2000 Mules

This entire wad is a chimera - a fantasy built to confirm your belief that Trump was cheated. At last you know how "they" did it! The fact that every single thing here is a lie or a deception won't matter.

For instance, all the video of "mules" at drop-boxes. D'Souza claims he has 1000 HOURS of this, but all we see are three or four clips of people dropping off a ballot. These are run repeatedly from different angles so the narrators can fantasize about what the "mules" must have been thinking. One person takes a selfie; from that comes the theory that pictures were demanded by mules paymasters. Another wears gloves; which is obviously to avoid fingerprints. She tosses those in the trash; clearly as instructed to do. Onlookers do nothing; certainly because they are too shocked to react. Etc.

In all those 1000 hours D'Souza has NONE that shows a person going to more than one box. Which is THE HEART of his mules theory, of course. So he FAKED those scenes with the actor Jacob Hyman, not listed in the film's main credits. And in all that video he has only one person dropping off several ballots. He calls this poor man a "criminal"; but it turns out that the ballots were his family's so perfectly legal. No apology from D'Souza - but he is being sued.

Then there's the cellphone data, which according to Gregg Phillips exactly confirm the theory of mules gathering ballots at non-profit organizations and distributing them around the city. The fact that locating someone AT a dropbox is impossible means nothing. And of course that data won't be released and the analyses can't be verified. And Gregg is responsible for the enormous lie that millions of illegals voted in 2016. His word here is equally worthless. And btw CRUCIAL to the film's claims.

Then there's the "non-profits" such as nursing homes, shelters, community centers, 4H homes etc. Thousands of staff there apparently coerced or tricked hundreds of thousands of residents to vote for Biden, then fed these ballots into the mules system. Strangely, none of these people or their victims or the mules have come forward or been found in all this time.

D'Souza doesn't leave it at tha. Every line of the script and every reaction is crafted to further the deception. And being professional work is very persuasive... especially to those who want desperately to believe. So we see people claiming that it's "irrefutable evidence of massive fraud".

A chimera - created from nothing but tearing our nation apart. That's the real crime here.

So what are they telling us? The Arizona woman doesn't actually say that anything criminal happened. Ballot transport there was legal until recently and no dates are mentioned, go figure. The camera videos are nothing even though the speaker says it's all suspicious. He says the geo tracking is suspicious too but they never follow up with anybody real. Just suspicion, suspicion, suspicion without proof. And lots of drama acting. What they said about them solving murders turns out to be a lie. I think it's all a lie.

This film essentially concocts a spy-movie plot, finds video clips that seem to support bits and pieces of that, and whips it into a gigantic conspiracy theory. And presents that to the viewer as "proven".

Look at the faked multi-dropbox scenes. Look at the faked dropbox screens (one in Moscow). Look at the unverified cellphone pattern charts. Look at the undated and therefore worthless whistleblower scene. Look at the innocent voters simply being called "criminals" by the panel! Listen to the unsupported fantasizing about "non-profits" victimizing hundreds of thousands of people.

Why do we have films like this? Late last year, when asked by an associate why he keeps pushing the Steal, Trump said: "It keeps my base motivated, and will help Republicans win".

So people like D'Souza and Phillips here are in demand. They can knock out conspiracy theory films like this on command, convincing countless people that their national election was stolen.

The supposed "geolocation" data is absolutely crucial to the film's claims.

But the idea that it could locate anyone at a drop box is ridiculous. Best case accuracy is 16', in an open field. The phone in your hand shows you a little better is because it joins in the processing - not the case for any of the film's data. In fact they only claimed 100' accuracy when they sent info to the Georgia authorities. Totally useless.

No supposed mule's phone is ever shown to be near any box.

The "geolocation analyst" is Gregg Phillips, who has no credentials or expertise in that field. He refuses to divulge his method as a "trade secret". He called journalists questioning him on it "terrorists". His claims of using a university supercomputer appear to be false. He promised to release his data but at the ballyhooed "Ripcord" event said... he had lost it all.

So all he actually has are his statements (i.e. Nothing) and the dummy video display mock-ups.

Phillips is notorious for simply claiming that millions of illegals had voted in 2016. No proof ever. Trump set up a task force to investigate this. It silently shut down 6 months later having found none. So... a massive falsehood on the public stage.

Why on earth would anyone believe Phillips about this now? Just because... you want to?

Cleverly staged to mask the fact that there's NO actual evidence! Nothing illegal is actually stated for Arizona. The people going to drop boxes aren't doing anything wrong. The one guy driving around with a bag of ballots is an actor. There are no verifications anywhere of the geotracking work. The scenes about non-profits is just what they "might" be doing... and are ridiculous. When you take all those out - there's nothing left.