Cakealikes

I think everyone who wrote reviews previously is missing the whole concept of this show. It is not meant to be as serious as some of the other shows, it is supposed to be funny and over the top. The bakers are laughing right along with the judges and everyone seems to be having fun. They know 14 hours isnt enough time to show what they can really do. Lighten up people, it's a TV show, entertainment is kind of the whole point. Oh, and Natalie Sideserf is the "judge who seems to know about cake." Internationally acclaimed and her cakes start at $500, she is kind of huge in the cake world. Funny how you all say you are serious about baking but dont know who she is...

I normally love cooking/cake competitions, but... This is really bad. The judges are not interesting or funny. The cakes look like something someone would make in a introduction to cake decorating class. Sorry, but this is a pass.

The premise had promise and the one judge who knows something about cake is OK. The other two judges "ad lib", try to be funny, repeat each other's comments incessantly, and have nothing "cakey" to say.

The woman is especially bad. She's not funny and her comments are irrelevant. Scrap the judges, retool the show to make it a real competition, and don't feel obligated to hire internet one hit wonders.

I like Kalen online though.

Not sure about all of the judges yet. Although I laugh a whole lot I do not feel they are cake experts. The show has promise

I watch just every cake competition I can find. This is not a real competition. It's a mockery. The concept to make a life size person out of cake is a great idea and I was excited to watch the show. Natalie Sideserf gives some good advice and insight so I like her on the show. The other two are failing miserably at trying to be funny. Do they know anything about cake?

I really like the idea of this show, but am disappointed that it isn't a real cake competition. I am hoping they will change it up and make it a serious competition show.