Segue un nuovo adattamento del famoso romanzo di Alexandre Dumas.Segue un nuovo adattamento del famoso romanzo di Alexandre Dumas.Segue un nuovo adattamento del famoso romanzo di Alexandre Dumas.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 6 vittorie e 18 candidature totali
Laurent Lafitte
- Gérard de Villefort
- (as Laurent Lafitte de la Comédie Française)
Stéphane Varupenne
- Caderousse
- (as Stéphane Varupenne de la Comédie Française)
Abde Maziane
- Jacopo
- (as Abdé Maziane)
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'The Count of Monte-Cristo' adaptation garners mixed reactions, highlighting visual richness, strong performances, and deviations from the original novel. Praise is given to the cinematography, production design, and Pierre Niney's portrayal of Edmond Dantès. However, the script faces criticism for altering key plot points, characters, and the novel's ending, which many feel reduces the story's depth and emotional impact. Some appreciate the modernization and streamlined narrative, while others miss the novel's complexity and moral dilemmas.
Recensioni in evidenza
It is always tricky to approach something as complex as this novel and try to get a coherent movie that features all the plots, and sub-plots, and sub-sub-plots, let alone book accurate characters.
I enjoyed the Richard Chamberlain TV movie, and the 2002 film despite some wholesale plot chopping in both. Even the 1998 6 hour 23 minute miniseries couldn't do the complete story and that's been my definite adaptation for the last 25 years.
The point being that to fit into 3 hours it was clear that some plot-lines were going to axed, characters changed and a streamlining of the narrative.
It then becomes a case of whether it was done in a way that allows those who don't already know the story, those who may have read the book three or four times, and all those in between to enjoy it.
Clearly the producers understood the underlying themes and (apart from one quibble I had which I'm not going to post as a spoiler) did great service to the original and still managed to include some sub-plots I thought they were going to cut out.
Of course, if you're a purist who hated Lord of the Rings because Peter Jackson changed characters and aspects from a 100% faithful adaptation of the book then you aren't going to like this either.
Totally entertained and it never once felt like a 3 hour film.
It also has a great soundtrack, the reprise of which had me stay for the whole credits.
I enjoyed the Richard Chamberlain TV movie, and the 2002 film despite some wholesale plot chopping in both. Even the 1998 6 hour 23 minute miniseries couldn't do the complete story and that's been my definite adaptation for the last 25 years.
The point being that to fit into 3 hours it was clear that some plot-lines were going to axed, characters changed and a streamlining of the narrative.
It then becomes a case of whether it was done in a way that allows those who don't already know the story, those who may have read the book three or four times, and all those in between to enjoy it.
Clearly the producers understood the underlying themes and (apart from one quibble I had which I'm not going to post as a spoiler) did great service to the original and still managed to include some sub-plots I thought they were going to cut out.
Of course, if you're a purist who hated Lord of the Rings because Peter Jackson changed characters and aspects from a 100% faithful adaptation of the book then you aren't going to like this either.
Totally entertained and it never once felt like a 3 hour film.
It also has a great soundtrack, the reprise of which had me stay for the whole credits.
Have you ever had something really unfair happen to you?
Have you ever been betrayed by people you trusted?
Have you ever had the feeling of wanting to show them all and teach them a lesson?
Have you ever been mad with rage?
Have you ever thought that if you had the chance you would do so much good in the world?
Have you ever wondered about what cost your actions and words have on other people far out in the future?
Have you ever been consumed with an idea you wouldn't separate from?
Have you ever held onto someone even though they moved on?
Have you ever had your life fall apart?
Have you ever convinced yourself that you were right, only to learn that you were wrong?
If you can say yes to just one of these things. This movie is for you. A masterpiece. I sat with profound feelings of mercy and grace towards myself and others after watching this movie.
Have you ever been betrayed by people you trusted?
Have you ever had the feeling of wanting to show them all and teach them a lesson?
Have you ever been mad with rage?
Have you ever thought that if you had the chance you would do so much good in the world?
Have you ever wondered about what cost your actions and words have on other people far out in the future?
Have you ever been consumed with an idea you wouldn't separate from?
Have you ever held onto someone even though they moved on?
Have you ever had your life fall apart?
Have you ever convinced yourself that you were right, only to learn that you were wrong?
If you can say yes to just one of these things. This movie is for you. A masterpiece. I sat with profound feelings of mercy and grace towards myself and others after watching this movie.
The first question I'd love to ask directors adapting novels to movies is: if that book inspired you so much that you wanted to make a movie out of it, why then alter its story?
The Count of Montecristo is another of those cases: those who read the book will be astounded by how the ending was completely distorted; and for no evident reason I'd submit, as the book's ending was dramatic enough.
So, again, if you didn't like it, why make a movie about it? If you want to ride your own ideas by all means do that, use your fantasy and in that case the sky will be the limit.
OK, end of runt...If I had to disconnect my literary memory and judge the movie for its sheer cinematographic merits, The Count of Montecristo is a honest cloak and dagger movie, with good performances by all the key actors, good photography and decent pace.
But then again, my literary memory kicks in again and a bittersweet aftertaste lingers in my mouth...
The Count of Montecristo is another of those cases: those who read the book will be astounded by how the ending was completely distorted; and for no evident reason I'd submit, as the book's ending was dramatic enough.
So, again, if you didn't like it, why make a movie about it? If you want to ride your own ideas by all means do that, use your fantasy and in that case the sky will be the limit.
OK, end of runt...If I had to disconnect my literary memory and judge the movie for its sheer cinematographic merits, The Count of Montecristo is a honest cloak and dagger movie, with good performances by all the key actors, good photography and decent pace.
But then again, my literary memory kicks in again and a bittersweet aftertaste lingers in my mouth...
I read the books and saw two other versions of it as a film.
I asked myself what was the idea to make another version even though 18 exist already.
I watched it in French and realized that it is pretty far off the original storyline. Some characters are missing and others adapted. Apart from the great costumes and the brilliant locations, it seemed to me that only the beautiful, 'rich' sides were shown. The prison seemed too romanticised to me, as did the society. The Count could hardly stand out from the others due to his wealth and mystique, because this didn't always come to the surface.
Nevertheless, the film is entertaining and I was never bored. It managed to tell the whole story, although in a different way. Unfortunately, I couldn't answer the question of why this film was made, because it's just another version.
Watch the film if you don't know the story yet and like a romanticised story. Otherwise, I recommend the book by Alexandre Dumas and the film 'The Count of Monte Cristo 2002'.
I asked myself what was the idea to make another version even though 18 exist already.
I watched it in French and realized that it is pretty far off the original storyline. Some characters are missing and others adapted. Apart from the great costumes and the brilliant locations, it seemed to me that only the beautiful, 'rich' sides were shown. The prison seemed too romanticised to me, as did the society. The Count could hardly stand out from the others due to his wealth and mystique, because this didn't always come to the surface.
Nevertheless, the film is entertaining and I was never bored. It managed to tell the whole story, although in a different way. Unfortunately, I couldn't answer the question of why this film was made, because it's just another version.
Watch the film if you don't know the story yet and like a romanticised story. Otherwise, I recommend the book by Alexandre Dumas and the film 'The Count of Monte Cristo 2002'.
Usually not a fan of action movies, the wonderful cast as well as the choice of a classic of French literature convinced me to go watch LE COMTE DE MONTE CRISTO. And man I wasn't disappointed !
Despite its three-hour runtime, the movie never bores. When it doesn't keep us on our toes, it shows us eye-popping scenes of 19th century France, leaving us wondering how they made that with only 40M euros ! I guess the beautiful cinematography and clever editing have a role to play in making this movie stand out from much costlier Hollywood productions.
Of course much of the credit also goes to Alexandre Dumas for coming up with such a poignant story, but adapting it for the screen sure wasn't an easy task either, and it was done marvelously here.
I sincerely hope this movie will have a career outside of France, as more people deserve to see this.
Merci Alexandre, merci Matthieu :)
Despite its three-hour runtime, the movie never bores. When it doesn't keep us on our toes, it shows us eye-popping scenes of 19th century France, leaving us wondering how they made that with only 40M euros ! I guess the beautiful cinematography and clever editing have a role to play in making this movie stand out from much costlier Hollywood productions.
Of course much of the credit also goes to Alexandre Dumas for coming up with such a poignant story, but adapting it for the screen sure wasn't an easy task either, and it was done marvelously here.
I sincerely hope this movie will have a career outside of France, as more people deserve to see this.
Merci Alexandre, merci Matthieu :)
Lo sapevi?
- QuizWith a budget estimated in EUR42.9 million, The Count of Monte Cristo is the most expensive French film of 2024.
- BlooperWhen Albert watches Hydee sing and play the guitar, it is very obvious that she is not even touching the strings half of the time.
- Citazioni
Danglars: The story makes no sense. We're swimming in madness. My boats were still in Marseilles yesterday. I will need a delay to pay you back. If...
Edmond Dantès: You have nothing left, Baron. Everything that was yours is now mine. The only thing you have left are these clothes. Leave Paris, and perhaps I will not let your wife and your daughter starve.
Danglars: But, Count, I...
Edmond Dantès: Do you find me brutal, Baron? "Not only do I know it, but I take pride in it." You should escort your wife home. She looks quite pale.
- ConnessioniFeatured in La grande semaine: Episodio #1.13 (2024)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Count of Monte-Cristo?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Il conte di Montecristo
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 42.900.000 € (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 529.830 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 17.426 USD
- 22 dic 2024
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 78.625.657 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 58min(178 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti