The Breach

If you watch a lot of movies influenced by the stories of William Hope Hodgson, H. P. Lovecraft and August Derleth, you might rate this a point or two higher because on some weird level you enjoy having your hopes dashed. For anyone else, this score might even be too generous.

It's a real shame, because the early setup of the film is great. It makes you think you're actually going to get a good Lovecraft-esque film (there's the ol' masochism again!). The opening titles are stylish. The actor who plays Connie has immediate charisma (sadly, she is underused). There's an intriguing early discovery which legitimately leads on to the next stage of the story. Sure, it's a tiny bit shaky, a little bit goofy, but that's par for the course in indie movies of the type; overall it looks like it's shaping up to be one of the good ones in the cosmic horror genre. You'll even see an actor who might recognise if you're a glutton for punishment: her from The Strain, yes (along with Connie's actor, the best performances here).

But there's a point where the wobbles suddenly escalate and soon after that the project completely falls on its arse. Any enthusiasm I had for the film ebbed away to nothing. It's as if an evil film crew came through the veil and replaced the original crew, wickedly sabotaging and unpicking all the good work that went before. Even Slash's soundtrack, which is never good, gets noticeably worse throughout.

I had never heard about this 2022 movie titled "The Breach" from writers Nick Cutter and Ian Weir prior to sitting down to watch it. But I have to admit that I was initially drawn in by the movie's cover right away when I stumbled upon it by random chance here in 2024. Suffice it to say, that with it being a horror movie that I hadn't already seen and an interesting cover, of course I opted to sit down and watch what director Rodrigo Gudiño had to offer.

The storyline in "The Breach" had potential, I will say that much. However, writers Nick Cutter and Ian Weir just never really tapped fully into the potential readily available within the concept of the story. A shame really, because "The Breach" could have been so much more than what director Rodrigo Gudiño managed to deliver.

I was not familiar with any of the cast members in the movie. And that is something that I actually do enjoy when I sit down to watch a movie. And I will say that the cast ensemble in "The Breach" were good, and the actors and actresses put on good performances throughout the course of the movie.

Now, something that I really enjoyed about "The Breach" were the special effects. There were some nice special effects in the movie, and that definitely helped to make up for an otherwise bland script and storyline.

While I did manage to sit through the entire movie, I can honestly say that it is not a movie that I will ever return to watch a second time. It just simply was a bit too mundane, bland and without much of anything thrilling or scary for the audience to enjoy.

My rating of "The Breach" lands on a generous four out of ten stars.

I'll start by admitting that I watched this because I saw Alex Lifeson in the cast and did a double-take. Unfortunately his scenes seemed to be shot from his own webcam in his studio with his amplifiers in the background lol. But hey, he got me to watch it!

The movie is a sci-fi/horror mystery that doesn't really explain anything and ends up being more confusing than interesting. Even though you can predict where things are going, you have no idea why. The story felt largely inspired by "From Beyond", but this movie fell short in every way. The overall production was about on the level of a moderately budgeted SyFy original movie from 2005. None of the actors stood out as being particularly effective in their roles. I saw that Slash did the music and was listed as an executive producer, and then there was a scene at the end with "Are You Afraid of the Dark?" style music that made me laugh out loud.

The biggest positives I can give are to the editing, some of the prop design, and there was some effective cinematography. And even though I wasn't enjoying the movie, the director knew how to keep me engaged and the movie was decently paced.

4/10 - I'd recommend this to someone who has fun watching bad movies, it's not painful to get through.

Pretty good reworking of the Lovecraft tale that was used as the basis for the far better film From Beyond made in 1986. I've read a novel by Nick Cutter, who was the writer/adapter of this screenplay, and enjoyed it enough to give this film a chance.

The acting from the entire cast is decent, and it is nice to see a lot of practical effects used in lieu of CGI. While the final third is exciting, it leaves too many unanswered questions, although it does have a nasty final sting for the viewer.

I'd say it's worth 90 minutes of your time if you don't mind a slow buildup to the third act. I was never bored with it.

There are some interesting ideas here, to be sure. Unfortunately, it feels like it borrows heavily from numerous different sources, fails to deliver a coherent storyline, well defined characters, good pacing, or a satisfying conclusion. Apparently, this is the directorial debut of one of the head honchos at Rue Morgue magazine. I can cut a little slack for lack of technical experience; not so much for failures of execution in areas that really shouldn't have been that hard to fine tune. It does feature some excellent creature effects toward the end; it just doesn't really explain why the creatures are there or why they appear when they do. All in all, not horrible, but not really worth watching either, IMO. Maybe this direcor will do better next time.