Ten Pound Poms
- Serie TV
- 2023–
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,8/10
2254
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un gruppo di inglesi lascia la Gran Bretagna del dopoguerra nel 1956 per intraprendere un'avventura. La famiglia Roberts cerca di trarre il meglio dalla situazione, ma la vita al rifugio li ... Leggi tuttoUn gruppo di inglesi lascia la Gran Bretagna del dopoguerra nel 1956 per intraprendere un'avventura. La famiglia Roberts cerca di trarre il meglio dalla situazione, ma la vita al rifugio li mette alla prova, ma non sono gli unici.Un gruppo di inglesi lascia la Gran Bretagna del dopoguerra nel 1956 per intraprendere un'avventura. La famiglia Roberts cerca di trarre il meglio dalla situazione, ma la vita al rifugio li mette alla prova, ma non sono gli unici.
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 2 candidature totali
Sfoglia gli episodi
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Ten Pound Poms' delves into migration, cultural clashes, and British immigrants' struggles in 1950s Australia. Criticisms include historical inaccuracies, over-dramatization, and modern issues in a historical context. Acting and production values receive praise, though some find characters and storylines shallow. The show's portrayal of Australian society and sensitive topics like racism and sexism garner mixed reactions. Despite criticisms, many reviewers show interest in a potential second season.
Recensioni in evidenza
Not an unforgettable drama or a terrible one, somewhere in the middle. One of those shows where you should probably bail if the characters and storyline in the first episode don't grab you.
It had decent production values, with a few sound and lighting wobbles and a solid ensemble cast. Michelle Keegan's character felt a bit far-fetched in some of her endeavours, but fans will no doubt forgive her. One of its strengths was the number of strong female characters.
If you get on board with the first episode stay with it, if you don't jump ship as it continues along the same path.
On the downside there was a lot of heavy-handed messaging that didn't need to be there.
It had decent production values, with a few sound and lighting wobbles and a solid ensemble cast. Michelle Keegan's character felt a bit far-fetched in some of her endeavours, but fans will no doubt forgive her. One of its strengths was the number of strong female characters.
If you get on board with the first episode stay with it, if you don't jump ship as it continues along the same path.
On the downside there was a lot of heavy-handed messaging that didn't need to be there.
This is a very uneven season (not sure if it's a series) because far too much is thrown into 6 episodes. This would have benefited from 8 episodes or less story. A bit like when someone says look in a mirror before you leave and take off one accessory. I feel like we didn't get to know the characters as well as we should have done the more promising or interesting ones were left with little story development or left high and dry mid way thru. There's good performances from the leads with what they have to work with but overall the show won't leave you wanting a second season. I can't comment on the historical accuracy but as this is a drama entertainment show I'll presume it's loosely based on history so I'll lean heavily on the entertainment side of things. It's passes the time but is easily missable.
In the 60's most large establishments had switchboard operators , like Hotels and Hospitals . To make an overseas phone call you would call the international operator , give them the country and phone number and the operator would call back when call was connected . This series was set in 1956 . From the 40's and onwards everyone had Radios for music and entertainment as well as for the BBC news and Cricket . Throughout this series no one had a radio . Radios were as popular then as mobile phones are as popular today . Steven Curry was completely outstanding as J. J. plus all the main character child actors were really good .
Considering this is supposed to be 1956 I'm pretty sure designer stubble wasn't a thing then it's just not correct it just tries to appeal to modern life .
The two main women characters look more like 1940s with hairstyles from that period and Oxford bags weren't worn by women in mid 50s they would be in capri pants or narrow trousers . When the women are dressed up they are wearing just below the knee sun dresses this length didn't become fashionable until late 1950s.
This reminds me of heartbeat maybe that's the style setting somewhere loosely between 1940and 1965.apart from that it's very watchable.
The two main women characters look more like 1940s with hairstyles from that period and Oxford bags weren't worn by women in mid 50s they would be in capri pants or narrow trousers . When the women are dressed up they are wearing just below the knee sun dresses this length didn't become fashionable until late 1950s.
This reminds me of heartbeat maybe that's the style setting somewhere loosely between 1940and 1965.apart from that it's very watchable.
If I had to summarize my experience of watching 'Ten Pound Poms' so far I would have to say that Danny Brocklehurst was determined to work his story around xenophobia and racism, and chose the Labour Camp outside Sydney as his best way to integrate those themes, as it brought many races closer together. Unfortunately, it makes the story flat as every day we see Terry going off to do his bit in a hole in the ground, and in the evening he gets together with the other immigrants for a drink or party. It's a generalization of course, but many members of the Maltese side of my family went to Australia at this time and they ended up in the big cities. I think this makes the whole story seem untrue. There may have been one of two places that were like the camp, but they were probably the exception rather than the rule and this is where this story falls flat for me.
The production values, acting, scoring, cinematography are all world class. It's just that the story falls flat, it is too crowded, and the characters are not three dimensional enough. I will make an exception for the Terry character, and I think the Michelle Keegan character could have been worked better. The orphanage scene was embarrassing and unconvincing.
I think the subject material needed a more sensitive approach and probably should have come from someone with more first jhand experience of the process of emigration.
The production values, acting, scoring, cinematography are all world class. It's just that the story falls flat, it is too crowded, and the characters are not three dimensional enough. I will make an exception for the Terry character, and I think the Michelle Keegan character could have been worked better. The orphanage scene was embarrassing and unconvincing.
I think the subject material needed a more sensitive approach and probably should have come from someone with more first jhand experience of the process of emigration.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizLots of linguistic anachronisms. For example, in Episode 1 the word striker is used to describe a football forward, this term emerged in the 1970's and in Episode 2 someone uses the exclamation "Oh my days" which, although first noted in the late 19th century, was virtually unheard and only became commonplace in the 21st century.
- BlooperApart from a pipeline that never seemed to advance, in the background was clearly shown a yellow mini articulated dumpster (used by the crew?) that was not used in Australia for another fifty years.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does Ten Pound Poms have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Jauna dzīve par desmit mārciņām
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti