Emma accetta un lavoro come badante per una donna anziana senile. Cominciano a succedere cose strane in casa. Quello che Emma non sa è che la casa nasconde un segreto terrificante.Emma accetta un lavoro come badante per una donna anziana senile. Cominciano a succedere cose strane in casa. Quello che Emma non sa è che la casa nasconde un segreto terrificante.Emma accetta un lavoro come badante per una donna anziana senile. Cominciano a succedere cose strane in casa. Quello che Emma non sa è che la casa nasconde un segreto terrificante.
- Premi
- 3 vittorie e 3 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Whenever I review a film that I rated under 5 stars I tend to start by completely spoiling a plot and pre-checking that "yes" button asking me if my review contains spoilers. I'm doing this for the common viewer. If I spoil it for you, perhaps I'll save you from watching it, but in this case, there isn't really much to spoil. The plot can be summed up in a single sentence, but the creators must have thought it was so deep that it needed a many layered ending.
This should-have-been-a-short disaster contains about 20 minutes of screaming without any score behind it, so if you watch it, make sure you keep the volume down or your neighbors might call 911, because that's what normal people do when they hear scream and numerous gunshots in real life. Shoot. Is that a spoiler. Nah, don't think so.
This should-have-been-a-short disaster contains about 20 minutes of screaming without any score behind it, so if you watch it, make sure you keep the volume down or your neighbors might call 911, because that's what normal people do when they hear scream and numerous gunshots in real life. Shoot. Is that a spoiler. Nah, don't think so.
The story is actually pretty good but the acting is terrible.
It starts out pretty good and we actually thought this is going to be a very watchable movie. So we were pretty excited. But then reality sets in.
The lead female role plays her part "ok", but you cannot say that for the rest. There will be scenes where you think....it this a joke. You will loose interest but still curious enough to get through it.
It is actually a shame as this could have been way better if they just took their time to really see this through again before release.
We love movies and really wanted to like this more.
The reason for not givning a 1 start is because of the lead role and the story.
It starts out pretty good and we actually thought this is going to be a very watchable movie. So we were pretty excited. But then reality sets in.
The lead female role plays her part "ok", but you cannot say that for the rest. There will be scenes where you think....it this a joke. You will loose interest but still curious enough to get through it.
It is actually a shame as this could have been way better if they just took their time to really see this through again before release.
We love movies and really wanted to like this more.
The reason for not givning a 1 start is because of the lead role and the story.
You'd be hard pushed to find something worse.
It's not even a B movie, it's much further down the alphabet.
The acting is hideous- just pathetic. It's Hollyoaks with Eastern European accents. The 'action' scenes (I use the phrase lightly) are simply woeful. Laurel and Hardy looked more realistic.
Then there is the effort at suspenseful music- I think the pianist had 7 fingers amputated.
The story is weak as a can of Carling and there is absolutely nothing gripping about tge storyline or tge characters. At one point, I partly wanted the main protagonist to be killed just for being so utterly stupid. Avoid.
It's not even a B movie, it's much further down the alphabet.
The acting is hideous- just pathetic. It's Hollyoaks with Eastern European accents. The 'action' scenes (I use the phrase lightly) are simply woeful. Laurel and Hardy looked more realistic.
Then there is the effort at suspenseful music- I think the pianist had 7 fingers amputated.
The story is weak as a can of Carling and there is absolutely nothing gripping about tge storyline or tge characters. At one point, I partly wanted the main protagonist to be killed just for being so utterly stupid. Avoid.
After reading many negative reviews, I have to say I disagree. While this film's plot isn't Oscar-worthy, I enjoyed it as a solid psychological thriller.
The performances, especially from the main character, were convincing and kept me engaged. It relies on classic horror tools like jump scares and a creepy house, and these elements work well to create a tense and unsettling atmosphere.
The twists were well-timed, and it had moments that genuinely left me unsettled.
If I must criticize something, it would be the ending, which felt like an unnecessary story extension.
But IMHO, it's still worth a watch if you're into suspense and psychological thrillers.
The performances, especially from the main character, were convincing and kept me engaged. It relies on classic horror tools like jump scares and a creepy house, and these elements work well to create a tense and unsettling atmosphere.
The twists were well-timed, and it had moments that genuinely left me unsettled.
If I must criticize something, it would be the ending, which felt like an unnecessary story extension.
But IMHO, it's still worth a watch if you're into suspense and psychological thrillers.
Emma takes a job as a caregiver for a senile old woman. Strange things start happening in the house. What Emma doesn't know is that the house hides a terrifying secret.
The secret is this movie stinks. Nothing about it is good or real. From the outset, it's supposed to be set in NYC, 1989, but everyone seems to have a weird indistinguishable European accent.
Further, the sets are strange. In fact, the entire movie seems to have been shot in one old house with crumbling walls -- even shots not supposed to be in the main house seem to be in the same building. It all looks so similar.
And nothing looks like NYC at all. It all looks European. So, from the very beginning, you are confused. And then the bad acting sets in. And it's really bad.
Compounding this is the ridiculously slow pace of the film. It will put you to sleep. Truly one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time.
The secret is this movie stinks. Nothing about it is good or real. From the outset, it's supposed to be set in NYC, 1989, but everyone seems to have a weird indistinguishable European accent.
Further, the sets are strange. In fact, the entire movie seems to have been shot in one old house with crumbling walls -- even shots not supposed to be in the main house seem to be in the same building. It all looks so similar.
And nothing looks like NYC at all. It all looks European. So, from the very beginning, you are confused. And then the bad acting sets in. And it's really bad.
Compounding this is the ridiculously slow pace of the film. It will put you to sleep. Truly one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe story is set in New York, 1989. Days before the falling of the Berlin Wall.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Caregiver?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Будинок нечисті
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 26 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti