La distruzione della casa dei suoi nonni porta un giovane a vendicarsi nascosto sotto un personaggio mascherato.La distruzione della casa dei suoi nonni porta un giovane a vendicarsi nascosto sotto un personaggio mascherato.La distruzione della casa dei suoi nonni porta un giovane a vendicarsi nascosto sotto un personaggio mascherato.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 4 candidature totali
Lawrence Oliver Cherry
- News Anchor - Dodley
- (voce)
- (solo nei titoli)
Kevin Alexis Rivera
- Store Employee
- (as a different name)
- Director
- Sceneggiatura
- Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
- Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro
Recensioni in evidenza
To save everyone time let me start out and tell you that this is in no way a revenge or vigilante movie. There is no violence, there is not much in the way of plot, there is no excitement or action. There is a little bit of boobies for like 60 seconds if that's your thing. This is an art house film, so be warned.
This was an odd movie to get all the way through for me, not because it's necessarily bad, but it's not "good" either because it really doesn't have a story or plot line. It is shot in a very gritty way that showcases both the beauty and griminess of New York. I've only been to NY state once and went through the various boroughs and they really do have a beauty to them, older architecture, mom and pop shops everywhere, it's alive and crawling with people. And rats. And pigeons. Because there's also the ugly side, trash everywhere, it stinks, it's noisy, the people are jerks...I hated NY city. But that doesn't mean I can't appreciate it.
And that's really a large part of this movie, the pros and the cons of life there. It's about how class warfare affects those at the bottom, about what happens to them when their neighborhood is bulldozed so an expensive high-rise complex can move in, displacing all the previous inhabitants. It's about immigrants moving into the middle of this and feeling out of place, trying to figure out where they fit in. This is not told through any sort of story, it's 90% atmosphere with a speech sort of explaining the heart of the issue near the end of the film. This is all told through the experiences of essentially 3 people, the displaced, the immigrant, and the wealthy real-estate mogul.
So if you like movies based entirely around atmosphere, long sweeping shots of city life, long silences and moments of brooding, give it a shot. The main performances were above average in general (couple poorly delivered lines here and there), the direction and cinematography is excellent...but it's a bit boring and feels aimless. I wouldn't recommend it to the average individual.
This was an odd movie to get all the way through for me, not because it's necessarily bad, but it's not "good" either because it really doesn't have a story or plot line. It is shot in a very gritty way that showcases both the beauty and griminess of New York. I've only been to NY state once and went through the various boroughs and they really do have a beauty to them, older architecture, mom and pop shops everywhere, it's alive and crawling with people. And rats. And pigeons. Because there's also the ugly side, trash everywhere, it stinks, it's noisy, the people are jerks...I hated NY city. But that doesn't mean I can't appreciate it.
And that's really a large part of this movie, the pros and the cons of life there. It's about how class warfare affects those at the bottom, about what happens to them when their neighborhood is bulldozed so an expensive high-rise complex can move in, displacing all the previous inhabitants. It's about immigrants moving into the middle of this and feeling out of place, trying to figure out where they fit in. This is not told through any sort of story, it's 90% atmosphere with a speech sort of explaining the heart of the issue near the end of the film. This is all told through the experiences of essentially 3 people, the displaced, the immigrant, and the wealthy real-estate mogul.
So if you like movies based entirely around atmosphere, long sweeping shots of city life, long silences and moments of brooding, give it a shot. The main performances were above average in general (couple poorly delivered lines here and there), the direction and cinematography is excellent...but it's a bit boring and feels aimless. I wouldn't recommend it to the average individual.
Good acting with a dark, brooding, bizarre protagonist. Kept my interest but slow going at times. Some will say this is a story about nothing. For me it felt like a 21st century Dickensian social commentary about the haves and have nots. Would have rated higher if not for lackluster ending.
The movie itself is poor, kinda went nowhere, but the acting from Cosmo, is nothing short of breathless. As a sufferer of anxiety/depression I identified with him immediately. The meltdown in the car, I cried.
I had expectations for this one. That's why it is so hard to admit that I didn't really like it.
The film is subtle, is an art house film, I knew that before. I knew the pace wouldn't be a typical Hollywood pace, I knew that was a drama and not a vigilante movie or something similar. So, that was not my issue with the film. The silence and the lack of much dialogue doesn't bother me either (I like or love most of Kim Ki-duk films, that are much more raw than this regarding that).
However, for the most time, I can't say that something relevant for the plot was happening in scene. They ate a lot and don't like to speak while they are eating. I get that.
The film plays with your patience, drags a lot, with some cool shots, a nice cinematography and a good score. Unfortunately, the substance is not there and I was really bored during most of his duration, as there is no material here to fill 90 minutes.
Not my cup of tea, even if there are here and there some good appointments to take. Almost all in the technical aspects.
PS: That would be a pretty cool mask for a new slasher movie.
The film is subtle, is an art house film, I knew that before. I knew the pace wouldn't be a typical Hollywood pace, I knew that was a drama and not a vigilante movie or something similar. So, that was not my issue with the film. The silence and the lack of much dialogue doesn't bother me either (I like or love most of Kim Ki-duk films, that are much more raw than this regarding that).
However, for the most time, I can't say that something relevant for the plot was happening in scene. They ate a lot and don't like to speak while they are eating. I get that.
The film plays with your patience, drags a lot, with some cool shots, a nice cinematography and a good score. Unfortunately, the substance is not there and I was really bored during most of his duration, as there is no material here to fill 90 minutes.
Not my cup of tea, even if there are here and there some good appointments to take. Almost all in the technical aspects.
PS: That would be a pretty cool mask for a new slasher movie.
Honestly, I spent a great deal of this movie wondering what happened to the beautiful, sexy whiskey voice Cosmo had on "Shogun"; about the same amount of time I spent waiting for the plot to show up. The balance of the run-time (and a short time thereafter) included a failed search for the end of the film; not that there was much of a plot from the beginning.
After the incredible success of "Shogun", and Cosmo's performance in it, I was soooo looking forward to watching this movie to see more of his work. I started an attempt to excuse the sub-par performance on youth and inexperience; unfortunately this film is only dated 4 years ago.
Well, sadly, something went very wrong here. Even sadder, the story/plot didn't even show up for work.
Can't wait to see you again... in a GOOD movie, Cosmo. I believe in you.
One last thing, the beautiful young woman in the hijab, (I think her name is Dela Meskienyar) she had a number of really great moments and clearly has talent. Keep up the good work. 😁👍
After the incredible success of "Shogun", and Cosmo's performance in it, I was soooo looking forward to watching this movie to see more of his work. I started an attempt to excuse the sub-par performance on youth and inexperience; unfortunately this film is only dated 4 years ago.
Well, sadly, something went very wrong here. Even sadder, the story/plot didn't even show up for work.
Can't wait to see you again... in a GOOD movie, Cosmo. I believe in you.
One last thing, the beautiful young woman in the hijab, (I think her name is Dela Meskienyar) she had a number of really great moments and clearly has talent. Keep up the good work. 😁👍
Lo sapevi?
- Colonne sonoreGive Me Life (Colors Verison)
Written by Simon Andersson (uncredited), Simon Lauridsen (uncredited), and Fine Jensen (uncredited)
Performed by Chinah
Courtesy of N03 / Colors Media UG
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Funny Face?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Забавное лицо
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 18.489 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti