Je verrai toujours vos visages
- 2023
- 1h 58min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,5/10
4487
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Dal 2014, in Francia, la giustizia offre alle vittime e agli autori di reati l'opportunità di dialogare attraverso sistemi sicuri, supervisionati da professionisti e volontari come Judith, F... Leggi tuttoDal 2014, in Francia, la giustizia offre alle vittime e agli autori di reati l'opportunità di dialogare attraverso sistemi sicuri, supervisionati da professionisti e volontari come Judith, Fanny o Michel.Dal 2014, in Francia, la giustizia offre alle vittime e agli autori di reati l'opportunità di dialogare attraverso sistemi sicuri, supervisionati da professionisti e volontari come Judith, Fanny o Michel.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 9 candidature totali
Suliane Brahim
- Fanny
- (as Suliane Brahim de la Comédie Française)
Denis Podalydès
- Paul
- (as Denis Podalydès de la Comédie Française)
Recensioni in evidenza
The topic is not the same, but the overall atmosphere and more or less scheme, kind of drama, reminded me TWELVE ANGRY MEN, a story which takes mostly place in one room - whithout being a trial - involving people, men and woman, victims and perpetrators, facing each other, and trying to talk, explaining, showing, confessing what they felt....it has never been done before and that makes it even more powerful, astounding. It is purely stunning. Terrific dialogues. However, I can understand that some audiences may be annoyed , because it is naive, unrealistic. That's a matter of taste, point of view, that depends of which angle you watch it. Something is wrong in the story lines, when a young hoodlums speaks of a home jacking where he and his pals took credit cards with the secret code to retrieve money from the cash machines. In France, with a credit card - stolen or not - you can retrieve ONLY 400 euros each week. So when this hoodlum says that one of his pals bought a new motorcycle with his share of the loot, that's not possible.... The hoodlums could only at best retrieve 400 euros. Because a few hours after the homejacking, the victimes have necessarily declared the robbery to their bank. 400 euros shared between three, that's doesn't allow anyone to buy a new motorcycle. No way. And the most unusual is that you have two different stories in this film: the group and Chloée character problems with her half brother. They never meet. Strange but why not.
It seems exactly like the type of films that I cannot remain indifferent to. So realistic and such a compelling story. It is exactly what I have expected from this movie to be. An internal and uncontrolled storm that doesn't let its viewers to stay calm.
The thoughts are running to so many directions and the work of the director: Jeanne Herry, which has made the great "Pupille" is just so accurate, that you sometimes feel that you are in the same room with the same people that are opening themselves to strangers, that are at a different spot.
The film is talking about a special program that is bringing crime victims and criminals that made the same crime (or even the crime itself) together. It is a healing process that requires both sides to be open minded and try to tolerant to towards the other side.
The movie is talking about traumas that not sure anyone, that hasn't suffered those types of "Minor" traumatizing experiences will understand. It is taking people from a wide range and dives into each one of them and into its traumatic experience and lesson learning, that takes place while they speak.
It is an experience like no other, for the movie industry and a great achievement in directing and acting. Takes each and every one of the viewers from his safe spot and confronts with reality and still has a lot of hope and redemption in it. Very special film and experience that not every viewer can withstand, but for movies lovers, it is a must.
The thoughts are running to so many directions and the work of the director: Jeanne Herry, which has made the great "Pupille" is just so accurate, that you sometimes feel that you are in the same room with the same people that are opening themselves to strangers, that are at a different spot.
The film is talking about a special program that is bringing crime victims and criminals that made the same crime (or even the crime itself) together. It is a healing process that requires both sides to be open minded and try to tolerant to towards the other side.
The movie is talking about traumas that not sure anyone, that hasn't suffered those types of "Minor" traumatizing experiences will understand. It is taking people from a wide range and dives into each one of them and into its traumatic experience and lesson learning, that takes place while they speak.
It is an experience like no other, for the movie industry and a great achievement in directing and acting. Takes each and every one of the viewers from his safe spot and confronts with reality and still has a lot of hope and redemption in it. Very special film and experience that not every viewer can withstand, but for movies lovers, it is a must.
I believe in Empathy. And compassion. And forgiveness.
Hence the first scene was strong, astounding to me.
I heard something like: "No empathy here". Well, quite intriguing moto, I thought.
I was led through the parallel processes in the movie delighted by the sheer cleanness of accuracy of its point of view as well as THE LACK OF manipulating me to drown in bitter-sweet-cheap-drama.
Nearly all scenes exhibits a great opportunity to fall deep down sentimentalism - but Jeanne Herry keeps on being focused, consistent, on course.
With great appreciation as well as thanks I got a peek to a totally new way of approach to life's bumps, obstacles, pains.
I never heard about Restorative Justice before.
It's kind of wonder for me to see a way that generates Empathy, Compassion and Forgiveness - especially inwards, toward oneself maybe even before practicing it to others.
Hence the first scene was strong, astounding to me.
I heard something like: "No empathy here". Well, quite intriguing moto, I thought.
I was led through the parallel processes in the movie delighted by the sheer cleanness of accuracy of its point of view as well as THE LACK OF manipulating me to drown in bitter-sweet-cheap-drama.
Nearly all scenes exhibits a great opportunity to fall deep down sentimentalism - but Jeanne Herry keeps on being focused, consistent, on course.
With great appreciation as well as thanks I got a peek to a totally new way of approach to life's bumps, obstacles, pains.
I never heard about Restorative Justice before.
It's kind of wonder for me to see a way that generates Empathy, Compassion and Forgiveness - especially inwards, toward oneself maybe even before practicing it to others.
Without a shadow of a doubt I am saying this is the best movie I've seen in 2023 and I've seen a lot. Also, this is the first one on restorative justice (a program that bonds criminals and victims in order for criminals to become aware of the harm they inflicted, feel remorse and change), and it was a real eye-opener. It both opened my eyes to see the fruit of this hard work done by amazing people, a lot of them being volunteers, who believe in this system; and made these eyes cry. It takes a lot of courage and perseverance to keep going and do this work that might seem totally impossible at the outset.
I am thanking all the people involved in making this film because we need to know that this exists, that this works, and that broken lives (both the victims' and the criminals') can be mended, and start anew. Bravo! Je verrai toujours vos visages.
I am thanking all the people involved in making this film because we need to know that this exists, that this works, and that broken lives (both the victims' and the criminals') can be mended, and start anew. Bravo! Je verrai toujours vos visages.
One film, one theme, two storylines. A confrontation between victims and perpetrators, which should have added value for each side. The one in which people with no direct connection meet seems to bring the desired insights and peace. Naive, but perhaps. Aversion, getting to know each other, understanding. Just a film, idealistic. But at least one that literally shows its colours regarding the perpetrators of the current crime terror over Europe. Of course, the usual explanations and excuses for the escalation of character are used: poverty, education, opportunities. Yawn. Everyone chooses their own exits at the crossroads of morality. But yes, otherwise this film would certainly not have ended up on the big screen, or would have been crucified by the media instead of being showered with awards. In my opinion, the softening of concepts such as perpetrator, victim and guilt are questionable approaches and primarily benefit injustice.
The other side works less well in its catharsis. Understandably, the resurgence of all pain through direct contact with the perpetrator is an emotional one-way street.
I went to see the film because it featured some of the cinematic greats of French cinema, but I can only recommend it to a limited extent. No resonance, no added value. Nevertheless, it is a high-quality production, well acted and at least endeavours to keep its feet on the ground. If I imagine this as a German production, ouch.
The other side works less well in its catharsis. Understandably, the resurgence of all pain through direct contact with the perpetrator is an emotional one-way street.
I went to see the film because it featured some of the cinematic greats of French cinema, but I can only recommend it to a limited extent. No resonance, no added value. Nevertheless, it is a high-quality production, well acted and at least endeavours to keep its feet on the ground. If I imagine this as a German production, ouch.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizTo research the subject, writer/director Jeanne Herry couldn't take part in actual meetings of restorative justice, given that they are supposed to be a safe place, and nothing that is said there is meant to be told elsewhere. So instead, she went through three formations, which she felt were very insightful: the one which Fanny and Michel go through in the movie, the one to be a mediator, like Judith in the movie, and one in Québec via Zoom.
- ConnessioniReferences La parola ai giurati (1957)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is All Your Faces?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Las dos caras de la justicia
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Place des Prêcheurs, Aix-en-Provence, Bouches-du-Rhône, Francia(Chloé's apartment)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 9.065.011 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 58min(118 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti