Feed
- 2022
- 1h 44min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,8/10
8548
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un gruppo di esperti di social media viene assunto per aiutare una vecchia azienda familiare a prosperare. Ma presto si ritrovano bloccati su una minuscola isola in un lago in cui si dice ch... Leggi tuttoUn gruppo di esperti di social media viene assunto per aiutare una vecchia azienda familiare a prosperare. Ma presto si ritrovano bloccati su una minuscola isola in un lago in cui si dice che viva un'antica strega svedese.Un gruppo di esperti di social media viene assunto per aiutare una vecchia azienda familiare a prosperare. Ma presto si ritrovano bloccati su una minuscola isola in un lago in cui si dice che viva un'antica strega svedese.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
I grew up with Joakim Lundell, therefore I may be more sympathetic when writing this review.
This movie is overall bad, but I'm glad to say that it is so bad that it becomes entertaining. The characters are extremely flat and unlikable and the dynamic between the characters is always super tense and awkward. They also have no common sense at all and makes the stupidest decisions imaginable, which makes it a bit entertaining.
I think the idea of the story overall is pretty interesting but it wasn't very well executed.
I'm looking forward to see Joakim Lundell's next movie to see what he might improve.
This movie is overall bad, but I'm glad to say that it is so bad that it becomes entertaining. The characters are extremely flat and unlikable and the dynamic between the characters is always super tense and awkward. They also have no common sense at all and makes the stupidest decisions imaginable, which makes it a bit entertaining.
I think the idea of the story overall is pretty interesting but it wasn't very well executed.
I'm looking forward to see Joakim Lundell's next movie to see what he might improve.
I have more character development in my turds! This movie was a huge dissapointment, I expected more from Joakim. It passed the first generations bechdel test but did not pass the second generation! Hugely dissapointed in the lack of differing ethnicitys. I've watched Joakims "spökjakt" and those videos actually provides scary jump scares which this movie fails at horribly. The ending with the twist doesn't deliever any message of any kind. Would rather buy 4 beers at Tullen then watch this misery buissnes. Joakim needs to work on his character development and atmosphere in his movies. Strong three out of ten<3.
One of the most annoiying and boring movie. I have ever watched the plot is just.ad Move barely bothers to disguise its pilferings from the DNA of other comedies. The self-sufficient neighbours are descended from the Goods of The Good Life. The grouchy shopkeeper who barks questions at an invisible husband out back is a straight lift from Little Britain. There are Tykeish traces of Last of the Summer Wine. The main joke of the recent sitcom This Country was that the countryside is a moral and intellectual cul-de-sac. But the show's main ancestor is Lead Balloon. Bad Move is Lead Balloon in wellies.
It's hard to tell yet whether Dee's grouchy web designer will be as good company as his perpetually thwarted writer in Lead Balloon, and whether rural Yorkshire's cast of supporting players can supply anything other than sketchy gargoyles. No one's exactly stretching themselves - Miles Jupp as the smug paterfamilias next door in particular feels like he's phoned one in he did earlier, and Seann Walsh as the overgrown rock star next door is a wild card with limited appeal.
At the moment it looks as if the script has sent away its knives for sharpening and not got them back yet. But Dee's miserablism is a gift that keeps on giving. "We can't even take the easy way out and slash our wrists," he concludes. Might have to see how this one pans out.
It's hard to tell yet whether Dee's grouchy web designer will be as good company as his perpetually thwarted writer in Lead Balloon, and whether rural Yorkshire's cast of supporting players can supply anything other than sketchy gargoyles. No one's exactly stretching themselves - Miles Jupp as the smug paterfamilias next door in particular feels like he's phoned one in he did earlier, and Seann Walsh as the overgrown rock star next door is a wild card with limited appeal.
At the moment it looks as if the script has sent away its knives for sharpening and not got them back yet. But Dee's miserablism is a gift that keeps on giving. "We can't even take the easy way out and slash our wrists," he concludes. Might have to see how this one pans out.
This movie is quite bad. I gave it a 4 (which is probably too high) due to the fact that I actually made it through all the way, albeit close to giving up a few times. Basically, it does nothing right: it's not scary, the story is not original or intriguing; it's very predictable; there are many irrational decisions being made by the characters; the psychology of the characters doesn't feel authentic. Sometimes the scenery was quite good, and the fact that it was so bad made it a little bit charming in a weird way. There might or might not be some talented folks involved in the making of this movie - probably not - but it's likely one of those cases where too many people submitted ideas (taken from other movies) and the actual creator(s) threw too much in there, creating a mess. I don't recommend this to anyone with the slightest ability of critical thinking - it will torture you. However, if you're an oblivious man or woman, this might be just for you.
I really did want to give this movie a honest chance because I like Joakim but it really was terrible.
The character development didn't exist what so ever, for all I care all of them could die and I would've forgotten about them the next scene.
The sound effect were so over the top that I almost thought some I've them were a joke. For example why would you add a jump scare sound to a small drone flying by?
The over all cheapness and lazyness it so apparent that I actually laughed at times. For example when a character almost drowns and. Lies on the bridge, why is her hair completely dry? And in the first scene, you can see the shadow of the Serbian girl when she jumps down in the grass.
The plot was so predictable that I said out loud what was going to happen next and 9/10 I was right.
My final judgement is that this is more of a YouTube video that a movie and it does not belong on the big screen. I prefer Wicca over this.
The character development didn't exist what so ever, for all I care all of them could die and I would've forgotten about them the next scene.
The sound effect were so over the top that I almost thought some I've them were a joke. For example why would you add a jump scare sound to a small drone flying by?
The over all cheapness and lazyness it so apparent that I actually laughed at times. For example when a character almost drowns and. Lies on the bridge, why is her hair completely dry? And in the first scene, you can see the shadow of the Serbian girl when she jumps down in the grass.
The plot was so predictable that I said out loud what was going to happen next and 9/10 I was right.
My final judgement is that this is more of a YouTube video that a movie and it does not belong on the big screen. I prefer Wicca over this.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Feed?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- 巫術
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Stoccolma, Svezia(location)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 2.200.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 76.475 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 44min(104 min)
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti