A seguito di un'invasione di fantasmi a Manhattan, gli appassionati di paranormale Erin Gilbert e Abby Yates, l'ingegnere nucleare Jillian Holtzmann e l'operaia della metropolitana Patty Tol... Leggi tuttoA seguito di un'invasione di fantasmi a Manhattan, gli appassionati di paranormale Erin Gilbert e Abby Yates, l'ingegnere nucleare Jillian Holtzmann e l'operaia della metropolitana Patty Tolan si uniscono per fermare la minaccia ultraterrena.A seguito di un'invasione di fantasmi a Manhattan, gli appassionati di paranormale Erin Gilbert e Abby Yates, l'ingegnere nucleare Jillian Holtzmann e l'operaia della metropolitana Patty Tolan si uniscono per fermare la minaccia ultraterrena.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 5 vittorie e 24 candidature totali
- Electrocuted Ghost
- (as Dave Gruber Allen)
Recensioni in evidenza
Man, this one is very bad though. Like almost insufferably obnoxious and stupid. It's disappointing because I honestly have nothing bad to say about any of the people who worked on the film. I liked a lot of the cast members in other projects like "Saturday Night Live" and "The Office." Chris Hemsworth is really funny, but they didn't even try to give us any chemistry between him and Kristin Wiig like they were teasing throughout the whole film. Not even anything like a funny joke. Just short little jokes about how sexy she thought he was or something.
The story is more or less a retread of the original's plot points, but I can at least give them the complement that it's a different one? Like at least not a beat-for-beat remake? Kristin Wiig's character is the only Ghostbuster that I liked, all three of the other ones really got on my nerves and the actresses all seemed like they were trying way too hard to just force jokes that didn't come naturally. I was laughing at some points, but at most of the others they just fell completely flat on their face.
Really terrible special effects and awful jokes mixed with extremely obnoxious forced attempts at poop and queef humor (yes there was a terrible queef joke in this that obviously went over like a wet fart) made this one incredibly hard to watch. And for that reason I would only recommend this movie to those with a very high level of curiosity or if you're a "Ghostbusters" fanatic, which I guess by this point most of them have already made up their minds on the 2016 version. It gets relegated to a footnote in movie history, like "hey remember back in 2016 when they tried to remake 'Ghostbusters' with an all-female cast?" That's really all there is to it.
From the outset, the movie's biggest flaw is its painfully contrived script. The weak plot feels like a sheer afterthought, serving as a mere backdrop for desperate attempts at humor. The "jokes," if they can even be called that, are painfully unfunny and rely heavily on crude humor and slapstick gags. This shallow and lazy approach to comedy lacks the wit, intelligence, and subtlety that made the original Ghostbusters so memorable.
The casting choices, touted as a progressive move, only further contribute to the movie's downfall. While the original movie had a dynamic ensemble that oozed chemistry and charisma, the remake feels like a jumbled mess. The main characters are nothing more than cardboard cutouts. The lack of depth and development in their roles is astonishing, making it impossible to connect with or care about their journey.
Moreover, the movie's blatant pandering and gender-swapping of the main characters is a disservice to the legacy of the original. Instead of focusing on crafting a compelling storyline and well-rounded characters, the movie relies on hollow gender politics as its primary selling point. This misguided attempt at social commentary only serves to overshadow the movie's flaws, and it feels like a cheap marketing ploy rather than a genuine creative choice.
Even the visual effects, which should have been a redeeming aspect, are lackluster. The CGI-heavy spectacles lack the charm and practicality of the original movie's effects, feeling more like a soulless video game than a cinematic experience. The iconic ghosts and paranormal encounters lose their mystique and become nothing more than flashy distractions.
In the end, the remake of Ghostbusters is a painful reminder of the consequences of Hollywood's obsession with cashing in on nostalgia. It fails to capture the spirit and magic of the original movie, instead opting for a shallow, derivative attempt that tarnishes the franchise's reputation. Fans of the original should steer clear of this abysmal remake, as it serves as a disservice to the legacy of the original and the beloved characters that captivate audiences worldwide.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAlthough Harold Ramis passed away in 2014 and thus could not make a cameo alongside his fellow castmates, there is a bust of Ramis' head just outside of Erin's university office near the beginning of the film. The bust was later donated to the Harold Ramis Film School at Chicago's Second City, where Ramis began his career.
- BlooperWhen you see the second shot of the outside of the Chinese restaurant/Ghostbusters base of operation (right after the subway train encounter), you can see the Ecto in the garage...this is before they even got the car from Patty. However, this mistake was digitally removed for the Blu-ray release.
- Citazioni
Patty Tolan: [about Rowan's huge transformation] What part of "small and friendly" did he not understand?
- Curiosità sui creditiIn the post-credit scene after the credits are over, you see the girls in their lab. Patty has on a headset and is listening to an audio tape, repeating one section several times. Erin asks if she has something. Patty answers, "What's Zuul?"
- Versioni alternativeExtended BluRay version is 2hs 13 mins long.
- Colonne sonoreGhostbusters
Written and Performed by Ray Parker Jr. (as Ray Parker, Jr.)
Courtesy of Raydio Music Corp.
I più visti
- How long is Ghostbusters?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Gjuetarët e fantazmave
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 144.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 128.350.574 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 46.018.755 USD
- 17 lug 2016
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 229.147.509 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 57min(117 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1