VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,7/10
2854
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Il piano per tornare a casa il più breve possibile inizia a sgretolarsi mentre Eric trova un equilibrio tra il difficile rapporto con le sue due sorelle e la sua dipendenza dal poker locale.Il piano per tornare a casa il più breve possibile inizia a sgretolarsi mentre Eric trova un equilibrio tra il difficile rapporto con le sue due sorelle e la sua dipendenza dal poker locale.Il piano per tornare a casa il più breve possibile inizia a sgretolarsi mentre Eric trova un equilibrio tra il difficile rapporto con le sue due sorelle e la sua dipendenza dal poker locale.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 3 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Such a movie is simply necessary to bring your personal psychological state back to normal. It is like a magic balm that helps in this soulless digital world to understand that you are not completely stale yet, that you can still feel and empathize. Previously, there were many times more such paintings, but now it is a rarity and it is a real crime to pass by it.
The plot is unpretentious, but the very history of the relationship between a brother and two sisters does not require otherwise. Eric (Michael Cera) and Rachel (Hannah Gross) make scenes for each other throughout the film, and poor Maggie (Sophia Lillis) finds herself between two fires, while trying in every possible way to reconcile them and terribly worried that nothing will come of it. The early loss of parents still leaves a mark on all this. Eric is a complete gamer who absolutely does not know how to lose, Rachel cannot leave the betrayal of a loved one in the past, Maggie dropped out of school and cannot decide what to do next in her life. Everyone has problems, and against this background, a meeting of brothers and sisters who have not seen each other for a very long time could help them all. But communication after a long break is not easy at all. And all because they have become adults. Only a passion for poker makes Eric postpone his departure over and over again, giving hope to Maggie that everything will work out.
Separately for Maggie - this character was as if specially written for the wonderful and inimitable Sophia Lillis. It seems that she does not play, but simply behaves as she does in life. I can't remember a greater immediacy in the frame. She can joke merrily, and in a second lower her head and sadly lower her blue eyes to the ground. The role is played superbly, because you are only worried about her throughout the film, the problems of her older brother and sister, coupled with personal disorder in life, greatly undermined her psychological state.
A very touching moment at the beginning of the film, when Eric came to Maggie's house in the morning and said that in order to communicate with her and Rachel, he would stay for another day. She cried and buried herself in his chest, and it was so natural that tears welled up in me myself.
Yes, the movie is not without its drawbacks, but I personally really liked it, the ending is warm and pleasant. This story makes you remember that your relationships with loved ones are also, to put it mildly, far from ideal, that you need to love and protect your relatives, because there is nothing more important than this.
9 out of 10
For a good, helpful story and the lovely Sophia Lillis.
The plot is unpretentious, but the very history of the relationship between a brother and two sisters does not require otherwise. Eric (Michael Cera) and Rachel (Hannah Gross) make scenes for each other throughout the film, and poor Maggie (Sophia Lillis) finds herself between two fires, while trying in every possible way to reconcile them and terribly worried that nothing will come of it. The early loss of parents still leaves a mark on all this. Eric is a complete gamer who absolutely does not know how to lose, Rachel cannot leave the betrayal of a loved one in the past, Maggie dropped out of school and cannot decide what to do next in her life. Everyone has problems, and against this background, a meeting of brothers and sisters who have not seen each other for a very long time could help them all. But communication after a long break is not easy at all. And all because they have become adults. Only a passion for poker makes Eric postpone his departure over and over again, giving hope to Maggie that everything will work out.
Separately for Maggie - this character was as if specially written for the wonderful and inimitable Sophia Lillis. It seems that she does not play, but simply behaves as she does in life. I can't remember a greater immediacy in the frame. She can joke merrily, and in a second lower her head and sadly lower her blue eyes to the ground. The role is played superbly, because you are only worried about her throughout the film, the problems of her older brother and sister, coupled with personal disorder in life, greatly undermined her psychological state.
A very touching moment at the beginning of the film, when Eric came to Maggie's house in the morning and said that in order to communicate with her and Rachel, he would stay for another day. She cried and buried herself in his chest, and it was so natural that tears welled up in me myself.
Yes, the movie is not without its drawbacks, but I personally really liked it, the ending is warm and pleasant. This story makes you remember that your relationships with loved ones are also, to put it mildly, far from ideal, that you need to love and protect your relatives, because there is nothing more important than this.
9 out of 10
For a good, helpful story and the lovely Sophia Lillis.
I like(d) Michael Cera (the leading actor) comical charisma before in many other movies, one being in Barbie recently. Michael Cera was even producer of this movie himself so he must have had a lot of cloud to mold this movie, but it unfortunately fell flat.
The bad: it isnst a comedy, not even a quirky one. It isnt a drama for sure either. It is some sort of slowburning and BLAND portrait of 3 siblings (1 brother, 2 sisters) who get together again after a long time no see.
No surprising storyline. No original direction. No impressive technical details (sound, photography). No actor's chemistry.
I guess they wanted to create a quirky, comical personal portrait, but they failed big time...
The bad: it isnst a comedy, not even a quirky one. It isnt a drama for sure either. It is some sort of slowburning and BLAND portrait of 3 siblings (1 brother, 2 sisters) who get together again after a long time no see.
No surprising storyline. No original direction. No impressive technical details (sound, photography). No actor's chemistry.
I guess they wanted to create a quirky, comical personal portrait, but they failed big time...
I made it halfway through. Not only is it a very slow slice-of-life film, the main character (Michael Cera's Eric) is so repellent, I just didn't want to spend any more time with him. He is inconsiderate, self-absorbed, cold, oblivious, and shallow. He blows off all these people who made plans to spend time with him in his rare visit, with barely a 'sorry.' Both of his sisters are obviously suffering, and he doesn't even seem to notice, let alone care. He even scolds the one who adores him. At one point, he shows what really matters to him (and it's not anyone else), and asks her why the other sister 'hates him.' The short answer is that he is just a JERK. The real question is why there is anyone in his life who actually tolerates him.
Did Michael Cera lose a bet? My new least favourite movie. So odd, so so bad. A steaming pile of art that missed the canvass. Soulless and irritating. After the first 20 minutes I kept watching out of pure morbid curiosity for how it could possible end. It says the runtime was one hour and thirty one minutes, but the second and third acts just barrelled on for what felt like weeks. I aged watching this film. I need two hundred more characters for this review, so I'll finish by listing things I'd rather watch: paint dry, puppies cry, YouTube videos of 1990s commercials, promotional videos for timeshare condos, the Montreal Canadians.
A weird trio of siblings that simply don't know how to communicate or never got the opportunity to grow up and relate to each other in a different, more meaningful way than that when they were little children.
Other than that, the seemingly endless stream of drama that comes from these people's trauma and unresolved issues just occupy the screen almost 100% of the time.
There is no history to be told here, no character development, no proper light and shade, no dynamic that makes watching this even remotely tolerable.
I would recommend avoiding it, as there are so many better alternatives to do with your time out there - better movies and activities alike.
Other than that, the seemingly endless stream of drama that comes from these people's trauma and unresolved issues just occupy the screen almost 100% of the time.
There is no history to be told here, no character development, no proper light and shade, no dynamic that makes watching this even remotely tolerable.
I would recommend avoiding it, as there are so many better alternatives to do with your time out there - better movies and activities alike.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizMichael Cera wrote the childhood songs the siblings perform.
- Colonne sonoreL-Train
Written by Jordan Pilz, Daniel Alvarez de Toledo
Performed by TOLEDO
Courtesy of Grand Jury Music
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Adults?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 31min(91 min)
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti