D'Artagnan è costretto a unire le forze con Milady per salvare Constance, che è stata rapita davanti ai suoi occhi.D'Artagnan è costretto a unire le forze con Milady per salvare Constance, che è stata rapita davanti ai suoi occhi.D'Artagnan è costretto a unire le forze con Milady per salvare Constance, che è stata rapita davanti ai suoi occhi.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 8 candidature totali
Julien Frison
- Gaston de France
- (as Julien Frison de la Comédie Française)
Recensioni in evidenza
Well.. Since watching the first installment I really looked forward to this. The first one was everything I could ask for from a classic swashbuckling adventure.
However, this left me with a kind of unsatisfying feeling but there were a lot of positives too.
The scenery and atmosphere and general is great. Everything I could ask for. And Eva Green.. What an actress she is.. I know she usually plays mysterious villains but still. She's just good.
In general I enjoyed the acting as well. Maybe not great from everyone but the characters were ok.
But then the plot and the climax.. I still don't know what was really going on and from what I've read I am not alone in that. I believe they changed a lot from the book as well which messed it up more than it should have (never read it but I will).
I will watch it again some day though to maybe get a better understanding and possibly after reading the book to at least know the core of the story a bit better.
Still watchable but could have been better.
However, this left me with a kind of unsatisfying feeling but there were a lot of positives too.
The scenery and atmosphere and general is great. Everything I could ask for. And Eva Green.. What an actress she is.. I know she usually plays mysterious villains but still. She's just good.
In general I enjoyed the acting as well. Maybe not great from everyone but the characters were ok.
But then the plot and the climax.. I still don't know what was really going on and from what I've read I am not alone in that. I believe they changed a lot from the book as well which messed it up more than it should have (never read it but I will).
I will watch it again some day though to maybe get a better understanding and possibly after reading the book to at least know the core of the story a bit better.
Still watchable but could have been better.
Part 2 of the current film adaptation is by no means a bad film, thanks to the actors, budget and, of course, the literary source material. Nevertheless, it falls well short of its predecessor, not least because of the high expectations following the first film. What's missing this time? A certain freshness, the haunting presence of the protagonists, their actually indispensable interaction, memorable climaxes. Content now rules here, almost too much for the running time, instead of fun.
Eva Green gives an outstanding performance in her parade role as the femme fatale, this time making the important and correct decision that less is often more.
Eva Green gives an outstanding performance in her parade role as the femme fatale, this time making the important and correct decision that less is often more.
It's good to return to the big screen, connect again with the magic of the dark room and much better to do it with a film that captivates you from beginning to end.
The second part of the great project led by Martin Bourboulon is much more vibrant, fast-paced and entertaining, with a narrative rhythm that does not falter at any time, but does not leave plot gaps either. The dramatic arc of the characters is much more solid and clear, Vincent Cassel as always does not need many minutes to demonstrate his stage presence, François Civil finishes shaping a rising D'Artagnan, but who steals the screen every time he appears is Eva Green, who from start to finish makes a truly impeccable hero-villain game.
A real pleasure to enjoy an epic film project far from the great arms of Hollywood.
The second part of the great project led by Martin Bourboulon is much more vibrant, fast-paced and entertaining, with a narrative rhythm that does not falter at any time, but does not leave plot gaps either. The dramatic arc of the characters is much more solid and clear, Vincent Cassel as always does not need many minutes to demonstrate his stage presence, François Civil finishes shaping a rising D'Artagnan, but who steals the screen every time he appears is Eva Green, who from start to finish makes a truly impeccable hero-villain game.
A real pleasure to enjoy an epic film project far from the great arms of Hollywood.
Once again a tremendous spectacle, served with a bunch of very fine actors ("la fine fleur" of French actors) in all their glory, who make most of the scenes of the movie a tasty delight to savour... In particular the highly charismatic Eva Green and François Civil, who both have this magnetic presence that makes you wanna follow each of their adventures (each of the moments they share are captivating)...
The staging and overall design of the movie is as majestically pleasing as in the First Part (both movies were shot at the same time) with very gorgeous framings and lightings (wonderfully mastered)... The action and stunts do the job (in spite of this recurring shaky camera), with a few cool bits (hats off to the final confrontation).
Of course the stakes -even if already pretty high at some point in the First Part- are even higher here... Numerous events in this Second Part mirror events recounted in the First Part ; the situation is pretty tight for the main players, and the whole -mysterious- intrigue gets thicker and tastier as it evolves... With Milady playing a pivotal role in everything ; even when she is not here, her shadow never is very far... But things, during the entire movie, don't really go as expected, twists after twists...
In the end, this two-parter story definitely is a pretty gem in the long history of French Cinema, because it shows the nice will to produce a pleasing cinematic piece, à la française ; but in a fashion that uses some of the welcome contempory/modern tools.
A fine and tasty adventure to watch, and potentially a Third Part to come (?)
The staging and overall design of the movie is as majestically pleasing as in the First Part (both movies were shot at the same time) with very gorgeous framings and lightings (wonderfully mastered)... The action and stunts do the job (in spite of this recurring shaky camera), with a few cool bits (hats off to the final confrontation).
Of course the stakes -even if already pretty high at some point in the First Part- are even higher here... Numerous events in this Second Part mirror events recounted in the First Part ; the situation is pretty tight for the main players, and the whole -mysterious- intrigue gets thicker and tastier as it evolves... With Milady playing a pivotal role in everything ; even when she is not here, her shadow never is very far... But things, during the entire movie, don't really go as expected, twists after twists...
In the end, this two-parter story definitely is a pretty gem in the long history of French Cinema, because it shows the nice will to produce a pleasing cinematic piece, à la française ; but in a fashion that uses some of the welcome contempory/modern tools.
A fine and tasty adventure to watch, and potentially a Third Part to come (?)
"The Three Musketeers" by Alexandre Dumas comes to life in the cinematic adaptation, which, while deviating in some details from the book, manages to preserve the original work's essence. The story follows D'Artagnan and his loyal friends, Athos, Porthos, and Aramis, in a captivating 17th-century setting. Political intrigues, thrilling duels, and secret romances intertwine as they battle against the cunning Cardinal Richelieu and the enigmatic Milady de Winter. Although poetic licenses result in more battles than in the book, the film successfully captures the spirit of adventure, action, and romance that has made this classic swashbuckling tale endure.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe film was shot back to back with its prequel I tre moschettieri - D'Artagnan (2023) for a total shoot of 150 days that started on August 16, 2021 and wrapped on June 3, 2022.
- BlooperAt different moments both movies feature firearms. These are incorrect. Actually, they are 150 years ahead, given the action is supposed to take place in 1627. The hand-weapons and riffles are revolutionary/Napoleonic era. Under Louis XIII's reign, firearms were much more rudimentary.
- ConnessioniFollows I tre moschettieri - D'Artagnan (2023)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Three Musketeers - Part II: Milady?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Los Tres Mosqueteros: Milady
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 36.000.000 € (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 15.439.299 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 55min(115 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.41 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti