VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,8/10
9521
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Il viaggio trasformativo, esilarante ed edificante di una donna disadattata e ribelle fino a diventare una delle scrittrici più famose, enigmatiche e provocatorie del mondo, morta troppo pre... Leggi tuttoIl viaggio trasformativo, esilarante ed edificante di una donna disadattata e ribelle fino a diventare una delle scrittrici più famose, enigmatiche e provocatorie del mondo, morta troppo presto all'età di trent'anni.Il viaggio trasformativo, esilarante ed edificante di una donna disadattata e ribelle fino a diventare una delle scrittrici più famose, enigmatiche e provocatorie del mondo, morta troppo presto all'età di trent'anni.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 5 vittorie e 11 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Frances is a decent actress ..and technically she is semi decent director so far..but as a creator of art..she is far from it
we had many of those ( reimagining of famous authors lives ) in which these authors were seen through their works and made part of it.. the results were absurd always from ( shakespeare in love ) to ( becoming jane )..till this one.. these fictional works suggest a writer can not write anything not autobiographical ..that there is no such thing as imagination ! Or simply these authors lives were so boring unless we spice it up by a spicy love affair...that has no source in real life
actually the handsome curate in question has never been linked to this bronte AT ALL in any source.. rather it was the other tow who were allegedly connected to him ( as he was alleged to have been interested in anne in a platonic sort of way ) but alas .. all of this is so boring for todays public and creators.. so we make emily bronte something of a DH lawrence INSTEAD
I cant wait for tolstoy biography inspired by anna karenina ..next.
Emma Mackey gives a strong performance as the central character in this drama; she is charismatic and beguiling, an emotional display (though at times this does stray into the histrionic). Whilst the director's intention is to provide a portrayal of the character and inspiration behind Emily Bronte, rather than a straight biopic, the amount of artistic licence used does undermine the credibility of the story. It is implied that the failed romance between Emily and the local curate provided the inspiration for Wuthering Heights, yet this romance did not happen; the characters in the story do not question the idea that the girls might want to become published writers - but society's prejudice at the time meant that they (and Mary-Anne Evans - George Eliot), all had to publish under male pseudonyms. Charlotte is portrayed as a prissy school ma'am - it's hard to imagine this person writing a classic like Jane Eyre. Ann, also a published novelist, is virtually written out of the story. It's a visually attractive film, but unconvincing, and ultimately, rather disappointing.
What a wicked, wicked film this is and the depths to which non-academics misunderstand Wuthering Heights reeks throughout this lush and engaging period drama.
Emily Bronte never had an affair, she never married, and she is quoted in an earlier biopic from 1979 in her preference for friendship over the fleeting illusion of romance, in her preference for holly over wild dog's roses.
Wuthering Heights is many things but it has never been a silly romance novel. The first thirty pages or so are hilarious pitch black comedy, making a mockery of middle class manners in the rudeness and brutal company of "the inmates of Wuthering Heights."
As the story of Heathcliff and Cathy unfolds, it becomes readily apparent that Heathcliff is a full blown sociopath and Cathy is criticized for throwing her life away on him. The last 200 pages of the book feature a psychopathically evil Heathcliff, a dead Cathy, and a rather obvious derision of their unholy union in favor of other characters like Nelly Dean and Cathy's daughter Catherine.
Someone who doesn't have the background in literature to understand the novel should definitely not be making a movie about Emily Bronte's life, but it's a fun film if you can get over the horror of the blatant lies.
Emily Bronte never had an affair, she never married, and she is quoted in an earlier biopic from 1979 in her preference for friendship over the fleeting illusion of romance, in her preference for holly over wild dog's roses.
Wuthering Heights is many things but it has never been a silly romance novel. The first thirty pages or so are hilarious pitch black comedy, making a mockery of middle class manners in the rudeness and brutal company of "the inmates of Wuthering Heights."
As the story of Heathcliff and Cathy unfolds, it becomes readily apparent that Heathcliff is a full blown sociopath and Cathy is criticized for throwing her life away on him. The last 200 pages of the book feature a psychopathically evil Heathcliff, a dead Cathy, and a rather obvious derision of their unholy union in favor of other characters like Nelly Dean and Cathy's daughter Catherine.
Someone who doesn't have the background in literature to understand the novel should definitely not be making a movie about Emily Bronte's life, but it's a fun film if you can get over the horror of the blatant lies.
First. The things I liked:
the music
the costumes
the fact that it was filmed in Haworth and roundabouts
it's beautifully shot.
However, it veered so far away from anything known about about Emily's character or known facts about the Brontes as to be hilarious!
Snogging your employer's wife in church in Victorian Yorkshire? I don't think so!
Some events and even names lifted straight from Wuthering Heights and presented as real life.
The extremely reserved Emily transformed into a raving hysterical nutter with attachment issues.
Emily and Wuthering Heightskerp inspiring film makers, but anything that does do either justice remains sadly elusive.
However, it veered so far away from anything known about about Emily's character or known facts about the Brontes as to be hilarious!
Snogging your employer's wife in church in Victorian Yorkshire? I don't think so!
Some events and even names lifted straight from Wuthering Heights and presented as real life.
The extremely reserved Emily transformed into a raving hysterical nutter with attachment issues.
Emily and Wuthering Heightskerp inspiring film makers, but anything that does do either justice remains sadly elusive.
Emily is a great period drama that announces writer/director Frances O'Connor as someone with clear talent and one to watch and further proves lead actress Emma Mackey's burgeoning stardom with a story that's funny, tragic and full of natural beauty.
Emma Mackey gives a true tour de force performance, earnestly portraying Emily's shy nature and vivid imagination whilst also having an infectious rapport with Fionn Whitehead (great) and some truly fiery chemistry with Oliver Jackson-Cohen (also great).
Frances O'Connor's direction is excellent, utilising handheld camera work to great effect with some very stylish framing but it does overuse cutting to black. The music by Abel Korzeniowski is amazing, beautifully balancing moments of whimsy with a more classical score.
Emma Mackey gives a true tour de force performance, earnestly portraying Emily's shy nature and vivid imagination whilst also having an infectious rapport with Fionn Whitehead (great) and some truly fiery chemistry with Oliver Jackson-Cohen (also great).
Frances O'Connor's direction is excellent, utilising handheld camera work to great effect with some very stylish framing but it does overuse cutting to black. The music by Abel Korzeniowski is amazing, beautifully balancing moments of whimsy with a more classical score.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizActress Frances O'Connor's feature-film directorial debut.
- BlooperA first edition of "Wuthering Heights" is shown as being attributed to Emily Brontë. It was originally published under the pen name Ellis Bell and only appeared under her real name after her death.
- Citazioni
Emily Brontë: I do wonder though... how does God squeeze himself into all that rain? Won't he get wet?
- Colonne sonoreNocturne No. 2 in C Minor, H. 25
Written by John Field
Performed by Elizabeth Joy Roe
Courtesy of Decca Music Group Ltd
Under licence from Universal Music Operations Limited
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Emily?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 6.000.000 £ (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 1.097.067 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 40.287 USD
- 19 feb 2023
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 4.304.588 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 10min(130 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti