Segui un magnate immobiliare di Atlanta mentre affronta un'improvvisa bancarotta e cerca di difendere il suo impero da coloro che tentano di trarre vantaggio dalla sua caduta in disgrazia.Segui un magnate immobiliare di Atlanta mentre affronta un'improvvisa bancarotta e cerca di difendere il suo impero da coloro che tentano di trarre vantaggio dalla sua caduta in disgrazia.Segui un magnate immobiliare di Atlanta mentre affronta un'improvvisa bancarotta e cerca di difendere il suo impero da coloro che tentano di trarre vantaggio dalla sua caduta in disgrazia.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria in totale
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
The series builds up the story and characters pretty good. As tensions rise it's hard to know on which side you stand.
Acting by Jeff Daniels is superb.
And Tom Pelphery manages to make you see his POV and hate him at the same time.
I was just about to say what a great series it was, when the last episode ruined the whole series for me.
Not only was it 100% Deusex Machina but the last 10 minutes was a crude amateur-like attempt to surprise the watcher with an end twist.
It almost felt as if the last episode and specially the last 10 minutes of the series were written by a different person or team, one without experience.
Unlike excellent twists such as in The Usual Suspects or in Fight Club, this "twist" was so unlikely and ridiculous it not only fails to surprise but mocks the development.
I was so unimpressed and angered by the ending that the last 10 minutes de series went from a solid 9 to a 5. From a "you guys have to watch this!" to a "don't even bother".
Such a pity that the great acting and initial story was ruined by the last episode.
Acting by Jeff Daniels is superb.
And Tom Pelphery manages to make you see his POV and hate him at the same time.
I was just about to say what a great series it was, when the last episode ruined the whole series for me.
Not only was it 100% Deusex Machina but the last 10 minutes was a crude amateur-like attempt to surprise the watcher with an end twist.
It almost felt as if the last episode and specially the last 10 minutes of the series were written by a different person or team, one without experience.
Unlike excellent twists such as in The Usual Suspects or in Fight Club, this "twist" was so unlikely and ridiculous it not only fails to surprise but mocks the development.
I was so unimpressed and angered by the ending that the last 10 minutes de series went from a solid 9 to a 5. From a "you guys have to watch this!" to a "don't even bother".
Such a pity that the great acting and initial story was ruined by the last episode.
Not sure what this show is it's like a setup for the ending which is just dumb.
Everyone is good in this show the writing is ok directing ok the plot starts out interesting and it builds up and the climax is an anticlimax it's odd way to end the show thought .
The struggles of the rich and the not so rich and the people in between .
Racism and corruption and power and greed and jealousy and weak men and strong men .
The women they love and leave and the relationships they have now .
Robotic knees and loss of control getting old but wanting to remain strong and powerful .
How could any of this end well ? It doesn't ,
Everyone is good in this show the writing is ok directing ok the plot starts out interesting and it builds up and the climax is an anticlimax it's odd way to end the show thought .
The struggles of the rich and the not so rich and the people in between .
Racism and corruption and power and greed and jealousy and weak men and strong men .
The women they love and leave and the relationships they have now .
Robotic knees and loss of control getting old but wanting to remain strong and powerful .
How could any of this end well ? It doesn't ,
This is... not that good to be honest. The script is uneven and pretty flat, and if you've seen enough films in your day you will be able to predict a lot of what is going to happen.
Some events are pretty interesting, especially when the story ventures into the absurd, like the coupling of horses scenes or the infamous scene in the last episode, but other than that this feels pretty procedural.
The only thing that really hooked me was the prison storyline, that felt genuine and interesting all the way, and I always enjoy seeing Anthony Heald as well.
Jeff Daniels carries this show on his shoulders and he does his best, dominating the scenes he is in with his enormous presence and charisma. But it is clear for all to see that he is severely limited in his performance when the script is not up to it.
Some events are pretty interesting, especially when the story ventures into the absurd, like the coupling of horses scenes or the infamous scene in the last episode, but other than that this feels pretty procedural.
The only thing that really hooked me was the prison storyline, that felt genuine and interesting all the way, and I always enjoy seeing Anthony Heald as well.
Jeff Daniels carries this show on his shoulders and he does his best, dominating the scenes he is in with his enormous presence and charisma. But it is clear for all to see that he is severely limited in his performance when the script is not up to it.
Charlie Croker sits at the top of his business empire, but it's crumbling, debts are being called in, and the vultures circle. In a position of relative weakness, Charlie is played by those in power.
This series has gained notoriety, mainly for a flash in episode six, but there's been a lot of positive chat, and for the most part, it's a decent series.
Episodes one and two build up Charlie as this huge, divisive, charismatic figure, Jeff Daniels plays him perfectly, but as the series develops, the focus comes away from him, and the story meanders somewhat.
Conrad's story takes over, and comes out of nowhere, it really does detract from Charlie's story.
It's watchable enough, I had just hoped for so much more, without the powerhouse performance form Jeff Daniels, I think it would have fallen flat.
Perhaps I should have read the book.
6/10.
This series has gained notoriety, mainly for a flash in episode six, but there's been a lot of positive chat, and for the most part, it's a decent series.
Episodes one and two build up Charlie as this huge, divisive, charismatic figure, Jeff Daniels plays him perfectly, but as the series develops, the focus comes away from him, and the story meanders somewhat.
Conrad's story takes over, and comes out of nowhere, it really does detract from Charlie's story.
It's watchable enough, I had just hoped for so much more, without the powerhouse performance form Jeff Daniels, I think it would have fallen flat.
Perhaps I should have read the book.
6/10.
Once again we have a case of 'the book is better than the film/miniseries'.
I've read the book twice, and believe me, the book is better than this 6 episodes series.
My biggest critique about the mini series is that the dialogues are really poor, and of little substance. And thus not believable. Short scenes with few information are put behind each other. This also means that we don't get much to know about the main protagonists, nor about how Charlie Croker ended up in such financial perils.
It is strange to see that a man so affluent as Charlie Croker has not many staff members (1 attorney, 1 secretary and 1 accountant). It is strange to see when he shows up at decisive meetings he doesn't have a lot to say, but huff and bluff and puff. Same goes for the bank accountants too actually. Their case is not well built up. These business scenes don't come across as very believable. It all feels a bit grotesque, cartoonesque... The best episode is the last episode, in which there is a long court scene in which the attorney brings a strong plea for justice, and later a memorable speech of Charlie in Georgia Tech Stadium. There should have been more scenes like this. Maybe my expectiations were a bit too high, but I was a bit dissapointed all in all.
I've read the book twice, and believe me, the book is better than this 6 episodes series.
My biggest critique about the mini series is that the dialogues are really poor, and of little substance. And thus not believable. Short scenes with few information are put behind each other. This also means that we don't get much to know about the main protagonists, nor about how Charlie Croker ended up in such financial perils.
It is strange to see that a man so affluent as Charlie Croker has not many staff members (1 attorney, 1 secretary and 1 accountant). It is strange to see when he shows up at decisive meetings he doesn't have a lot to say, but huff and bluff and puff. Same goes for the bank accountants too actually. Their case is not well built up. These business scenes don't come across as very believable. It all feels a bit grotesque, cartoonesque... The best episode is the last episode, in which there is a long court scene in which the attorney brings a strong plea for justice, and later a memorable speech of Charlie in Georgia Tech Stadium. There should have been more scenes like this. Maybe my expectiations were a bit too high, but I was a bit dissapointed all in all.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizCharlie Croker was Michael Caine's character's name in The Italian Job.
- Curiosità sui creditiThe title card, 'A MAN IN FULL', gradually crumbles as the series progresses.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does A Man in Full have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- A Man in Full
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 45min
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 16:9 HD
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti