VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,0/10
6342
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una giovane donna corteggia un misterioso ricco uomo nell'Inghilterra del XIX secolo.Una giovane donna corteggia un misterioso ricco uomo nell'Inghilterra del XIX secolo.Una giovane donna corteggia un misterioso ricco uomo nell'Inghilterra del XIX secolo.
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 4 candidature totali
Sope Dirisu
- Mr. Malcolm
- (as Sope Dìrísù)
Sianad Gregory
- Molly
- (as Siânad Gregory)
Emma Willis
- Lucy
- (as Emma Lou Willis)
Recensioni in evidenza
I had nooooooo intention of seeing another period-piece but my wife wanted to see it. Actually, it was a decent movie. At times, some of the characters were a bit stilted, timing was a bit off, chemistry/dynamics didn't quite connect and there was probably a bit more drama (overacting) with some of the characters the actors were supposed to play. On the flip slide, there were many scenes that were quite well done, and there was a bit of extra/added subtlety about the story line throughout the movie. Good movie for $5 Tuesday or DVD.
Just watched this movie; it did not live up to the hype. While the costuming, sets and cinematography were really good, the plot was so derivitive, predictable and unimaginative it angered me after viewing.
One of the classifications on this film is "comedy." I'll admit the septuagenarian exchange made me laugh out loud, but there were few example of wit in this film.
Bring Georgette Heyer to cinema life, for crying out loud. Her depth of knowledge -- from Regency mannerisms, phrasing, street and sect cant, from glitz to gutter, was due to investigation and extensive research. Also, her knowledge of the social and global conditions during the Regency period were woven into her pieces with great effect.
Ms. Heyer's writing is elegant, thoughtful, and her between-character dialogue/repartee is incomparable, whether in a London drawing room, a Bath water house, a backstreet brothel or on the battlefields of Waterloo. Her characters are fully-drawn and replete.
Developers: Please provide substantive content if venturing into Regency.
One of the classifications on this film is "comedy." I'll admit the septuagenarian exchange made me laugh out loud, but there were few example of wit in this film.
Bring Georgette Heyer to cinema life, for crying out loud. Her depth of knowledge -- from Regency mannerisms, phrasing, street and sect cant, from glitz to gutter, was due to investigation and extensive research. Also, her knowledge of the social and global conditions during the Regency period were woven into her pieces with great effect.
Ms. Heyer's writing is elegant, thoughtful, and her between-character dialogue/repartee is incomparable, whether in a London drawing room, a Bath water house, a backstreet brothel or on the battlefields of Waterloo. Her characters are fully-drawn and replete.
Developers: Please provide substantive content if venturing into Regency.
Novelists who adapt their own work to the screen sometimes run the risk of being unable to "kill their babies." Fortunately, Ms. Alain's had no such qualms. Her screenplay is a delight. Director Emma Holly Jones maintains the scope and literary scale of the novel, as well as the wit, charm, and romance expected of Regency-era productions. Taking a cue from the wildly successful Bridgerton series, casting is inclusive and revelatory. Who isn't thrilled to see the lovely Ms Pinto in Austeneseque attire and a plot rife with scheming intrigue? Twenty-first century novelists are enriching a beloved genre with new stories. Here's to the women behind the camera and the women behind the pen.
'' Mr. Malcolm's List '' is a period romantic drama.
The movie has a fun story, based on a novel with the same title, and the whole story brings in mind Jane Austen vibes.
In addition, the characters were fun and feisty and their chemistry was strong and enjoyable. The performances by every actor and actress in the cast, which were all enjoyable, aided to the success of the movie.
And yes the casting is unrealistic for a period drama, but, as the performances were strong and the settings and costumes spot on, so it can be easily overlooked.
Finally, the movie did a good job presenting the story.
The movie has a fun story, based on a novel with the same title, and the whole story brings in mind Jane Austen vibes.
In addition, the characters were fun and feisty and their chemistry was strong and enjoyable. The performances by every actor and actress in the cast, which were all enjoyable, aided to the success of the movie.
And yes the casting is unrealistic for a period drama, but, as the performances were strong and the settings and costumes spot on, so it can be easily overlooked.
Finally, the movie did a good job presenting the story.
1818 - When Julia (Zawe Ashton) is rejected by London's most eligible bachelor, Mr Malcolm (Sope Dirisu) because she doesn't get a tick next to every item on his potential wife list, Julia seeks revenge for the humiliation. To do this, she, and her reluctant cousin (Oliver Jackson-Cohen) persuade friend Selina (Freida Pinto) to trick Malcolm by chatting him up so she can ultimately reject him with her own list. Inevitably, she falls for him.
Whilst the Jane Austen comparisons are inevitable and to a degree justified, this is a sweet, witty story of love, society, manners etc boasting a terrific cast. Pinto is perfect, as is Ashton whilst Jackson-Cohen is hilarious as the man scared of horses and determined not to get dragged into Ashton's scheme and failing. One point, if I'm honest, whilst Dirisu is a fine actor, I'm not sure he was quite right for the 'Darcy' role.
Whilst the Jane Austen comparisons are inevitable and to a degree justified, this is a sweet, witty story of love, society, manners etc boasting a terrific cast. Pinto is perfect, as is Ashton whilst Jackson-Cohen is hilarious as the man scared of horses and determined not to get dragged into Ashton's scheme and failing. One point, if I'm honest, whilst Dirisu is a fine actor, I'm not sure he was quite right for the 'Darcy' role.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe house where Frieda Pinto's character lives is the same house where Anne Hathaway's character lived in 'Becoming Jane'.
- BlooperIn the dancing scene when a waltz is called none of the principal characters actually dance the waltz, which is a rather rigid form in 3/4 time that first became popular in Austria or Germany in the 1770s-1780s. In fact the diegetic music sort of fades out and becomes 4/4 background music to which the characters dance as a far-too-modern mundane 'slow-dance' number typical of the 1980s or later.
- Citazioni
Julia Thistlewaite: So, what did he say about me?
Selina Dalton: Um, merely that he escorted you to the opera. I must admit, Julia, that does not seem such a heinous crime.
Julia Thistlewaite: Did he tell you about my eyelashes?
- Curiosità sui creditiThe end credits are accompanied by caricature illustrations as mentioned in the plot.
- ConnessioniRemake of Mr. Malcolm's List (2019)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Mr. Malcolm's List?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- La lista di Mr Malcolm
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 1.885.718 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 810.742 USD
- 3 lug 2022
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 2.024.507 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 57min(117 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti