Segue esperti subacquei d'altura mentre combattono contro la furia degli elementi per salvare il loro compagno di equipaggio intrappolato a centinaia di piedi sotto la superficie dell'oceano... Leggi tuttoSegue esperti subacquei d'altura mentre combattono contro la furia degli elementi per salvare il loro compagno di equipaggio intrappolato a centinaia di piedi sotto la superficie dell'oceano.Segue esperti subacquei d'altura mentre combattono contro la furia degli elementi per salvare il loro compagno di equipaggio intrappolato a centinaia di piedi sotto la superficie dell'oceano.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria in totale
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Last Breath' is a gripping survival thriller with intense atmosphere, strong performances, and realistic deep-sea diving depiction. Themes of heroism, perilous work, and emotional rescue tension are highlighted. Criticisms include pacing issues, lack of character development, and comparisons to a previous documentary. Some find it lacks emotional depth and creative storytelling. Despite this, many praise technical aspects like cinematography and sound design, deeming it an engaging, albeit predictable, thriller.
Recensioni in evidenza
This film was fine but just could have been much more compelling.
Obviously the true story being told is incredible and very tense. But the way the film tells the story is just lacking.
The pacing is really odd and the script and acting feels like it's a B movie. The actors are wooden and they seem to have as much urgency and haste as a slug.
The cgi of the ship in the storm is good, and there are some good underwater shots.
It was also interesting to learn that they used some real footage of the real Chris as he was stranded.
I felt the addition of the fiancee just felt clichéd and shoehorned in to try and add more drama.
It's a watchable film but could have been better.
Obviously the true story being told is incredible and very tense. But the way the film tells the story is just lacking.
The pacing is really odd and the script and acting feels like it's a B movie. The actors are wooden and they seem to have as much urgency and haste as a slug.
The cgi of the ship in the storm is good, and there are some good underwater shots.
It was also interesting to learn that they used some real footage of the real Chris as he was stranded.
I felt the addition of the fiancee just felt clichéd and shoehorned in to try and add more drama.
It's a watchable film but could have been better.
What is supposed to be a routine repair in the North Sea off the shore of Scotland turns into a race against time and a life-or-death situation for a trio of deep-sea divers.
This movie is based on a miraculous true story. The story is one of resilience, teamwork, and bravery. It is told in a way that gives the viewer an idea of the profession and the part everyone plays. The visuals are outstanding, showing the awe-inspiring depth of the ocean and the risk deep-sea divers take regularly. With a runtime of one hour and thirty-three minutes, this movie will have the viewer on the edge of their seat, holding their breath from the beginning to the end. This movie is worth a trip to the theater to appreciate this incredible story.
This movie is based on a miraculous true story. The story is one of resilience, teamwork, and bravery. It is told in a way that gives the viewer an idea of the profession and the part everyone plays. The visuals are outstanding, showing the awe-inspiring depth of the ocean and the risk deep-sea divers take regularly. With a runtime of one hour and thirty-three minutes, this movie will have the viewer on the edge of their seat, holding their breath from the beginning to the end. This movie is worth a trip to the theater to appreciate this incredible story.
What an amazing true story! I was blown away by the facts of what happened. Everything about it was absolutely terrifying, and the fact that almost nothing came from this afterwords is nothing short of a miracle. I never knew something like this was even possible until I looked up the possibility. The movie itself was done well, with a good amount of laughs and emotions being captured for what it is. Easy to connect and it brought you into a vision of what it was like. I would like to read more into the story and what facts they didnt include into the movie. Overall great movie and I suggest watching.
Watched at AMC on 3-4-2025.
Watched at AMC on 3-4-2025.
A couple of divers go into the North Sea to carry out essential maintenance on the pipelines, they hit a snag and one of the team, Chris Lemons, breaks away, getting lost in the depths, a desperate mission to bring him back begins.
I'll start by saying, I did enjoy it, and after some of the atrocious films I've seen on the big screen recently, it did at least hold my attention. For me it looks and feels like a made for TV movie, the appeal was seeing Woody Harrelson.
In this day and age, with energy bills sky high, people are a lot more aware of underwater structures, such as pipes and energy lines, so it definitely has a relevance.
I have a massive phobia about open water, plus an appreciation for how much claustrophobia can really affect some people, this film has elements of both. It does pack in some tension and at times it leaves you feeling quite literally breathless.
I didn't feel particularly engaged with the characters on an emotional level, but that's the story I guess, they chose not to give them lengthy introductions.
Some of the camera work was good, best of all, the lighting, they got it spot on, it's suitably dark and gloomy, they never went overboard with the lights, smart choice.
It's worth taking another look at the documentary, it's still an incredible story of survival, it's a tremendous watch.
The acting was a mixed bag, I thought Mark Bonnar came across well, Harrelson was ok, I found Simu Liu a little wooden, I know he was playing the aloof, serious guy, but he just felt blank.
Overall it's a solid movie, I just feel that they didn't make the most out of a truly compelling and powerful story. I fear it'll be forgotten fairly quickly.
6/10.
I'll start by saying, I did enjoy it, and after some of the atrocious films I've seen on the big screen recently, it did at least hold my attention. For me it looks and feels like a made for TV movie, the appeal was seeing Woody Harrelson.
In this day and age, with energy bills sky high, people are a lot more aware of underwater structures, such as pipes and energy lines, so it definitely has a relevance.
I have a massive phobia about open water, plus an appreciation for how much claustrophobia can really affect some people, this film has elements of both. It does pack in some tension and at times it leaves you feeling quite literally breathless.
I didn't feel particularly engaged with the characters on an emotional level, but that's the story I guess, they chose not to give them lengthy introductions.
Some of the camera work was good, best of all, the lighting, they got it spot on, it's suitably dark and gloomy, they never went overboard with the lights, smart choice.
It's worth taking another look at the documentary, it's still an incredible story of survival, it's a tremendous watch.
The acting was a mixed bag, I thought Mark Bonnar came across well, Harrelson was ok, I found Simu Liu a little wooden, I know he was playing the aloof, serious guy, but he just felt blank.
Overall it's a solid movie, I just feel that they didn't make the most out of a truly compelling and powerful story. I fear it'll be forgotten fairly quickly.
6/10.
While I keep hearing that the 2019 documentary (co-directed by Alex Parkinson, who also directs this) tackled the story a lot better, I like to think what works for and against the film is its 90-minute runtime. A story of this kind needs greater character establishment scenes and dialogue to make us really care for the lead(s) in underwater peril. That unfortunately isn't the case here as we dive into the core incident almost straight away, with time ticking fast. On the flip side, it maintains the thrill quotient all through by keeping things eventful and busy. The central performances (Woody Harrelson, Simu Liu, Finn Cole, and Cliff Curtis) are quite solid, plus the production design and visual effects are neatly done. The real-life footage at the end indicates the camaraderie between the men, which also made me want to see more of the documentary. It also made me think about the dangerous jobs that humans often sign up for.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThere is no such thing as a start up CPU on a Dynamic Positioning system and no amount of "repatching" is going to fix things. A power cycling of the DP controllers was the best course of action as was performed by the crew in the real life scenario. The master of the vessel also took manual control of the thrusters almost immediately after the vessel started to drift.
- BlooperThe characters in the pressure chambers speak normally despite breathing helium, which should make their voices high-pitched. This is likely a creative choice for clarity and drama, possibly justified in the film by voice-normalizing tech, as actor Finn Cole hinted in a Mochi Magazine article (Feb 28, 2025). Online discussions, like a Reddit thread (Dec 12, 2024), note the contrast with the real helium voices in the 2019 documentary, suggesting the filmmakers prioritized storytelling over strict realism.
- Citazioni
Duncan Allock: Back in the day, though, you know, when I was starting out, you only needed two things: little common sense and a good bottle of Scotch.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Film Threat: VERSUS: OSCARS 2025 HANGOVER! | Film Threat Versus (2025)
- Colonne sonoreGo Be Free
Written by Liz Horsman and Gabrielle Aplin
Published by Peermusic (UK) Ltd and Youthemic Ltd
Performed by Gabrielle Aplin
Produced by Liz Horsman
Mixed by Mike Spencer
Courtesy of Never Fade Records
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Everything New on Prime Video in August
Everything New on Prime Video in August
Your guide to all the new movies and shows streaming on Prime Video in the US this month.
- How long is Last Breath?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Sin oxígeno
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Scozia, Regno Unito(Aberdeen, Scotland, UK)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 24.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 21.051.180 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 7.851.190 USD
- 2 mar 2025
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 24.410.040 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 33min(93 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti