Una donna che gestisce il ristorante di spaghettini della sua famiglia riceve un invito a unirsi all'industria della ristorazione sotto la tutela di un infame chef.Una donna che gestisce il ristorante di spaghettini della sua famiglia riceve un invito a unirsi all'industria della ristorazione sotto la tutela di un infame chef.Una donna che gestisce il ristorante di spaghettini della sua famiglia riceve un invito a unirsi all'industria della ristorazione sotto la tutela di un infame chef.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
Very engaging film for any food lover. The main character played by Chutimon Chuengcharoensukying did a terrific job as an actress. You can really feel the emotions during the intense scenes. Sadly she was the only character with any depth. It felt like her world and everyone was just living in it. The supporting roles were kind of interesting but only surface level.
Many of the plot turns were pretty cheesy. The scenes of violence and the reasons behind them were random, weird and had no build up. The head chef was cool, and stoic, which is to be expected from many successful chefs, however, he had outbursts that didn't make that much sense.
There was a few ominous scenes of rich people living out their gluttony with depictions of them eating flesh-like food. It was a clear dynamic between rich people betrayed as greedy while low-status people betrayed as simply, caring, loving, yet frustrated. It was very interesting to see this depiction, especially during the flashback scene of the Head Chef's upbringing. The comment about the caviar had me burst out laughing.
The cinematography was enjoyable and the dishes looked great. Its probably was kept me engaged the most.
Overall, this film was good. I would recommend it for sure. Many aspects were rushed, and had little development, but remained exciting and had scenes that moved me. The ending will leave most with lots of questions and unfulfilled, but you will give reflections.
Many of the plot turns were pretty cheesy. The scenes of violence and the reasons behind them were random, weird and had no build up. The head chef was cool, and stoic, which is to be expected from many successful chefs, however, he had outbursts that didn't make that much sense.
There was a few ominous scenes of rich people living out their gluttony with depictions of them eating flesh-like food. It was a clear dynamic between rich people betrayed as greedy while low-status people betrayed as simply, caring, loving, yet frustrated. It was very interesting to see this depiction, especially during the flashback scene of the Head Chef's upbringing. The comment about the caviar had me burst out laughing.
The cinematography was enjoyable and the dishes looked great. Its probably was kept me engaged the most.
Overall, this film was good. I would recommend it for sure. Many aspects were rushed, and had little development, but remained exciting and had scenes that moved me. The ending will leave most with lots of questions and unfulfilled, but you will give reflections.
This film is a commentary on socioeconomic class-divide through food, but not your typical "wow, that's fancy looking food" kinda movie from the food-drama sub-genre.
Plot Aoy (Remember the actor from Bad Genius?), who runs a family noodle shop, wants to be 'special', wants more from life. But how far is she willing to go to become a famous chef? Can she handle everything that will come the fame?
Take Social commentary can sometimes feel too preachy, either the rich or poor side can be made to seem very villainous, but I thought it was fairly balanced here. While there is nothing mind-blowing here, the satire and drama were balanced. Good acting by everybody and also well shot. It's a slow-burn of sorts but the film has a message, that....is thought-provoking, to say the least.
Plot Aoy (Remember the actor from Bad Genius?), who runs a family noodle shop, wants to be 'special', wants more from life. But how far is she willing to go to become a famous chef? Can she handle everything that will come the fame?
Take Social commentary can sometimes feel too preachy, either the rich or poor side can be made to seem very villainous, but I thought it was fairly balanced here. While there is nothing mind-blowing here, the satire and drama were balanced. Good acting by everybody and also well shot. It's a slow-burn of sorts but the film has a message, that....is thought-provoking, to say the least.
Tries to hard, but I still found this movie enjoyable. All the ingredients for a great movie are here, but they have been overcooked into a kind of mainstream stew.
Acting performances are for the most on point. Presentation and production value are there and deliver. Basically most aspects are done pretty well. But sometimes it is very over dramatic, ridiculous and features a few tropes. It comes across self-indulgent and takes itself too seriously.
Apart from that, you will find a mostly interesting story that takes one or two unexpected turns and is well executed. It offers a little change if you're currently having a limited palette.
Acting performances are for the most on point. Presentation and production value are there and deliver. Basically most aspects are done pretty well. But sometimes it is very over dramatic, ridiculous and features a few tropes. It comes across self-indulgent and takes itself too seriously.
Apart from that, you will find a mostly interesting story that takes one or two unexpected turns and is well executed. It offers a little change if you're currently having a limited palette.
Hunger is a compelling and thought-provoking film that explores the world of cooking and the class divide that exists in society. The movie follows the story of Auy, a young cook who manages her father's old noodle house. Auy is given the opportunity to work with Chef Paul, the owner of a very popular catering business that caters to the elite.
The film's portrayal of the culinary world is captivating, and the cinematography is excellent. The photography of the cooking process is especially impressive, and it truly brings the audience into the kitchen. The film does an excellent job of showing the stark difference between the food that the poor and the rich eat.
As the story progresses, Auy realizes that she cannot condone Chef Paul's policies and unlawful acts. She decides to quit and forms her own cooking team with the help of an entrepreneur. Her restaurant, Flame, quickly becomes a phenomenon in social media, and she is able to compete with Chef Paul when they are both invited to cook for a socialite personality.
However, the film's ending falls short of expectations. It feels somewhat rushed, and the resolution is not as satisfying as it could have been. The film could have benefited from a different ending that tied up loose ends and provided a more satisfying conclusion.
Overall, Hunger is a movie worth watching for foodies and those interested in exploring social issues through the culinary world. Despite the lackluster ending, the film's excellent cinematography and compelling story make it a must-see.
The film's portrayal of the culinary world is captivating, and the cinematography is excellent. The photography of the cooking process is especially impressive, and it truly brings the audience into the kitchen. The film does an excellent job of showing the stark difference between the food that the poor and the rich eat.
As the story progresses, Auy realizes that she cannot condone Chef Paul's policies and unlawful acts. She decides to quit and forms her own cooking team with the help of an entrepreneur. Her restaurant, Flame, quickly becomes a phenomenon in social media, and she is able to compete with Chef Paul when they are both invited to cook for a socialite personality.
However, the film's ending falls short of expectations. It feels somewhat rushed, and the resolution is not as satisfying as it could have been. The film could have benefited from a different ending that tied up loose ends and provided a more satisfying conclusion.
Overall, Hunger is a movie worth watching for foodies and those interested in exploring social issues through the culinary world. Despite the lackluster ending, the film's excellent cinematography and compelling story make it a must-see.
The Thai food movie that's a mix of "The Menu" and "Whiplash" is somewhat similar in some ways, but it's not entirely a copy because it has its own storyline. The story is about a middle-class girl who dreams of elevating herself in high society by showcasing her cooking skills. However, her successful recipe doesn't make her as famous as she expected, and the villainous chef is straightforwardly evil. The characters lack depth in the latter part of the movie, turning it into a typical good vs. Evil scenario, leading to a happy ending that's too easy and predictable. Darker viewers may be slightly disappointed, but overall, the movie is enjoyable, with the lead actor charmingly portraying the role, making the viewers engaged in every scene. There are many beautifully shot cooking scenes, and the production value is high. It is the first Thai movie on Netflix that feels like it has reached a high international standard.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe house in the opening scene is the same as that of the movie Parasite
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Hunger?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 26min(146 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti