Rich Flu
- 2024
- 1h 56min
Esplora fino a che punto le persone si spingono per salvarsi quando la ricchezza che ha fatto girare il mondo diventa il suo bene più pericoloso dopo che una strana malattia minaccia di ucci... Leggi tuttoEsplora fino a che punto le persone si spingono per salvarsi quando la ricchezza che ha fatto girare il mondo diventa il suo bene più pericoloso dopo che una strana malattia minaccia di uccidere chiunque abbia una qualche fortuna.Esplora fino a che punto le persone si spingono per salvarsi quando la ricchezza che ha fatto girare il mondo diventa il suo bene più pericoloso dopo che una strana malattia minaccia di uccidere chiunque abbia una qualche fortuna.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
Hope they didn't spend more than 100 dollars to make this movie because that's about what it looks like. The writing is laughably bad, the acting feels phoned in, and the pacing is a complete disaster. Nothing good to say about it-no redeeming qualities, no interesting ideas, just a frustrating waste of time.
It honestly feels like a 13-year-old scribbled down a half-baked script in an hour, and the next day, someone decided, "Yep, let's film this." The dialogue is cringeworthy, the plot makes no sense, and whatever message they were trying to deliver gets lost in the sheer absurdity of it all.
I want my time back. Avoid this movie at all costs.
It honestly feels like a 13-year-old scribbled down a half-baked script in an hour, and the next day, someone decided, "Yep, let's film this." The dialogue is cringeworthy, the plot makes no sense, and whatever message they were trying to deliver gets lost in the sheer absurdity of it all.
I want my time back. Avoid this movie at all costs.
The story appears to me super weak and the more I started to think about it and the way the actors did act in the film, the more I wanted to stop this film.
Like why is it only about the rich, if you get rid of your money, how can a virus/ bacteria/ whatever know this in real time. Or in case its something different, how could it know that you put a pile of bundled dollars on fire.
It just doesnt make any sense to me. Same for the strange conclusions and actions the actors did on certain events.
I think this film is a waste of time and I cannot recommend it.
I could manage 1hr15 mins. So maybe its better afterwards.
Like why is it only about the rich, if you get rid of your money, how can a virus/ bacteria/ whatever know this in real time. Or in case its something different, how could it know that you put a pile of bundled dollars on fire.
It just doesnt make any sense to me. Same for the strange conclusions and actions the actors did on certain events.
I think this film is a waste of time and I cannot recommend it.
I could manage 1hr15 mins. So maybe its better afterwards.
A virus that kills off the richest, most influential, and the most greedy sounds like a good idea. I loved The Platform (first one, not second) so of course it's worth watching Rich Flu considering it's the same writers and Director. Could it be they were high when they thought of this great concept, and continued to get high when they made it. The production is chaotic. The shaky camera work and jumpy editing made me feel sea-sick. This movie might have been better if written as a comedy or satire, especially with that bizarre "white glowing teeth" touch. Didn't work as an action drama and the characters were dull. Some components of this story were interesting, must have been part of the original great conception, but the way they weaved it together was poorly executed. What a waste of a big budget.
The plot was interesting - but executed terribly.
The acting is pretty solid (apart from Lorraine Bracco who was truly horrible).
Cinematography and set are ok.
But, the problem is that it's simply not a good movie. It's boring, has uninteresting characters and a very awkward pacing.
I gave it a 4/10 even though maybe a lower rating would actually be more apt.
The plot was interesting - but executed terribly.
The acting is pretty solid (apart from Lorraine Bracco who was truly horrible).
Cinematography and set are ok.
But, the problem is that it's simply not a good movie. It's boring, has uninteresting characters and a very awkward pacing.
I gave it a 4/10 even though maybe a lower rating would actually be more apt.
The acting is pretty solid (apart from Lorraine Bracco who was truly horrible).
Cinematography and set are ok.
But, the problem is that it's simply not a good movie. It's boring, has uninteresting characters and a very awkward pacing.
I gave it a 4/10 even though maybe a lower rating would actually be more apt.
The plot was interesting - but executed terribly.
The acting is pretty solid (apart from Lorraine Bracco who was truly horrible).
Cinematography and set are ok.
But, the problem is that it's simply not a good movie. It's boring, has uninteresting characters and a very awkward pacing.
I gave it a 4/10 even though maybe a lower rating would actually be more apt.
While nonsensical on many levels, I thought the premise of the film was interesting. I was fascinated to see how the world would 'connect the dots' of what was happening. But we're not witness to very much along those lines.
Instead, we're taken from 'normal world' to 'crazy world' in the flash of an eye. I realized after watching this movie, that the film makers wanted to sell their political viewpoint, but it didn't work for me.
Lastly, many films that are apocalyptical like this one, tend to use the same plot device of the protagonists needing to escape where they live, for safer ground far away, and the story revolves around their journey trying to get there. I found the journey to be boring, and I wasn't impressed once I had arrived. My rating = 5.
Instead, we're taken from 'normal world' to 'crazy world' in the flash of an eye. I realized after watching this movie, that the film makers wanted to sell their political viewpoint, but it didn't work for me.
Lastly, many films that are apocalyptical like this one, tend to use the same plot device of the protagonists needing to escape where they live, for safer ground far away, and the story revolves around their journey trying to get there. I found the journey to be boring, and I wasn't impressed once I had arrived. My rating = 5.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizDespite his prominence in the billings, Timothy Spall has only one scene in the movie, appearing circa 5 minutes.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Rich Flu?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 902.707 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 56 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti