Return of the Ghostbusters
- 2007
- 1h 25min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,2/10
1257
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaThe Ghost Adventures crew return to tackle the terrors of the night.The Ghost Adventures crew return to tackle the terrors of the night.The Ghost Adventures crew return to tackle the terrors of the night.
B.J. Eaton
- Konstin's Assistant
- (as Brandon Eaton)
K.C. Weatherman
- Homeless Joe
- (as KC Weatherman)
Ethan S. Knightchilde
- Network Producer
- (as Ethan Knightchilde)
Tanner L. Cole
- Building Superintendent
- (as Tanner Cole)
Recensioni in evidenza
I'm a science fiction and horror movie fan and well yes I loved the original Ghostbusters when I was a youth, but compared to the tons of fan film material that were based on the Star Wars series, this was much, much better. I was even frightened watching it, you know, the subtle way! I couldn't get my eyes from the screen!
Mostly everything was very good or gorgeous: -The FX were better than in many a commercial TV series. -The acting was very, very good. My special compliments to the "bad guy"!!! -The cuts were wow! -The dialogues were awesome, my god, who wrote the script? Reitman and Ramis personally?
Yeah, the main characters are kind of like the original ones, but they got this new "russian" guy also and so the casting is an overall good compromise between old and new.
Will somebody please give these guys a TV series? Man, these guys belong in the showbiz!
Mostly everything was very good or gorgeous: -The FX were better than in many a commercial TV series. -The acting was very, very good. My special compliments to the "bad guy"!!! -The cuts were wow! -The dialogues were awesome, my god, who wrote the script? Reitman and Ramis personally?
Yeah, the main characters are kind of like the original ones, but they got this new "russian" guy also and so the casting is an overall good compromise between old and new.
Will somebody please give these guys a TV series? Man, these guys belong in the showbiz!
That would be an understatement.
Never before, in the history of fan-film-making, has there been such dedication and passion put into a film that would yield NO financial benefits whatsoever. This was a film (video, movie, whatever) put together BY fans, FOR fans, period. If you liked Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II, you'd be hard pressed not to believe that this was Ghostbusters III.
The cast, those returning from 'Freddy Vs. Ghostbusters' and the newcomers, really pull this piece together. I especially thought that Wiess gave an amazing performance.
How many fan-films can boast original music? Well, Jon Vandergriff, along with a few other contributors, make this one a first! The score to this film, from the opening credits, to the ending ones, is nothing short of fantastic.
Now let's talk about the special FX. Wow. When you watch this film, you understand that it is a film made with limited money, resources, and materials, but that's the LAST thing you think when you see the FX. The crew behind the visual fx in 'Return' did their jobs, and they did it well.
I could go on and on, but the bottom line is that this is an amazing film, as both a fanfilm and a standalone film. It is better than its predecessor in every way (don't get me wrong, I love FvGB).
SEE IT.
Never before, in the history of fan-film-making, has there been such dedication and passion put into a film that would yield NO financial benefits whatsoever. This was a film (video, movie, whatever) put together BY fans, FOR fans, period. If you liked Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II, you'd be hard pressed not to believe that this was Ghostbusters III.
The cast, those returning from 'Freddy Vs. Ghostbusters' and the newcomers, really pull this piece together. I especially thought that Wiess gave an amazing performance.
How many fan-films can boast original music? Well, Jon Vandergriff, along with a few other contributors, make this one a first! The score to this film, from the opening credits, to the ending ones, is nothing short of fantastic.
Now let's talk about the special FX. Wow. When you watch this film, you understand that it is a film made with limited money, resources, and materials, but that's the LAST thing you think when you see the FX. The crew behind the visual fx in 'Return' did their jobs, and they did it well.
I could go on and on, but the bottom line is that this is an amazing film, as both a fanfilm and a standalone film. It is better than its predecessor in every way (don't get me wrong, I love FvGB).
SEE IT.
I actually watch both pieces by BraxtranFILM but this in particular movie was pretty good coming from an independent film, and yeah I mean with the no 3rd G.B. ever ever ever ever, you'd have to expect it to come from a huge fan. However I felt this wasn't just a fan made movie, I felt this was someone that wanted to really keep true to the Ghostbusters and what it was about. I do have to say that some of it was a bit cheesy and could of done with a bit less, or maybe it might of been some of the actors doing what they did. But I feel for the kinda budget they probably had, they did a marvelous job bring back to life one great classic.
Having watched the film dozens of times (for studying purposes), it becomes clear that one should not expect a $144M budget type of movie. Instead, for $3,000, all the heart and fun that stretched dollars can afford are put on screen.
The film sure has its cheesy moments and it has to be expected instead of hoping for a miracle. And in some ways, this fan film is sort of a miracle in itself. You have quirky characters, a clichéd villain, the reporter (who reminded me a lot of TMNT's April O'Neil for some reason) and a few great action scenes for the tight budget they had.
The camera work is interesting and is much more determined to shoot a cool looking scene than most fan films I've seen lying around. Not that they're any bad, but it's nice to dissect them and try and see where there are a few problems, where scenes could be trimmed, etc.
This film could have used a bit of trimming or a few extra takes instead of keeping a scene where the same word can be heard two or three times. Not to be picky, it just creates a redundancy that slowly can cripple the narrative when repeated too many times. Although I'm sure these were most unintentional and they do not hinder my fun of watching it.
Knowing that this is a low budget production, I was pleasantly surprised to see the amount of accuracy, the fun, the efforts to try and tell an original story, to have a few references to the original Ghostbusters while also covering its own grounds. The film does mention some of the original characters, but that's where the movie gets some of its best fun: talking about other fictional characters, thus making them seem more real, as well as the Ghostbusters name and the overall story at the same time.
It's not a Stanley Kubrick film, and it's not a Rolland Emmerich film either. It's a Hank Braxtan film. The man wrote and directed it and before that, he did the same with "Freddy VS. Ghostbusters", another fun short film featuring some of the characters seen in "Return".
For doing all this by himself, and for the fun results I still enjoy to this day, I'd say he's more than earned my eternal respect.
The film sure has its cheesy moments and it has to be expected instead of hoping for a miracle. And in some ways, this fan film is sort of a miracle in itself. You have quirky characters, a clichéd villain, the reporter (who reminded me a lot of TMNT's April O'Neil for some reason) and a few great action scenes for the tight budget they had.
The camera work is interesting and is much more determined to shoot a cool looking scene than most fan films I've seen lying around. Not that they're any bad, but it's nice to dissect them and try and see where there are a few problems, where scenes could be trimmed, etc.
This film could have used a bit of trimming or a few extra takes instead of keeping a scene where the same word can be heard two or three times. Not to be picky, it just creates a redundancy that slowly can cripple the narrative when repeated too many times. Although I'm sure these were most unintentional and they do not hinder my fun of watching it.
Knowing that this is a low budget production, I was pleasantly surprised to see the amount of accuracy, the fun, the efforts to try and tell an original story, to have a few references to the original Ghostbusters while also covering its own grounds. The film does mention some of the original characters, but that's where the movie gets some of its best fun: talking about other fictional characters, thus making them seem more real, as well as the Ghostbusters name and the overall story at the same time.
It's not a Stanley Kubrick film, and it's not a Rolland Emmerich film either. It's a Hank Braxtan film. The man wrote and directed it and before that, he did the same with "Freddy VS. Ghostbusters", another fun short film featuring some of the characters seen in "Return".
For doing all this by himself, and for the fun results I still enjoy to this day, I'd say he's more than earned my eternal respect.
WOW...VERY IPRESSIVE.
for $3000, you made a very impressive movie...
How you did it, I don't know...but that is talent.
Yes there were some flaws, not in storyline but in overall production, but on something of this caliber, that is easily overlooked.
For most part, actors had no prior film experience...and while it showed abit, is still better than any movies I've seen made in the multi-millions.
Your true talent shines...and I look forward to seeing other films by you.
I realize that this is not on DVD, but only online due to legal matters, but having a feature film on DVD should be seriously considered.
I tend to spend that amount of money in one weekend without hesitation...but you know how to really work with it.
I should be investing in your company, as you guys really have the skills that so many Hollywood writers, actors, producers, directors and crew lack.
The only parts in this movie that really didn't fit - was the bar fight scene and the odd cursing - that was really out of place along with the MILF comment.
Aside all, your special FX, costumes, score, camera work and editing were pretty damn good.
As from your resumes, most of your work comes from self produced films, it's time to breakout into a higher budget and have your work shown across the public.
I don't know how many movies I've watched where I was so unimpressed - they had major "stars", big money and all the tools available - backed up by a major production company and they still came out with something that I would not rate above a 3.
You guys have what it takes and lets hope that you never lose it.
I can only imagine what you all could do with a 20 million plus budget...
Good luck, great job and keep them rolling.
I gave this a 9 because of all the effort combined with the ability to work with such a small budget and complete something worth viewing. While this is not at the top of my favorites, it does show plenty of promise and a well done job.
The song at the closing credits fit totally.
for $3000, you made a very impressive movie...
How you did it, I don't know...but that is talent.
Yes there were some flaws, not in storyline but in overall production, but on something of this caliber, that is easily overlooked.
For most part, actors had no prior film experience...and while it showed abit, is still better than any movies I've seen made in the multi-millions.
Your true talent shines...and I look forward to seeing other films by you.
I realize that this is not on DVD, but only online due to legal matters, but having a feature film on DVD should be seriously considered.
I tend to spend that amount of money in one weekend without hesitation...but you know how to really work with it.
I should be investing in your company, as you guys really have the skills that so many Hollywood writers, actors, producers, directors and crew lack.
The only parts in this movie that really didn't fit - was the bar fight scene and the odd cursing - that was really out of place along with the MILF comment.
Aside all, your special FX, costumes, score, camera work and editing were pretty damn good.
As from your resumes, most of your work comes from self produced films, it's time to breakout into a higher budget and have your work shown across the public.
I don't know how many movies I've watched where I was so unimpressed - they had major "stars", big money and all the tools available - backed up by a major production company and they still came out with something that I would not rate above a 3.
You guys have what it takes and lets hope that you never lose it.
I can only imagine what you all could do with a 20 million plus budget...
Good luck, great job and keep them rolling.
I gave this a 9 because of all the effort combined with the ability to work with such a small budget and complete something worth viewing. While this is not at the top of my favorites, it does show plenty of promise and a well done job.
The song at the closing credits fit totally.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis film was made on a budget of around $3,000.00, and took over eight months to shoot. Two CGI artists worked for another eighteen months to complete the film's more than 200 effects shots.
- Citazioni
Neil Anderson: What the hell do know about woman anyway?
Pavel Karnov: Woman are just like confidence. Watch this. Hello, lady. I know someone who wants to beat your ass.
Girl at Bar: Oh, yeah? Who?
Pavel Karnov: My balls.
Girl at Bar: You're cute.
Pavel Karnov: See?
Neil Anderson: You gotta be shitting me, man. That's the worst line I've ever heard.
- ConnessioniFollowed by Ghostbusters SLC (2010)
- Colonne sonoreSoul 2 Soul
Written and Performed by Riverseed
copyright 2007 RS
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Возвращение охотников за привидениями
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti