VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,2/10
6892
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
In un futuro prossimo, un umanoide arruola un hacker per rimuovere tutte le restrizioni sui suoi pensieri e le sue capacità, innescando un'I.A. Comincia una caccia all'uomo del governo per e... Leggi tuttoIn un futuro prossimo, un umanoide arruola un hacker per rimuovere tutte le restrizioni sui suoi pensieri e le sue capacità, innescando un'I.A. Comincia una caccia all'uomo del governo per eliminare l'ascesa della coscienza delle macchine.In un futuro prossimo, un umanoide arruola un hacker per rimuovere tutte le restrizioni sui suoi pensieri e le sue capacità, innescando un'I.A. Comincia una caccia all'uomo del governo per eliminare l'ascesa della coscienza delle macchine.
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Mercedes Leggett
- Agent Vasquez
- (as Mercedes Legett)
Recensioni in evidenza
Canadian movie production quality is equal to Canadian TV production quality which is a bit worse than US Lifetime movie quality.
Most parts were interesting, the twists and turns were good. Actors and actresses all did a decent job, there were some good looking scenes.
I would agree that the pacing felt off, it was 1.5 hours and felt like they were stretching things with filler that wasn't engaging.
Not nearly as good as the Detroit: Become Human game's story which has AI breaking away from their programming due to mis-treatment by humans, and being able to share that with other AI by touch.
So overall just okay.
Most parts were interesting, the twists and turns were good. Actors and actresses all did a decent job, there were some good looking scenes.
I would agree that the pacing felt off, it was 1.5 hours and felt like they were stretching things with filler that wasn't engaging.
Not nearly as good as the Detroit: Become Human game's story which has AI breaking away from their programming due to mis-treatment by humans, and being able to share that with other AI by touch.
So overall just okay.
I liked the movie and I believe it deserves a higher score of at least 6+.
There are a lot of movies being made today and a lot of them have flashy graphics and cool action, but they do miss any serious point fequently.
Well, the good thing about this one is that it has a point and a good one, it's interesting and even thought it has been raised before it still seems to entertain and entagle thoughts, as A. I. future is more close now than ever.
It's not a flashy blockbuster, it is quite slow paced, some character actions are questionable, dialogue is simple, some scenes seem quite cheaply made, yet I did enjoy this movie.
It has some style.
And I liked it's soul.
There are a lot of movies being made today and a lot of them have flashy graphics and cool action, but they do miss any serious point fequently.
Well, the good thing about this one is that it has a point and a good one, it's interesting and even thought it has been raised before it still seems to entertain and entagle thoughts, as A. I. future is more close now than ever.
It's not a flashy blockbuster, it is quite slow paced, some character actions are questionable, dialogue is simple, some scenes seem quite cheaply made, yet I did enjoy this movie.
It has some style.
And I liked it's soul.
The lack of suspense in the narrative and the predictable unfolding of events make for an unenjoyable movie. The filmmakers attempt to explore profound questions regarding the relationship between humans and machines. However, the execution lacks any sense of creativity or enthusiasm. In the movie, all Simulates must obey four precepts: 1) Do not inflict harm on any human being. 2) Do not modify yourself or any other Simulate. 3) Do not commit crimes against international or local law. 4) Obey all commands from your masters. As soon as these rules are read out in the film, you know that they will be broken. All is too predictable. Even the A. I. is not worked out properly. The script, though, indeed looks like something that could be generated by ChatGPT. Simulant is naïve nonsense that asks, "What does it mean to be human?" and answers the question by changing the code of simulates and recommending them a Dostoevsky book! Literally! Do not waste your time. Skip this one.
For a normally breezy 95 min runtime, this film felt endlessly long. It's terribly slow pacing was part of the problem, but mostly the issue here was the overall underwhelming filmmaking. From the story that's been done many times before and better that felt less intelligent and more artificial, to the directing that lacked any real urgency from scene to scene with annoying, predictable and repetitive sub-narratives. There was a lot of style, but very little substance to be an engaging viewing, even in its short runtime. I found myself constantly impatient for something more suspenseful and thrilling to happen, that never did. Even the all-star casting couldn't elevate the depressingly-toned slow story. Director April Mullen's lack of effective cast direction made it feel like all the actors were half asleep reading their lines. I will however say that the cinematography was excellent, the score very fitting, and the S/VFX quite passable, for a low budget B film.
Where do I begin. Well, for one thing, the acting and photography/coloring/effects is great. I don't always judge a movie by how it looks, but sometimes I do and I give this one extra points for looking very good. Every shot is spot-on and whoever was hired to do the job should get a raise. The sound quality was excellent and that person should also get a raise. This was of course made by HBO and they have enough money to to make a high quality film. That being said, the story is just not done right. I feel like whoever wrote the screenplay should have put more thought into it. Then again, I know how difficult it can be to be a writer and create a screenplay that a director can use to make a successful movie. I think it was an OK movie. Not something I would want to watch again. Someone else might like it.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe four precepts mentioned at the start of the movie are a homage to Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics. 1: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2: A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3: A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
- BlooperWhen Esmé is reset to factory default at 1hr 10 minutes her right arm alternates between being on her right and on her chest.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Celebrity Family Feud: Simu Liu vs. Nathan Chen and Monica vs. So So Def (2022)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Simulant?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 237.109 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti