VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,6/10
2679
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Dopo la morte del nonno, un uomo viaggia con la moglie e i figli nella sua città natale, dove ne deriva il caos con i suoi parenti per l'eredità.Dopo la morte del nonno, un uomo viaggia con la moglie e i figli nella sua città natale, dove ne deriva il caos con i suoi parenti per l'eredità.Dopo la morte del nonno, un uomo viaggia con la moglie e i figli nella sua città natale, dove ne deriva il caos con i suoi parenti per l'eredità.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 14 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Each character in the movie is a symbol, an avatar of the many aspects of Mexico and it's people.
It feels like a dream, like a nightmare.
It uses cartoonish characters to make a point.
I don't think foreign audiences would be able to enjoy this movie as the language used and the symbols will be lost in translation.
Mexicans on the other hand will understand even tiny cameos of things and people in the movie.
This is not a subtle movie in any terms. Its very much in your face and it's better understood as satire.
I would like the director to make a movie about southeast Mexico, with actors from the area.
It feels like a dream, like a nightmare.
It uses cartoonish characters to make a point.
I don't think foreign audiences would be able to enjoy this movie as the language used and the symbols will be lost in translation.
Mexicans on the other hand will understand even tiny cameos of things and people in the movie.
This is not a subtle movie in any terms. Its very much in your face and it's better understood as satire.
I would like the director to make a movie about southeast Mexico, with actors from the area.
All formula tends to wear off. Director Estrada ran out of fresh ideas and this time he repeats what had worked for him in previous films only to make it clear that his style has become anachronistic.
A failed farce that is incapable of presenting a decent character build. Manichaean characters that remain in unfinished cartoons, cartoonish, mere stereotypes.
It is impossible for the viewer to empathize with this group of unsympathetic and unpleasant characters and with scatological scenes that border on the vulgar.
The only challenge the film presents is for the viewer's bladder. In an exercise in overflowing narcissism, the director makes a 190-minute tape! How if it were an epic of The Lord of the Rings. An excess considering the plot poverty it offers.
Even solvent actors like Alcázar and Cosío, despite each playing several characters, can do little in the face of the mediocrity that the script offers them.
A failed farce that is incapable of presenting a decent character build. Manichaean characters that remain in unfinished cartoons, cartoonish, mere stereotypes.
It is impossible for the viewer to empathize with this group of unsympathetic and unpleasant characters and with scatological scenes that border on the vulgar.
The only challenge the film presents is for the viewer's bladder. In an exercise in overflowing narcissism, the director makes a 190-minute tape! How if it were an epic of The Lord of the Rings. An excess considering the plot poverty it offers.
Even solvent actors like Alcázar and Cosío, despite each playing several characters, can do little in the face of the mediocrity that the script offers them.
Avoid watching this movie or you will suffer it twice: it's not just bad, it's long. Nothing more to say, avoid it like the plague.
It's a movie with jokes with no punchline, which leverages stereotype after stereotype to try (and fail) to make a half decent joke. The storyline Is repetivie with tons of divergent points that go nowhere and contribute nothing to the plot.
Characters are one dimensional, acting is passable at best, and many of them are just fluff that have tons of screen time but don't contribute to the storyline.
Camera shots and framing is boring, no nice landscapes and no interesting camera movements.
It's a movie with jokes with no punchline, which leverages stereotype after stereotype to try (and fail) to make a half decent joke. The storyline Is repetivie with tons of divergent points that go nowhere and contribute nothing to the plot.
Characters are one dimensional, acting is passable at best, and many of them are just fluff that have tons of screen time but don't contribute to the storyline.
Camera shots and framing is boring, no nice landscapes and no interesting camera movements.
This is a Bollywood length movie, a French Farce done Mexican style. There are all the hallmarks of a farce i.e tons of overacting, dalliances that make no sense and the usual silly characters that are commonplace in satires. Unfortunately, this one is just not well done, and is far too long. There are much better satires produced in Mexico that poke fun at the class structure, rich vs poor etc. The "jokes" in this one are all done poorly, and lack sophistication or good writing. It's amazing that it was funded at all, even more amazing that it could be streamed on a premier site like Netflix!
I understood the point of this movie's satire perfectly. And if you come from a small remote town in Mexico, you REALLY understand it.
So I applaud this film's producers for attempting to bring light to Mexico's underlying social problems. However, this film is very flawed.
For starters, 3 hours and 11 minutes is WAY too long for a comedic satire. Even TWO hours might have been way too long. So that right there was the film's major undoing.
The plot itself strikes me as odd (and yes, I fully know it is satire). The entire extended family in the small mining town is basically dirt poor. But the deceased grandfather is secretly filthy rich with who knows how many millions in gold and property. And he decides to leave it all to the one person in the family who needs it the LEAST?? I get that this is satire and it is meant as a subtle jab as to how poorly the country of Mexico manages its riches in reality. I get that. It still doesn't make sense. But I get that.
The only way I can make sense of this movie is that the producers used this film as a subtle way to say F YOU!! To Mexico's ignorant and selfish ways. They are trying to tell you that Mexicans only look out for themselves and no one else. And that's why Mexico is the way it is now.
It is grossly exaggerated. But there is SOME truth to that. For far too long, Mexico has failed to properly invest in itself because so many of their nation's richest people know that everyone else is just itching to take their money away at every turn. So instead of investing in the future of their country, they hoard it all for themselves instead.
So if that's what this film's message is, then I think I understood that part. But I didn't need 3 hours and 11 minutes of bland comedy to understand it.
So I applaud this film's producers for attempting to bring light to Mexico's underlying social problems. However, this film is very flawed.
For starters, 3 hours and 11 minutes is WAY too long for a comedic satire. Even TWO hours might have been way too long. So that right there was the film's major undoing.
The plot itself strikes me as odd (and yes, I fully know it is satire). The entire extended family in the small mining town is basically dirt poor. But the deceased grandfather is secretly filthy rich with who knows how many millions in gold and property. And he decides to leave it all to the one person in the family who needs it the LEAST?? I get that this is satire and it is meant as a subtle jab as to how poorly the country of Mexico manages its riches in reality. I get that. It still doesn't make sense. But I get that.
The only way I can make sense of this movie is that the producers used this film as a subtle way to say F YOU!! To Mexico's ignorant and selfish ways. They are trying to tell you that Mexicans only look out for themselves and no one else. And that's why Mexico is the way it is now.
It is grossly exaggerated. But there is SOME truth to that. For far too long, Mexico has failed to properly invest in itself because so many of their nation's richest people know that everyone else is just itching to take their money away at every turn. So instead of investing in the future of their country, they hoard it all for themselves instead.
So if that's what this film's message is, then I think I understood that part. But I didn't need 3 hours and 11 minutes of bland comedy to understand it.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizLupita mentions she's from San Pedro de los Saguaros, the same town in which "la legge di Erode (1999)" is set.
- ConnessioniReferences Los tres huastecos (1948)
- Colonne sonoreLas golondrinas
Performed by Brayan Martínez, Francisco Sánchez, Héctor Covarrubias, Iván Blanco, Martín de Jesús Saucedo, Juan Pablo Aguilera, Lorenzo Saucedo, Cristino Romo and Mauricio Hernández
Courtesy of Bandidos Films
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is ¡Que viva México!?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 161.222 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 79.718 USD
- 26 mar 2023
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 4.218.942 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione3 ore 11 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.0 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti