VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,9/10
1953
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Kathryn, un'attrice in difficoltà e casalinga insoddisfatta, viene coinvolta con il suo nuovo giardiniere, Ben. Mentre lui le dà l'attenzione e la sensibilità che brama, iniziano a innamorar... Leggi tuttoKathryn, un'attrice in difficoltà e casalinga insoddisfatta, viene coinvolta con il suo nuovo giardiniere, Ben. Mentre lui le dà l'attenzione e la sensibilità che brama, iniziano a innamorarsi, ma Ben non è quello che sembra.Kathryn, un'attrice in difficoltà e casalinga insoddisfatta, viene coinvolta con il suo nuovo giardiniere, Ben. Mentre lui le dà l'attenzione e la sensibilità che brama, iniziano a innamorarsi, ma Ben non è quello che sembra.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Recensioni in evidenza
Writer and director Chadd Harbold sure butchered the 1960's classic film of the same name, by giving it a Lifetime/Hallmark feel. The usually very comfortable low 87 min runtime felt way longer with ridiculously slow pacing, and Harbold's screenplay being 80% filler and maybe 20% substance. It's a shame, because there was tons of potential that was missed, and in the hands of filmmakers that know what they're doing, this could've been great. Even if this was edited/cut down to a 20-30 min short film, I probably would've enjoyed it more. The ending was part cringe, part nonsense, and part ok, but all the previous filler was just boring and underwhelming. Even some of the fade-ins and outs in the thrill scenes towards the end were 1980's quality.
The cinematography was decent, although the darker scenes were way too dark. The score was your typical loud, unfitting and annoying B-grade fare, and in some of the quieter dialogue scenes, I couldn't make out any words because of the overbearing score, and that's something that could've been fixed in editing, if there actually was any.
Casting and performances were decent, and I can tell they tried their best considering there probably wasn't any cast direction from Harbold. Shiloh Fernandez whispering dialogue got annoying quickly, and incoherent when the score was overbearing his scenes. I'd pass on this, especially if you've seen the original, because comparing it to this one will be even more disappointing. A very generous 5/10 most towards the cast.
The cinematography was decent, although the darker scenes were way too dark. The score was your typical loud, unfitting and annoying B-grade fare, and in some of the quieter dialogue scenes, I couldn't make out any words because of the overbearing score, and that's something that could've been fixed in editing, if there actually was any.
Casting and performances were decent, and I can tell they tried their best considering there probably wasn't any cast direction from Harbold. Shiloh Fernandez whispering dialogue got annoying quickly, and incoherent when the score was overbearing his scenes. I'd pass on this, especially if you've seen the original, because comparing it to this one will be even more disappointing. A very generous 5/10 most towards the cast.
The film had some great visuals and an overall, style. I enjoyed the story structure. It felt very noir. Even Shiloh's performance was quite entertaining. He was both charming, yet creepy. His character's back story was also interesting. But the film could've dove in a bit more on his back story. Perhaps, I was just invested to know more of his motives.
The only issue I had was the lead (Ashley Benson). She was not convincing in her role; it felt very forced. In most of the films I've seen her in, she always came off exhausted. To me, she was just there - acting. The film should've cast a stronger leading lady. She should've taken acting lessons.
The only issue I had was the lead (Ashley Benson). She was not convincing in her role; it felt very forced. In most of the films I've seen her in, she always came off exhausted. To me, she was just there - acting. The film should've cast a stronger leading lady. She should've taken acting lessons.
I have seen my fair share of stinkers over the years, but this remake of private property is among the worst offenders.
Why do i think so?
For starters this is a remake, so it lacks originality, there is barely a plot recognizable, twists were so obvious, that they lacked any kind of surprise. There are some stunningly looking shots in the movie, but as any Zack Snyder film will show you, gorgeous looking shots do not rescue a movie without a plot. The main characters lack any form of chemistry.
I had the feeling, the director decided to make a film noir, but a very colorful one.
The list if producers and executive producers on this film is longer than the list of actors. Among them the leading man of this movie.
It might be worthwhile digging* up the original movie and give it a shot, but watching this one was a waste of money and time.
Why do i think so?
For starters this is a remake, so it lacks originality, there is barely a plot recognizable, twists were so obvious, that they lacked any kind of surprise. There are some stunningly looking shots in the movie, but as any Zack Snyder film will show you, gorgeous looking shots do not rescue a movie without a plot. The main characters lack any form of chemistry.
I had the feeling, the director decided to make a film noir, but a very colorful one.
The list if producers and executive producers on this film is longer than the list of actors. Among them the leading man of this movie.
It might be worthwhile digging* up the original movie and give it a shot, but watching this one was a waste of money and time.
I didn't realize this was a remake, so haven't seen the original (but I'd bet my bottom dollar it's superior to this piece of crap). I don't review many movies but I had to figure out what my password was just to log on to rate this one. I'm fairly easy to please as far as movies are concerned, but this was just bad. Bad plot, bad acting, bad writing. It felt like such a mess, it would not surprise me if I found out this was the final project for a high school film class. It was so laughably cringy and ridiculous that I just couldn't stop watching because I had to find out if it would end up having any redeeming value at all. Spoiler alert: it doesn't.
None have captured the spirit of how bad a film can be like this one. I literally couldn't NOt Watch because I am shocked this was made. 0/10 would never recommend not even to my worst enemy. Guantanomo Bay banned this movie because it was too evil to put on repeat.
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniRemake of Private Property (1960)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Private Property?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 22.149 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 27min(87 min)
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti