Gandeevadhari Arjuna

The story is great but the directing is very very weak. The flash memory clips could have been published in the movie somehow, or handed over to a responsible person, but the story of the movie is very long and revolves around the method of handing over the evidence.

.. .. The story is great but the directing is very very weak. The flash memory clips could have been published in the movie somehow, or handed over to a responsible person, but the story of the movie is very long and revolves around the method of handing over the evidence.

.. ... The story is great but the directing is very very weak. The flash memory clips could have been published in the movie somehow, or handed over to a responsible person, but the story of the movie is very long and revolves around the method of handing over the evidence.

This film should be banned. The images of REAL children with certain diseases, such as harlequin ichthyosis, were used WITHOUT their knowledge and without their permission. The film makers prostituted these children's images for their own shock value and monetary gain. It is appalling, it is wrong, and they need to be held accountable. These children have diseases that they work hard to bring awareness to on a daily basis. Their images are used on other accounts calling them "monster babies" and saying they don't deserve to live. ALL human life is planned and precious. These film makers have undone all of this in about 30 seconds. They, too, are guilty of making these children out to be monsters, when they are just babies fighting for their lives. PLEASE BAN THIS MOVIE!!!

"Gaandeevadhari Arjuna (2023)" turned out to be one of those films that reaffirm why some viewers hesitate to watch Tamil movies. It left me thoroughly disappointed and bored, making it a movie I cannot recommend.

At first glance, the movie appeared promising with its intriguing background, but it ultimately fell short of expectations. The disappointment was palpable as the film failed to live up to its initial allure. Even my wife, who has a penchant for Hindi and Tamil cinema, shared my sentiments, labeling it as subpar.

One of the major letdowns was the main actor's performance. The fighting sequences and acting failed to meet the anticipated standard, leaving much to be desired. Additionally, the screenplay and direction didn't rise to the occasion, resulting in a lackluster cinematic experience. The storyline, too, felt disjointed and off-kilter, further contributing to the overall disappointment.

In summary, "Gaandeevadhari Arjuna (2023)" is a movie that I strongly advise against watching. It failed to deliver on multiple fronts, from the main actor's performance to the scriptwriting, directing, and storyline. Save yourself the time and frustration and opt for a more satisfying cinematic experience elsewhere.

The whole movie is centred around a journalist transporting a storage device containing File-13, which contains proof of a company's misdeeds, to a minister, so that he can release it at UN summit.

But this file-13 is revealed to be a video file and I don't really understand why people are physically transporting the storage containing the file, when they could just sent it online.

Usually in movies like this, there will be a reason as to why the file cannot be released to public as it will have some sort of negative impact if public learns about it. But in this movie, releasing the file online would be an instant win for the good guys.

The movie would be over in 5 minutes if the journalist just uploaded the video to Twitter . Or she could have sent the video to the minister and then the minister could have posted it or given it to media.

It's unfortunate that there is such a large plot hole because the movie was shot well as well as acted well. But it's very hard to enjoy a movie when there is such a large plot hole.

I don't usually give reviews but had to for this one as this was suvh a sh**tty screen play and direction. I don't understand why directors won't be practical and repeat same old movies. It's just torture for audience.

....

.

. .

I don't usually give reviews but had to for this one as this was suvh a sh**tty screen play and direction. I don't understand why directors won't be practical and repeat same old movies. It's just torture for audience. I don't usually give reviews but had to for this one as this was suvh a sh**tty screen play and direction. I don't understand why directors won't be practical and repeat same old movies. It's just torture for audience.