Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaWhen a US Army hospital on the remote island of Saipan is overrun by Japanese forces, a lone medic puts it all on the line to lead a band of wounded warriors to safety in this edge-of-your- ... Leggi tuttoWhen a US Army hospital on the remote island of Saipan is overrun by Japanese forces, a lone medic puts it all on the line to lead a band of wounded warriors to safety in this edge-of-your- seat WWII epic.When a US Army hospital on the remote island of Saipan is overrun by Japanese forces, a lone medic puts it all on the line to lead a band of wounded warriors to safety in this edge-of-your- seat WWII epic.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Recensioni in evidenza
At least I didn't hear a kookaburra...
Dreadful plot. Historically inaccurate. Geographically inaccurate. Biologically inaccurate. Guns with endless ammunition. Soldiers that bunch up together and still don't die. Soldiers that don't take cover and still don't die. Japanese soldiers that can't throw grenades around corners. Japanese soldiers that roam and attack in single file. Subtitles required for non US English speakers. 'Merica!
Three stars for knife action and manly grunting.
This movie is best skipped. It strains to evoke much at all in the viewer. It solipsistic in that you have no idea where the rest of the US military is located.
Dreadful plot. Historically inaccurate. Geographically inaccurate. Biologically inaccurate. Guns with endless ammunition. Soldiers that bunch up together and still don't die. Soldiers that don't take cover and still don't die. Japanese soldiers that can't throw grenades around corners. Japanese soldiers that roam and attack in single file. Subtitles required for non US English speakers. 'Merica!
Three stars for knife action and manly grunting.
This movie is best skipped. It strains to evoke much at all in the viewer. It solipsistic in that you have no idea where the rest of the US military is located.
Every male actor a hunk, every female actor a model. Then we get to the story; 'based on real events'. Yeah, very loosely. Casting should have been fired way before a camera was hired.
It just has that 80's made for TV feel, yup, worse than The A-Team, that bad. The dialogue is awful, the acting far too intense in the minor moments. Sometimes less is more, guys.
Of course the Japanese just throw themselves at machine guns like they were never trained in the basics. Of course the GI's are so proficient at unarmed combat. The Japanese would never have any idea about Karate or Jiu Jitsu. How could they despite inventing it?
Really not good in any way. Have the production team bigged this up on review sites? Mmmm?
It just has that 80's made for TV feel, yup, worse than The A-Team, that bad. The dialogue is awful, the acting far too intense in the minor moments. Sometimes less is more, guys.
Of course the Japanese just throw themselves at machine guns like they were never trained in the basics. Of course the GI's are so proficient at unarmed combat. The Japanese would never have any idea about Karate or Jiu Jitsu. How could they despite inventing it?
Really not good in any way. Have the production team bigged this up on review sites? Mmmm?
This must be a joke for sure.
There is nothing that just slightly resembles war or ww2 or even a war-movie. Amateur reenactors would do better.
The story is a great collection of ridiculous clichés, un-natural characters, stupid conversations.
First I was not able to watch it after the first half, but I forced myself and returned to see the similarly unexplainable second half.
Please don't do it, it's even worse than the beginning.
The makers have clearly no idea of anything.
Do yourself a favor and leave this movie out of your life, does not worth the few minutes to fast forward it through!
There is nothing that just slightly resembles war or ww2 or even a war-movie. Amateur reenactors would do better.
The story is a great collection of ridiculous clichés, un-natural characters, stupid conversations.
First I was not able to watch it after the first half, but I forced myself and returned to see the similarly unexplainable second half.
Please don't do it, it's even worse than the beginning.
The makers have clearly no idea of anything.
Do yourself a favor and leave this movie out of your life, does not worth the few minutes to fast forward it through!
After writing my senior thesis on Saipan it is surprising to me that they decided to make a movie victimizing the Americans. The battle was a failure to fight for survival by the Japanese. What they're trying to cover is a large push back order by general Saito. About 4,000 men were gathered and told to give their lives in a suicidal charge. This charge was ordered knowing that the Japanese had no hope. The soldiers charged with sticks and rocks and whatever they had left. The wounded were killed. The movie is completely baffling. Should focus on the Japanese POV if it wanted to serve history.
Perhaps I should've known better when I saw Casper's name in the cast list...
Obviously low budget but there have been lots of good movies made on a shoestring
Inaccuracies and anachronisms abound...
From plastic buckles on the military gear, to wrong uniforms... having to burn "sensitive documents" which are obviously photocopies...
The script is poorly written, the story is weak (while, given the events described, it did not have to be.)
The sets are poorly designed, as are the special effects (i.e. Gore, explosions, etc.)
Please, spare yourself the pain of my experience watching this, you, undoubtedly, have much better options available to you.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Battle for Saipan?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 34 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Battle for Saipan (2022) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi