VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,1/10
4746
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Greg Heffley è un ragazzo ambizioso con un'immaginazione attiva e grandi progetti per diventare ricco e famoso. Il problema è che prima deve sopravvivere alla scuola media.Greg Heffley è un ragazzo ambizioso con un'immaginazione attiva e grandi progetti per diventare ricco e famoso. Il problema è che prima deve sopravvivere alla scuola media.Greg Heffley è un ragazzo ambizioso con un'immaginazione attiva e grandi progetti per diventare ricco e famoso. Il problema è che prima deve sopravvivere alla scuola media.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Cyrus Arnold
- Teen Driver
- (voce)
Erica Cerra
- Susan
- (voce)
Christian Convery
- Fregley
- (voce)
Hunter Dillon
- Rodrick
- (voce)
Yuvraj Kalsi
- Charlie Davies
- (voce)
- (as Yuvraj Singh Kalsi)
Billy Lopez
- Mr. Underwood
- (voce)
Donny Lucas
- Mr. Humphreys
- (voce)
Veda Maharaj
- Chirag Gupta
- (voce)
Robert Moloney
- Joshie
- (voce)
Gig Morton
- Random Boy
- (voce)
Recensioni in evidenza
I don't know what to think about it. It's animation is weird at times, there are some audio goofs, but overall, it's more of a watch-one-time-and-forget-about- it-only-to-remember-it-and-re-watch-it movie.
It's just so difficult to review or rate a new Diary of a Wimpy Kid movie without comparing it to the original three. The concept was cool, but it really failed to deliver a consistent story.
Overall 5/10.
Overall 5/10.
Well...it's better than The Long Haul? Cause, you know...that's so hard to do...
I don't know, I guess it's possible I'm being blinded by my nostalgia for the original trilogy and I would have been happy if those original actors never aged and they could have kept adapting this whole book series, but I think it's equally possible that what I'm really being blinded by is this uuuuuuugly animation.
I don't know if I'd consider this series to be something that would work better in live action or not, but I do know that if you took the drawings of an 11 year old and transcribed them into a 3D setting, you'd get...well, this. And if you think about that concept while pretending this film never existed, does it sound like a good idea? Because this film does exist, and pretty clearly, it wasn't a good idea. Why couldn't it have just been animated in exactly the same way as the book's illustrations, just with some colour added? I can't imagine how much more appealing that would have looked.
Even if you can ignore the *shudder* character designs, the whole thing looks so cheap. Sometimes, on my university campus, they show the animation students' work on a big screen on one of the buildings. The animation students who obviously don't exactly have a huge budget, and this really doesn't look too far from what they can do. The models all look untextured, the lip-syncing is pretty bad, and it all feels so flat. Ironic that it being 2D would have worked so much better.
And I'm just now learning that this was Jeff Kinney's idea. Just like how he actually wrote the script for The Long Haul. Why do you hate your own creation, Jeff? Are you just sick of the whole thing? Am I lucky that I stopped reading the books around 2014, and if I continued, I would have been met with crap like this?
Because the animation certainly isn't the only thing wrong with this. The voice acting is dull and forgettable, it's not very well directed, the story is pretty boring, at least when it's presented like this, and I chuckled maybe...three times?
Granted, that's three times as much as The Long Haul, and I will at least applaud the fact that this film really did keep a laser focus on Greg and Rowley's friendship and is at least very short so I didn't suffer for too long, and I actually did quite like the changes they made to the Halloween sequence, but for all that...curse you entropy, why can't you just leave those original actors alone and let them make more of those films?
It occurred to me while watching this just how much that original cast really made those films as special as they are to me, because you take them out, and suddenly you have this. You take them out, and I'm not gonna like it.
I don't know, I guess it's possible I'm being blinded by my nostalgia for the original trilogy and I would have been happy if those original actors never aged and they could have kept adapting this whole book series, but I think it's equally possible that what I'm really being blinded by is this uuuuuuugly animation.
I don't know if I'd consider this series to be something that would work better in live action or not, but I do know that if you took the drawings of an 11 year old and transcribed them into a 3D setting, you'd get...well, this. And if you think about that concept while pretending this film never existed, does it sound like a good idea? Because this film does exist, and pretty clearly, it wasn't a good idea. Why couldn't it have just been animated in exactly the same way as the book's illustrations, just with some colour added? I can't imagine how much more appealing that would have looked.
Even if you can ignore the *shudder* character designs, the whole thing looks so cheap. Sometimes, on my university campus, they show the animation students' work on a big screen on one of the buildings. The animation students who obviously don't exactly have a huge budget, and this really doesn't look too far from what they can do. The models all look untextured, the lip-syncing is pretty bad, and it all feels so flat. Ironic that it being 2D would have worked so much better.
And I'm just now learning that this was Jeff Kinney's idea. Just like how he actually wrote the script for The Long Haul. Why do you hate your own creation, Jeff? Are you just sick of the whole thing? Am I lucky that I stopped reading the books around 2014, and if I continued, I would have been met with crap like this?
Because the animation certainly isn't the only thing wrong with this. The voice acting is dull and forgettable, it's not very well directed, the story is pretty boring, at least when it's presented like this, and I chuckled maybe...three times?
Granted, that's three times as much as The Long Haul, and I will at least applaud the fact that this film really did keep a laser focus on Greg and Rowley's friendship and is at least very short so I didn't suffer for too long, and I actually did quite like the changes they made to the Halloween sequence, but for all that...curse you entropy, why can't you just leave those original actors alone and let them make more of those films?
It occurred to me while watching this just how much that original cast really made those films as special as they are to me, because you take them out, and suddenly you have this. You take them out, and I'm not gonna like it.
Here are the main points I would like to make about this movie
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
- This movie follows the book very well. Everything happens in the same order, which I find to be nice. I do think that this movie follows the storyline of the book better than the live action films.
- It is very nice to see Greg and his world in a fresh animation (manny is literally cursed.. the other characters are fine)
Cons:
- The voice acting throughout this movie isn't very "high-quality" Sometimes the characters' voices don't really capture the emotion as much as I would expect, and sometimes Susan Heffley sounds like her audio was recorded in a car..
- While the fresh animation style is nice, it seems unfinished. This movie seems to be experimental, like the animation isn't finished yet.
Only thought there were a few funny parts, most notable sequence was Fregley's house. They cut out really important parts from the book, (including the saftey patrol), plus only 2 minutes of Rodrick? They also made Greg likeable, which is not something you should do. Go watch the live action, this is very boring and mostly unfunny.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizCreator Jeff Kinney originally announced a Diary of a Wimpy Kid animated series. For unknown reasons, it was changed into a new animated movie.
- BlooperErica Cerra's (Susan Heffley's) microphone frequently rubs against something as she performs her voice lines, creating a rough static sound over many of her speaking scenes.
- Curiosità sui creditiDespite being co-produced by 20th Century Studios, there is no 20th Century Studios logo in the opening or closing credits, Only the Walt Disney Pictures logo in the opening film instead of the 20th Century Studios logo. Although, the 20th Century Studios logo was uncredited.
- ConnessioniFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: The Rat of All My Dreams (2020)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Diary of a Wimpy Kid?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 59min
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 16:9
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti