Mad God

Mad God is one of the most visually and audibly arresting films I have ever seen. To say that the technical craft on display is striking would be a criminal understatement. This is thoroughly the singular vision of a master artist, and I am so glad I got to experience it.

It is chock full of metaphorical depth related to man's relationship to both creation and destruction, and for those who are patient and are in love with the macabre, there will be so much for you to glean from it.

As for myself, I did glean a bit from the film's heavy messages, though the extremely sparse narrative left me wanting a LOT more.

We never stay with a character for longer than 20 minutes, and our journeys with them are always cut short right as they're getting interesting. The lack of any clear stakes, motivations, or goals makes it extremely hard to get invested in, and makes 83 minutes feel like two hours.

It's clear that Phil Tippett used the 30 years of production to really get his visual ideas to be made manifest in gorgeous glory, but I do so wish that he had spent more of that time writing instead.

No doubt a visual spectacle and impressive stop-motion affair from Phil Tippett, but Mad God has essentially zero plot or reason to care for anything that's going on. Some unknown guy wanders around a machinery place seeing weird stuff, and that's pretty much it. There's no dialogue at all. If visual mindscrew-ery stuff and style over substance is your cup of tea, then you might love it. As for me, I needed more than that.

5/10.

Wow, work on this one began in 1987 and took over thirty years to complete! That alone marks this bit of stop-motion as a film worth considering. But is it worth viewing otherwise? I would have to say yes, but be under no illusions, this is not a film for everyone! There is no dialogue, so events onscreen are propelled by imagery and sound alone and its not honestly always easy to keep up with what is happening and why. On top of that, much of the imagery and events are of the grotesque variety, so viewers of a more sensitive bent should be warned. So, taking this into account, this tale of events in a post-apocalyptic fantasy world should best be approached by those with a taste for the bizarre and unpleasant. The imagery is extremely impressive, very often and this is one of those rare films which truly feels like an instant cult movie. Left-field animation fans should have a field day.

Well for once my wife and I are not agreeing about a movie. She gave it a four, I gave it a seven but since I write the reviews a seven it is. More than thirty years of work to create this mostly bizarre stop-motion movie. You gotta give it to Phil Tippett, he created something unique with a lot of patience. If I had to guess what Tippett likes to read I would say HP Lovecraft. If I had to guess what artist Tippett admires I would say HR Giger. If I had to guess what kind of music Tippett enjoyed listening to I would say Pink Floyd, especially The Wall. If I had to guess what kind of drugs Tippett takes, I would say I don't know but I want some. Mad Dog is weird, it's gross and grotesque, a combination of bio-mechanical and steampunk, it's apocalyptic and something you need to watch under influence especially if you like any of the things written above.

Written & directed by Phil Tippett, a veteran movie special effects guy who's worked on franchises such as "Star Wars" and "Jurassic Park", this is a walk on a *truly* wild side. It's a stop-motion animated odyssey into a bizarre and freaky netherworld, as a character called "The Assassin" descends into the depths of Hell, clearly with an agenda in mind, as they work from a rapidly deteriorating map.

Even on his worst nights, Tim Burton probably didn't have nightmares quite like *this*. I'll say right now that this visually oriented picture is *not* for all tastes. Some people may feel that the "story" (such as it is) lets them down, with not much to engage them other than the grotesqueries on display. It's definitely an animation film for adults - it's dark, twisted, and very violent at times. It also tells this "story" through a succession of images rather than a conventional narrative. The viewers will notice that there's no real dialogue (as we understand it) to speak of.

This magnum opus for Tippett was *many* years in the making - he began it in 1987, and finally finished it in 2020. While I personally wouldn't call it a great film, it's so *interesting* and *provocative* to look at that it did hold my attention. That said, it's good that this has a relatively brief run time of just over 84 minutes.

I enjoyed it, and would recommend it to people looking for something way out of the ordinary.

Seven out of 10.