Quando il miliardario tecnologico Slater King incontra la cameriera Frida durante il suo gala di raccolta fondi, la invita a unirsi a lui e ai suoi amici in una vacanza da sogno sulla sua is... Leggi tuttoQuando il miliardario tecnologico Slater King incontra la cameriera Frida durante il suo gala di raccolta fondi, la invita a unirsi a lui e ai suoi amici in una vacanza da sogno sulla sua isola privata. Là, la realtà sembra storta.Quando il miliardario tecnologico Slater King incontra la cameriera Frida durante il suo gala di raccolta fondi, la invita a unirsi a lui e ai suoi amici in una vacanza da sogno sulla sua isola privata. Là, la realtà sembra storta.
- Premi
- 5 vittorie e 22 candidature totali
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Blink Twice' delves into power, manipulation, and female empowerment, reminiscent of 'Get Out' and 'Glass Onion'. The film's sinister island retreat narrative critiques wealth and privilege. Psychological tension and dark humor are highlighted, with praise for Naomi Ackie and Channing Tatum's performances. The ending is divisive, with mixed opinions on its satisfaction. Zoë Kravitz's direction and cinematography are lauded, though script and character development receive criticism. Overall, 'Blink Twice' is an ambitious film with a compelling premise and mixed execution.
Recensioni in evidenza
This is mainly due to:
Adria Arjona is the secret star of the movie - in my opinion. She looks stunning and plays the funniest scenes in the movie.
Basically, there are some "Saltburn" vibes (the rich invite the normal people to a non-stop party time, separated from the rest of the world) and some "Get Out" vibes. (Something seems wrong here).
The soundtrack is also really nice.
An absolutely brilliant choice of music, mainly soul/funk/Disco. Rufus with Chaka Khan, James Brown, and more.
And the movie is funny. It's almost a comedy, even though it's actually a brutal mystery thriller.
I recommend checking out this little gem. Don't listen to the extremely negative reviews. Haters gonna hate.
- the very good actors, who are
Adria Arjona is the secret star of the movie - in my opinion. She looks stunning and plays the funniest scenes in the movie.
- and the story, which keeps you interested in how all of this is going to play out.
Basically, there are some "Saltburn" vibes (the rich invite the normal people to a non-stop party time, separated from the rest of the world) and some "Get Out" vibes. (Something seems wrong here).
The soundtrack is also really nice.
An absolutely brilliant choice of music, mainly soul/funk/Disco. Rufus with Chaka Khan, James Brown, and more.
And the movie is funny. It's almost a comedy, even though it's actually a brutal mystery thriller.
I recommend checking out this little gem. Don't listen to the extremely negative reviews. Haters gonna hate.
The end really didn't do it for me.
I really was engaged with this movie for 95% of the ride and then the last couple of moments felt like.... A different story and point entirely.
I am still thinking about it and trying to reconcile in my mind why did they end it that way? It does not seem like the intention or maybe the general message of the rest of the film.
Is the ending supposed to be a statement of society, or a fantasy that we were supposed to be excited about? I don't know. It seemed contrived and trying to be edgy and I just wish something more practical happened with our main characters.
That ending wasn't justice. And it wasn't empowering. It was unsettling.
Reguardles, this film may make you really feel some intense emotions, as you figure out what is going on and I think they executed that very well. Everyone in this acted in a way that really impressed me and showed a lot of intent with just their body language in many scenes. I felt a lot more than I heard, and that was a very immersive experience.
I would have given this movie a 9, if it weren't for that ending. And I hope there one day is some other cut released that has almost anything else happening to these 2 main characters. It seems so out of place and fast, it makes you think it was merely an interchangeable afterthought, to what was a really interesting story and plot (during the majority of the movie) .
I really was engaged with this movie for 95% of the ride and then the last couple of moments felt like.... A different story and point entirely.
I am still thinking about it and trying to reconcile in my mind why did they end it that way? It does not seem like the intention or maybe the general message of the rest of the film.
Is the ending supposed to be a statement of society, or a fantasy that we were supposed to be excited about? I don't know. It seemed contrived and trying to be edgy and I just wish something more practical happened with our main characters.
That ending wasn't justice. And it wasn't empowering. It was unsettling.
Reguardles, this film may make you really feel some intense emotions, as you figure out what is going on and I think they executed that very well. Everyone in this acted in a way that really impressed me and showed a lot of intent with just their body language in many scenes. I felt a lot more than I heard, and that was a very immersive experience.
I would have given this movie a 9, if it weren't for that ending. And I hope there one day is some other cut released that has almost anything else happening to these 2 main characters. It seems so out of place and fast, it makes you think it was merely an interchangeable afterthought, to what was a really interesting story and plot (during the majority of the movie) .
A waitress meets a rich elitist while being clumsy and making mistakes who then takes her and her friends to a secluded island with other people, all is good for a short time until it isn't without spoiling what happens. Zoë Kravitz wrote and directed this so probably knows all about this stuff being a child of the industry. They even make a joke about human sacrifices, which I found very interesting.
Is it well directed? I'd say yes for Zoe's first film but the characters in these movies when there is a group of people and their interactions are kinda boring and generic, what you have seen a million times before until initially two characters get on the same wavelength with what's going on and all hell breaks loose.
Not sure what else I can say without spoiling the film, all is well acted and shot.
Is it well directed? I'd say yes for Zoe's first film but the characters in these movies when there is a group of people and their interactions are kinda boring and generic, what you have seen a million times before until initially two characters get on the same wavelength with what's going on and all hell breaks loose.
Not sure what else I can say without spoiling the film, all is well acted and shot.
6sme3
The impressive parts of BLINK TWICE do not add up to a satisfying whole. This is a visually appealing film filled with solid performances by accomplished actors. It also is a weird film devoid of thrills, tension, frights, or emotions. Though the performances are good, the characters are undefined. Without improving on them, the script cribs from GLASS ONION, THE MENU, and other limited location thrillers.
When tech billionaire Slater King (Channing Tatum) meets cocktail waitress Frida (Naomi Ackie) at his fundraising gala, sparks fly. He invites her to join him and his friends on a dream vacation on his private island. It's paradise. Wild nights blend into sun-soaked days and everyone's having a great time. Nobody wants this trip to end, but as strange things start to happen, Frida begins to question her reality. Something is wrong with this place. She'll have to uncover the truth if she wants to make it out of this party alive.
When tech billionaire Slater King (Channing Tatum) meets cocktail waitress Frida (Naomi Ackie) at his fundraising gala, sparks fly. He invites her to join him and his friends on a dream vacation on his private island. It's paradise. Wild nights blend into sun-soaked days and everyone's having a great time. Nobody wants this trip to end, but as strange things start to happen, Frida begins to question her reality. Something is wrong with this place. She'll have to uncover the truth if she wants to make it out of this party alive.
First off, for a first time director, Zoe Kravitz has done very well. The film keeps everything interesting and goes along at a good pace.
Channing Tatum (being on the poster) is the draw for the audience. Especially, one that without him may not ultimately get a look in. He does a very competent job.
The sexual violence - there is a disclaimer at the start. That disclaimer, from what I saw in another review, is apparently a hint at what you should expect and the reviewer seemed disappointed that the sexual violence wasn't more graphic.
To address the issue, I personally didn't need to see that. For a few reasons, primarily this is NOT a film locking your head in position to confront you with the ugly reality of how sexual violence is perpetrated. We can gather that it's not good. We know.
What this film is primarily about psychological thriller. And we have seen films (not necessary addressing the issue at hand) like this across the decades. Pacey thrillers where you want the goody to outwit the evil baddy. And to that end, this does a very good job. It reveals the plot at a reasonable pace.
I don't want to spoilt the plot so I haven't talked about it. The trailer tells you what you need but ideally go into this not knowing anything.
You may even figure out the ending but even then it produces a twist to it all (albeit one that may counter the issues at hand).
This a metaphor for societies' ills with men who abuse women. And as such, we know in real life the awful things that happen. This film is simply packaging that as a thriller and providing a possible way to mitigate these ills even if the final turn is a little...imo....problematic.
You will enjoy this if you after a good night in and looking for a pacey thriller.
It is a lot better than some other thrillers I have seen recently.
If you're after extreme violence and horror, I suspect you will be disappointed.
Think more "Get Out" than say "Irreversible". Both great films, just different levels of violence.
Anyway, personally, I enjoyed it and it wasn't too overlong.
Channing Tatum (being on the poster) is the draw for the audience. Especially, one that without him may not ultimately get a look in. He does a very competent job.
The sexual violence - there is a disclaimer at the start. That disclaimer, from what I saw in another review, is apparently a hint at what you should expect and the reviewer seemed disappointed that the sexual violence wasn't more graphic.
To address the issue, I personally didn't need to see that. For a few reasons, primarily this is NOT a film locking your head in position to confront you with the ugly reality of how sexual violence is perpetrated. We can gather that it's not good. We know.
What this film is primarily about psychological thriller. And we have seen films (not necessary addressing the issue at hand) like this across the decades. Pacey thrillers where you want the goody to outwit the evil baddy. And to that end, this does a very good job. It reveals the plot at a reasonable pace.
I don't want to spoilt the plot so I haven't talked about it. The trailer tells you what you need but ideally go into this not knowing anything.
You may even figure out the ending but even then it produces a twist to it all (albeit one that may counter the issues at hand).
This a metaphor for societies' ills with men who abuse women. And as such, we know in real life the awful things that happen. This film is simply packaging that as a thriller and providing a possible way to mitigate these ills even if the final turn is a little...imo....problematic.
You will enjoy this if you after a good night in and looking for a pacey thriller.
It is a lot better than some other thrillers I have seen recently.
If you're after extreme violence and horror, I suspect you will be disappointed.
Think more "Get Out" than say "Irreversible". Both great films, just different levels of violence.
Anyway, personally, I enjoyed it and it wasn't too overlong.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizZoë Kravitz started writing Blink Twice under the original working title Pussy Island in 2017. Kravitz intended on keeping this title for the film but a negative reception from the MPAA, women, and theaters led to her change it.
- BlooperBoa constrictors aren't venomous so they couldn't have made snake venom liquor from it. The snake was actually a venomous viper.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Late Night with Seth Meyers: Channing Tatum/Sabrina Ionescu (2024)
- Colonne sonorePaid the Cost to Be Boss (The Boss)
Written by Charles Bobbitt, James Brown & Fred Wesley
Performed by James Brown
Courtesy of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Music Inc.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Blink Twice?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Parpadea Dos Veces
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Yucatán, Messico(Location)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 20.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 23.093.906 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 7.301.894 USD
- 25 ago 2024
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 48.093.906 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 42min(102 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti