Dopo quasi cinquanta anni di latitanza, Leatherface torna a terrorizzare un gruppo di giovani amici idealisti che accidentalmente sconvolgono il suo mondo accuratamente protetto in una remot... Leggi tuttoDopo quasi cinquanta anni di latitanza, Leatherface torna a terrorizzare un gruppo di giovani amici idealisti che accidentalmente sconvolgono il suo mondo accuratamente protetto in una remota cittadina del Texas.Dopo quasi cinquanta anni di latitanza, Leatherface torna a terrorizzare un gruppo di giovani amici idealisti che accidentalmente sconvolgono il suo mondo accuratamente protetto in una remota cittadina del Texas.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Olwen Fouéré
- Sally Hardesty
- (as Olwen Fouere)
John Larroquette
- Narrator
- (voce)
Shintaro Shimosawa
- Ron the Influencer
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
Whenever I watch a Texas Chainsaw Massacre sequel, I realize what makes the original 1974 film so iconic. This 2022 sequel is also a completely forgettable one, ideally made for instant consumption with not much to read into. The script is a bland mess - there's zero depth to any of the characters, including Leatherface himself. It doesn't even bother to show that Leatherface has been living in hiding all these years because he pops up exactly when you expect him to, unlike in the original where you gasp for a few moments. If you haven't watched the original, it will simply seem like a big, bulky guy randomly going on the run with a chainsaw in hand, chopping people. In my eyes, there's no Leatherface without the Sawyer family.
Where it does score a little is in the gore department. Some kills end up being a lot bloodier than you might think. But the payoff is so little I couldn't care less for any of the characters or the surface-level social commentary it offers. The bus scene is a gory delight, serving up a couple of minutes of good, old-fashioned slice & dice. The Sally Hardesty subplot is a replica of what they tried to do with Laurie Strode in the Halloween sequels, sans any texture. I loved Elsie Fisher in Eighth Grade, but this film doesn't even attempt to get anything out of her. The atmosphere too, didn't evoke Texas enough. I'm not exactly interested in another sequel to this, but I'd still watch it because of its connection to the original.
Where it does score a little is in the gore department. Some kills end up being a lot bloodier than you might think. But the payoff is so little I couldn't care less for any of the characters or the surface-level social commentary it offers. The bus scene is a gory delight, serving up a couple of minutes of good, old-fashioned slice & dice. The Sally Hardesty subplot is a replica of what they tried to do with Laurie Strode in the Halloween sequels, sans any texture. I loved Elsie Fisher in Eighth Grade, but this film doesn't even attempt to get anything out of her. The atmosphere too, didn't evoke Texas enough. I'm not exactly interested in another sequel to this, but I'd still watch it because of its connection to the original.
A geriatric lumberjack carves up a bunch of annoying internet influencers. Parts of it are outright laughable in how stupid the characters are behaving. I would normally root for the villain but not even this Leatherface deserves that.
Want to have a better time? Count the number of times the letter 'v' appears in the end credits.
Oh and as if I needed more proof that self-driving cars are dumb.
Want to have a better time? Count the number of times the letter 'v' appears in the end credits.
Oh and as if I needed more proof that self-driving cars are dumb.
Having been sheltered for half a century, Leatherface is back to cause more mayhem.
What can you say, I waited ages to see this film, I had really high expectations, kind of like those I had for Halloween 2018, only that was good, this certainly wasn't.
I'll start off with the positives, visually it's superb, beautifully shot, with some great location work, and some impressive scenes, I liked the music also, it wasn't overly done.
Sadly the positives are few and far between, if you watch the original, and followed it up with this, you'll see what a pale imitation this is.
On the downside, firstly, some of the acting isn't up to scratch, at times it had the made for TV feel about it, it perhaps doesn't feel deserving of the title.
The characters are just awful, Leatherface just seems so out of sorts, and as for the crows of youngsters seeking a better life, they're all just loathsome, none of them have any redeeming features. That scene where they all pull out their phones.... I know what I thought.
Fortunately it's not a long film, at just over ninety minutes.
Had the potential to be a good watch, it wasn't, 4/10.
What can you say, I waited ages to see this film, I had really high expectations, kind of like those I had for Halloween 2018, only that was good, this certainly wasn't.
I'll start off with the positives, visually it's superb, beautifully shot, with some great location work, and some impressive scenes, I liked the music also, it wasn't overly done.
Sadly the positives are few and far between, if you watch the original, and followed it up with this, you'll see what a pale imitation this is.
On the downside, firstly, some of the acting isn't up to scratch, at times it had the made for TV feel about it, it perhaps doesn't feel deserving of the title.
The characters are just awful, Leatherface just seems so out of sorts, and as for the crows of youngsters seeking a better life, they're all just loathsome, none of them have any redeeming features. That scene where they all pull out their phones.... I know what I thought.
Fortunately it's not a long film, at just over ninety minutes.
Had the potential to be a good watch, it wasn't, 4/10.
I was honestly quite impressed with the cinematography, production, and pacing of the first half, despite the silliness of the plot that was clearly a way of setting up a smorgasbord of fodder for Leatherface. And boy does he take advantage. Though the humanization of the character was palpable and refreshing, that all disintegrates in the second half, where the movie follows every horror trope and then one-ups it with the stupidest decisions, most obvious plot holes and a laughable absence of realism. In the first half however we have your typical local hick who's expected to be one of the antagonists but lo and behold he's actually a great guy. Many of the shots, especially the scene in the sunflower field, were just shy of beautiful in a grisly way. The whole bus scene was both funny in a satirical way, disturbingly gruesome, and yet what preceded it made absolutely zero sense. If only the flick stuck to its guns with the deviations from horror norms, it could've been a solid installment in this cesspool of a series.
Sally too emerges aft 50 years hibernation only to be thrown in a dumpster.
In Leatherface (2017), they showed a boy in an orphanage n how this boy descended into madness n later went on to become Leatherface. It was a true origin story n i liked it cos of its avoidance of tropes. The 2017 version has amazing star cast who gave memorable performances. It has top notch cinematography n heart pounding tension.
In this installment, Leatherface is hiding/hibernating after the events of the original 1974 version. How can u hide or hibernate for 50 years?
How is Leatherface still fit n healthy?
And how conveniently the chainsaw is hidden in the wall for all these 50 years without spoilage or rust.
And since when did Leatherface became supernatural?
How he survived those shot gun shootings n chainsaw attack is beyond me.
Generous with a 4 cos of its attachment n some very brutal scenes.
The two scenes, the hammer hitting the leg n the cop's elbow being broken, gave me creeps.
The face being smashed into pulpy watermelon was too much for me.
In Leatherface (2017), they showed a boy in an orphanage n how this boy descended into madness n later went on to become Leatherface. It was a true origin story n i liked it cos of its avoidance of tropes. The 2017 version has amazing star cast who gave memorable performances. It has top notch cinematography n heart pounding tension.
In this installment, Leatherface is hiding/hibernating after the events of the original 1974 version. How can u hide or hibernate for 50 years?
How is Leatherface still fit n healthy?
And how conveniently the chainsaw is hidden in the wall for all these 50 years without spoilage or rust.
And since when did Leatherface became supernatural?
How he survived those shot gun shootings n chainsaw attack is beyond me.
Generous with a 4 cos of its attachment n some very brutal scenes.
The two scenes, the hammer hitting the leg n the cop's elbow being broken, gave me creeps.
The face being smashed into pulpy watermelon was too much for me.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizJohn Larroquette narrates the opening of the film, as well as the original in 1974 and the remake in 2003.
- BlooperWhat makes Sally think Leatherface would know the name of her, her brother, and her friends, when he never heard their names in the original film? They were nothing but food to them.
- Citazioni
Guest on Bus: [records Leatherface on his phone] Try anything and you're cancelled, bro.
- Curiosità sui creditiThere is a post credit scene in which Leatherface walks towards the farmhouse.
- ConnessioniFeatured in The Cinema Snob: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (2022)
- Colonne sonorePrime Suspect
Written by Thomas Balmforth and Sam Taylor
Performed by Studio Musicians
Courtesy of APM Music
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Texas Chainsaw Massacre?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- La masacre de Texas
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 20.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 23min(83 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti