What Is a Woman?
- 2022
- 1h 35min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
8,1/10
46.884
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
È la domanda che non sei autorizzato a porre. Il documentario che non vogliono che tu veda.È la domanda che non sei autorizzato a porre. Il documentario che non vogliono che tu veda.È la domanda che non sei autorizzato a porre. Il documentario che non vogliono che tu veda.
Gert Comfrey
- Self - Gender Affirming Therapist
- (as Gert Comfrey MTS LMFT)
Marci Bowers
- Self - Gender Confirmation Surgeon
- (as Dr. Marci Bowers)
Michelle Forcier
- Self - Pediatrician, Professor
- (as Michelle Forcier MD)
Patrick Grzanka
- Self - Professor, Women Gender and Sexuality Studies, University of Tennessee
- (as Dr. Patrick Grzanka)
Miriam Grossman
- Self - Adolescent and Adult Psychiatrist
- (as Miriam Grossman MD)
Rodrigo Lehtinen
- Self - Executive Director, National Center for Transgender Equality
- (as Rodrigo-Heng Lehtinen)
Mark Takano
- Self - D - California
- (as Rep. Mark Takano)
Scott Newgent
- Self - Founder, TReVoices
- (as Scott [Kellie] Newgent)
Sara Stockton
- Self - Clinical Supervisor
- (as Sara Stockton MA LMFT)
Jordan B. Peterson
- Self - Clinical Psychologist, Author
- (as Dr. Jordan Peterson)
Debra Soh
- Self - Author, The End of Gender
- (as Dr. Debra Soh)
Recensioni in evidenza
An incredibly important and insightful documentary for our time and surprisingly funny at times.
Highly recommended to anyone who is interested in the topic and wants to learn more about how gender has become politicized including what different people from various fields and communities have to say from both sides of the discussion. 10/10.
Highly recommended to anyone who is interested in the topic and wants to learn more about how gender has become politicized including what different people from various fields and communities have to say from both sides of the discussion. 10/10.
Despite the ruckus and waves this movie has seemingly caused, I think that before one judges it, one should give it a view. Perhaps there's a reason it's caused a fuss..
As with nearly any documentary, the writer does have a side he leans toward; however, that does not mean the information within is invalid. Both sides are interviewed and given a platform to speak "their truth." Both sides were also given a list of questions that would be asked. The difference was the answers given..or not given.
I must encourage a watch. It is a great wealth of information no matter where you fall.
I must encourage a watch. It is a great wealth of information no matter where you fall.
On the plus side
Gaps
- interviewed a lot of solemn, pious academics who could not give a non-circular answer to the question "what is a woman?"
Gaps
- not much investigative zeal; very partisan
- did not present the evidence from the UK, Swedish, Finnish and French medical regulators who are raising doubts about treating adolescents with puberty blockers and steroids. Lost opportunity to challenge American gender zealots.
So, its fairly well produced, it looks good (certainly comparable to other documentaries out there.) All of the technical aspects of the film are in order. Nothing truly stands out as exceptional, but everything is very much professional.
From an approach perspective, it really is more of a documentary than most "documentaries" in that, the main character (Matt Walsh) is asking questions to try and understand the opposing opinion. Most "Documentaries" have a side and then only interview supporting perspectives of the thesis. In this case, Walsh actually interviews the opposing side a lot. For that reason alone, this a more honest documentary. Now, fair-is-fair, I don't like the subject of documentaries to be the documentarian. I believe that would classify it as more journalistic or activist (a-la, Moore or Spurlock.) But it is a common documentary style.
That said, I guess we get into the meat of it and why people love it or hate it. As before mentioned, there is a lot of exchanges with opposing view points, and those view points did not make strong arguments. Did Walsh interview the actual leading experts on the subjects? Maybe, maybe not. They do have considerable credibility, but Walsh himself is by no means an expert in the field, so even if the people he's interviewing are not the leaders, it's not like it's an unfair fight.
I think if you're for or against this subject matter, it's probably a good film to watch. It's always good to know what the opposing arguments are, but for some reason this topic people get very passionate about. From a purely creative standpoint, I think it's great, not exceptional, but if you like documentaries, it's going to be one of the best ones this year.
From an approach perspective, it really is more of a documentary than most "documentaries" in that, the main character (Matt Walsh) is asking questions to try and understand the opposing opinion. Most "Documentaries" have a side and then only interview supporting perspectives of the thesis. In this case, Walsh actually interviews the opposing side a lot. For that reason alone, this a more honest documentary. Now, fair-is-fair, I don't like the subject of documentaries to be the documentarian. I believe that would classify it as more journalistic or activist (a-la, Moore or Spurlock.) But it is a common documentary style.
That said, I guess we get into the meat of it and why people love it or hate it. As before mentioned, there is a lot of exchanges with opposing view points, and those view points did not make strong arguments. Did Walsh interview the actual leading experts on the subjects? Maybe, maybe not. They do have considerable credibility, but Walsh himself is by no means an expert in the field, so even if the people he's interviewing are not the leaders, it's not like it's an unfair fight.
I think if you're for or against this subject matter, it's probably a good film to watch. It's always good to know what the opposing arguments are, but for some reason this topic people get very passionate about. From a purely creative standpoint, I think it's great, not exceptional, but if you like documentaries, it's going to be one of the best ones this year.
Love him or hate him, Matt Walsh has done a brilliant job on this documentary showing us the craziness of the people who believe in the trans movement. I know that Matt works for Daily Wire and they need to make money but I just wish they could have seen fit to release this everywhere for free. Matt and the makers of this film are not hating on people who are suffering form any delusions or depression, they are fighting for the children being abused at the hands of the people who believe they are better than their maker. Recommended viewing, not for the beautiful art, but for making you think about the way the culture is flowing.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizDue to controversy, the reviews for the film were hidden on Letterboxd, with blurb reading, "Due to a high volume of moderation traffic, reviews for this title are hidden at this time. Reviews remain visible on members' profiles, with the exception of those removed for violating our Community Policy."
- Citazioni
Matt Walsh: One of the drugs used is Lupron, right? Which has actually been used to chemically castrate sex offenders?
Self - Pediatrician, Professor: You know what? I'm not sure we should continue with this interview because it seems like it's going in a particular direction.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Daily Wire Backstage: What is a Woman? PREMIERE (2022)
- Colonne sonoreMan! I Feel Like a Woman!
Performed by Shania Twain
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is What Is a Woman??Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- ¿Qué es una mujer?
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti