. I blame the budget for the budget for this. That being said, the film as watchable. I wold also want to add that the entire idea was a bit derivative, but also had its own unique twist. A movie version of platos allegory of the cave, are we real? Are our dreams real?
At some point these matrix like remakes will get it jst right and create something that will shine a new light on exitence as a whole.
I particularly liked the perfomance of David Hewlett, I have liked his roles ever since Stargate Atlantis. He was the main reason I kept watching. The lead female role was also done well. CGI could have been better.
At some point these matrix like remakes will get it jst right and create something that will shine a new light on exitence as a whole.
I particularly liked the perfomance of David Hewlett, I have liked his roles ever since Stargate Atlantis. He was the main reason I kept watching. The lead female role was also done well. CGI could have been better.
Other reviews contrasting this Canadian production (presumably lower budget, but unsurprisingly good acting) with Free Guy and Matrix aren't wrong, but what we see with this entry into that universe is not only visually appealing (all three films have had mind-bending special effects), but shows a bit of heart and soul. It feels less mass produced. So what was needed was a bit more work on the development of the characters, a bit more plot development. I acknowledge the criticism of another reviewer that the exposition feels a bit dogmatic, but davka (actually, for me) that is necessary for the precious little character development we do have here, so I wouldn't have edited that out. Rather, I'd have added to the run-time a bit, to flesh out all of the characters, precisely because, in a digital universe, personality and individuality begins to matter in this one. Perhaps...our choices do matter.
Lo sapevi?
- BlooperIn the confrontation scene in Hunter's office, just after he's shot you see him falling from his top floor office from a distance, but he's falling at a constant velocity, not accelerating as he would if gravity was working normally. This is a good indication that the level they're in isn't the real world but just another level with different rules.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Everything New on Hulu in August
Everything New on Hulu in August
There's a whole lot to love about Hulu's streaming offerings this month — get excited for brand-new series premieres and film favorites to watch at home.
- How long is Levels?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 33min(93 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti