VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,8/10
9487
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Il viaggio trasformativo, esilarante ed edificante di una donna disadattata e ribelle fino a diventare una delle scrittrici più famose, enigmatiche e provocatorie del mondo, morta troppo pre... Leggi tuttoIl viaggio trasformativo, esilarante ed edificante di una donna disadattata e ribelle fino a diventare una delle scrittrici più famose, enigmatiche e provocatorie del mondo, morta troppo presto all'età di trent'anni.Il viaggio trasformativo, esilarante ed edificante di una donna disadattata e ribelle fino a diventare una delle scrittrici più famose, enigmatiche e provocatorie del mondo, morta troppo presto all'età di trent'anni.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 5 vittorie e 11 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Emily is a real shame as it is a film that had some great promise but failed to engage me.
This is largely because I felt like I was never actually let behind the curtain, and was kept at a frustrating distance from the characters. I never got under the skin of Emily, or any of the Bronte's really, and left the film with far more questions than answers. For a biopic, even a highly embellished one, this is unforgivable.
Given what the film was trying to achieve and the angle it took, I was surprised by how little emotion was stirred in me. I wanted to feel more watching this film but just never felt like I was part of it.
This lack of connection and emotion wasn't helped by the fact that the colour palette (whilst appropriate) was very bleak, the runtime was quite unforgiving, and the acting was rarely noteworthy.
Unfortunately all this adds up to create an unremarkable film about a remarkable woman. Which in itself is an impressive feat I suppose.
This is largely because I felt like I was never actually let behind the curtain, and was kept at a frustrating distance from the characters. I never got under the skin of Emily, or any of the Bronte's really, and left the film with far more questions than answers. For a biopic, even a highly embellished one, this is unforgivable.
Given what the film was trying to achieve and the angle it took, I was surprised by how little emotion was stirred in me. I wanted to feel more watching this film but just never felt like I was part of it.
This lack of connection and emotion wasn't helped by the fact that the colour palette (whilst appropriate) was very bleak, the runtime was quite unforgiving, and the acting was rarely noteworthy.
Unfortunately all this adds up to create an unremarkable film about a remarkable woman. Which in itself is an impressive feat I suppose.
"Emily", the debut directorial effort of English-Australian actor, Frances O'Connor, is focused on Emily Bronte from the late teens to the finishing of her only novel "Wuthering Heights". She was the middle of the three remarkable young ladies who made a mark on English literature in the mid 18th century. The movie is worth seeing for the trip back to the time and place, aided by the authentic Yorkshire setting and the excellent cinematography by Nanu Segal. Acting was generally good and Frances shows potential as a director. I felt it could have been a bit shorter and tighter. Music was pleasant and unobtrusive apart from a couple of times it built up to a portentous rumble
--and nothing happened.
Emma Mackey looked the part as the introverted but then wilful and free spirited Emily, the 'smouldering' nearing 11. Fionn Whitehead was fine as the wayward artist brother Branwell who was expected to be the shining light. The 'close' relationship between brother and Emily may be largely fiction as was the romance between Emily and the curate. There apparently was some sibling rivalry as suggested in the film, but that is endemic where there are siblings. And Charlotte did value Emily's work.
Despite the liberties with the story, I gained some feeling of the place and time, and more admiration for the achievements of those three young ladies in their brief allotted time. I shall re-read "Wuthering Heights".
Recapping the Brontes; There were 5 progeny. The 2 eldest girls died as children, probably from Tb and possibly helped by the privations of a dodgy 'charity school' for parsons' children. The famous trio were- Charlotte, 1816-1855, -"Jane Eyre"- died at 39.
Emily -"Wuthering Heights"-1818-1848, 30, Tb.
Anne -"Tenant of Wildfell Hall"- 1820-1849, 29, Tb.
One son, Patrick Branwell 1817-1855, 31, Tb.
Their mother died young. They were raised by the widowed parson father and an aunt.
Emma Mackey looked the part as the introverted but then wilful and free spirited Emily, the 'smouldering' nearing 11. Fionn Whitehead was fine as the wayward artist brother Branwell who was expected to be the shining light. The 'close' relationship between brother and Emily may be largely fiction as was the romance between Emily and the curate. There apparently was some sibling rivalry as suggested in the film, but that is endemic where there are siblings. And Charlotte did value Emily's work.
Despite the liberties with the story, I gained some feeling of the place and time, and more admiration for the achievements of those three young ladies in their brief allotted time. I shall re-read "Wuthering Heights".
Recapping the Brontes; There were 5 progeny. The 2 eldest girls died as children, probably from Tb and possibly helped by the privations of a dodgy 'charity school' for parsons' children. The famous trio were- Charlotte, 1816-1855, -"Jane Eyre"- died at 39.
Emily -"Wuthering Heights"-1818-1848, 30, Tb.
Anne -"Tenant of Wildfell Hall"- 1820-1849, 29, Tb.
One son, Patrick Branwell 1817-1855, 31, Tb.
Their mother died young. They were raised by the widowed parson father and an aunt.
Emma Mackey is really quite strong in this imagining of the life (and love) of "Wuthering Heights" author Emily Brontë. Portrayed as a rather shy and reluctant woman, she lives in the shadow of her successful teacher sister Charlotte (Alexandra Dowling) with her somewhat wayward brother Bramwell (Fionn Whitehead) under their outwardly imperious father Patrick (Adrian Dunbar). Remember this is set at a time when women were little more than chattels, and her father hoped that she would follow her sister into one of the few professions readily available to ladies of the day. The arrival of curate "Weightman" (Oliver Jackson-Cohen) causes many an heart to flutter and after a rocky start, the two begin to bond... This is a great looking film, shot at the original West Yorkshire home of the Brontë family and together with the almost biblical amounts of thunder and rain, the whole setting is effective in delivering a sense of just how this family lived their life in rural 19th century England. The cast work well together, there is an increasingly engaging - if somewhat bamboozling towards the end - chemistry between Mackey and OJC and there is a sparing degree of dialogue. The story is very much of the woman, and not so much of her writing, and it develops using a potent combination of the powerful score, bleak scenery, some humour - usually deriving from the antics of Bramwell - and from our own imagination, to make this so very different from many similar style period bio-dramas. I didn't think that pace was a problem, but it is a slow burn. The establishment of the characters takes it's time, so don't expect it to hit the grass running. That said, though, I found it a thoughtful and characterful depiction that smacks well of plausibility, love and of mortality, too.
First. The things I liked:
the music
the costumes
the fact that it was filmed in Haworth and roundabouts
it's beautifully shot.
However, it veered so far away from anything known about about Emily's character or known facts about the Brontes as to be hilarious!
Snogging your employer's wife in church in Victorian Yorkshire? I don't think so!
Some events and even names lifted straight from Wuthering Heights and presented as real life.
The extremely reserved Emily transformed into a raving hysterical nutter with attachment issues.
Emily and Wuthering Heightskerp inspiring film makers, but anything that does do either justice remains sadly elusive.
However, it veered so far away from anything known about about Emily's character or known facts about the Brontes as to be hilarious!
Snogging your employer's wife in church in Victorian Yorkshire? I don't think so!
Some events and even names lifted straight from Wuthering Heights and presented as real life.
The extremely reserved Emily transformed into a raving hysterical nutter with attachment issues.
Emily and Wuthering Heightskerp inspiring film makers, but anything that does do either justice remains sadly elusive.
Frances is a decent actress ..and technically she is semi decent director so far..but as a creator of art..she is far from it
we had many of those ( reimagining of famous authors lives ) in which these authors were seen through their works and made part of it.. the results were absurd always from ( shakespeare in love ) to ( becoming jane )..till this one.. these fictional works suggest a writer can not write anything not autobiographical ..that there is no such thing as imagination ! Or simply these authors lives were so boring unless we spice it up by a spicy love affair...that has no source in real life
actually the handsome curate in question has never been linked to this bronte AT ALL in any source.. rather it was the other tow who were allegedly connected to him ( as he was alleged to have been interested in anne in a platonic sort of way ) but alas .. all of this is so boring for todays public and creators.. so we make emily bronte something of a DH lawrence INSTEAD
I cant wait for tolstoy biography inspired by anna karenina ..next.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizActress Frances O'Connor's feature-film directorial debut.
- BlooperA first edition of "Wuthering Heights" is shown as being attributed to Emily Brontë. It was originally published under the pen name Ellis Bell and only appeared under her real name after her death.
- Citazioni
Emily Brontë: I do wonder though... how does God squeeze himself into all that rain? Won't he get wet?
- Colonne sonoreNocturne No. 2 in C Minor, H. 25
Written by John Field
Performed by Elizabeth Joy Roe
Courtesy of Decca Music Group Ltd
Under licence from Universal Music Operations Limited
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Emily?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 6.000.000 £ (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 1.097.067 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 40.287 USD
- 19 feb 2023
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 4.304.588 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 10 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti