Tatami - Una donna in lotta per la libertà

This is determination: you're competing in the World Judo Championships. You go to the weigh-in and find you're .3 kg over. Leila Hosseini (Arienne Mandi), the Iranian national champion, has 20 minutes to lose the extra weight. By pedaling furiously on a stationary bike, she manages that, plus a few additional ounces. The National Team's coach, Ms. Maryam Ghanbari (Zar Amir), has been in Leila's corner for years, pushing her successfully onward, and looks on proudly.

At the start of the third match, the Iranian Judo Association phones Ghanbari and orders her to have Hosseini throw her next fight. The political implications that she might possibly face the Israeli opponent, her friend, and lose to her in the finals, would disgrace Iran and the Supreme Leader won't stand for that.

Hosseini stands her ground. She's adamant that she deserves to win a gold medal, for herself, her family and her country. Yet she fears disobeying because it will certainly endanger her entire family.

Ghanbari has personally been down this road before, having her life controlled by the Islamic government. She's wound tightly, always touching her hijab, nervously checking to make sure not a single stray hair protrudes. The Supreme Leader of Iran goes so far as having Ghanbari's mother call to insist she tell Hosseini throw the match. This is what living under an oppressive regime means - total control.

Tatami is more than a movie about judo - it's a complex political thriller about facing down an insidious, oppressive government and saying 'no more'. Fighting for your life. Finding support when it's most needed, from like-minded individuals. The photography and lighting are used evocatively. Shot in black and white, the camera gets right into the faces, hands and feet of the combatants. The purposely ironic scripting of the commentator's observations mirrors the life-defining choices made by Hosseini.

The first feature film co-directed by Iranian and Israeli filmmakers Guy Nattiv and Zar Amir Ebrahimi, and an official selection of several international film festivals, Tatami is showing in select theaters.

When I started watching Tatami, I thought I knew what to expect. It felt like it might be a documentary, straightforward and predictable. But soon, the film surprised me, and its tone shifted to something intense and powerful. I quickly felt the characters' restrictions, especially how trapped the main character, Leila, was. The square aspect ratio-which I found odd at first-ended up being the perfect choice. It made the story feel tight and confined, letting me feel every bit of tension. I started noticing every shot and angle, each one adding to the atmosphere.

The movie gave me a new perspective on the struggles these athletes face. It's sad to think about, and it's even sadder to know that, whether it's just as we see in the film or what we sometimes see on the news, people actually live like this. It's heartbreaking how communities can be torn apart by politics and control. The film touched me deeply, exposing the sickness of a system that can manipulate and break people for its own ends.

It's a shame Tatami hasn't gotten more attention. With its unique style and powerful story, it deserves to be seen by more people. It isn't just a movie; it's a look into the lives of people whose stories often go unheard.

What makes 'Tatami' so captivating? It is an efficient thriller and intimately connects us with the main character.

A THRILLER SHOT LIKE A TRAGEDY

The movie follows the rules of classic tragedy:

• Unity of time: all actions occur in less than 24 hours, except the epilogue a year later and the flashbacks of course;
• Unity of space: the plot is mainly located in the Dojo of the World Championships. When we see the family in Iran, they are interacting by phone with Leila on site, with very few exceptions;
• Unity of action: the two stories, namely the competition and pressure from the regime, are closely intertwined.

The use of black and white increases the sense of classical format and tragedy, the former being enhanced by the "old" aspect ratio of 1.33 to 1, which is closer to a square than the more common 1.85 or 2.40. Overall it looks more like a film noir than a sports feature.

The action follows a downward slope where characters are increasingly threatened and unable to avoid their fate, as in a nightmare. The happy end is only relative: granted, Maryam, Leila and her son eventually live in France, yet we don't know what happened to Leila's husband and parents, as well as Maryam's mother. In the penultimate scene, both women are in a bus as they were in the first scene, a gripping loop since it seems nothing has changed whilst everything has. They look at each other and only vaguely smile: a bittersweet ending.

To increase the dramatic atmosphere, the movie deliberately aims for efficiency rather than accuracy as it takes many liberties with Judo standards. As such, it is not a film about Judo: sport is a background to the thriller.-

• The World Judo Association (WJA) does not exist, it is the International Judo Federation (IJF). Senior officials would not get involved so directly and at such short notice.-
• No Judo World Championships were ever staged in Tbilisi, where the film was shot: the actual environment (Dojo and streets of the city) is more important than historical accuracy.-
• The IJF does not allow wearing a hijab (headscarf) on the tatami for safety reasons, contrarily to some national or regional organisations; wearing a bonnet has occasionally been tolerated. This is bypassed by the movie in order to illustrate the clothing norms imposed to Iranian women: it provides a general dimension to the specific plot.-
• The rhythm of the competition is on the fast side. The World Championships are indeed held in one day for each weight category, with a maximum of 6 combats from round of 64 to the final. However they spread over hours to allow Judokas to recover from the effort and potential wounds, whilst the movie action almost seems to be in real time.-
• The fights are purposefully dramatized. Some techniques are practically unseen at this level, for instance Tomoe Nage for those who know Judo (the "attacker" falls on her back and projects the opponent over her), which a world-class Judoka could easily counter.-
• The Iranian federation and pundits react much too quickly to Leila's success: they intervene at the beginning of the competition, whilst it is absolutely not certain she will face the Israeli Judoka in the final. Actually related instructions would have been given ahead of the competition, but this would not have enabled the dramatic build-up.

AN INTIMATE CONNECTION

Most of all, we intimately share the main character's experience.-

• The image is generally dark with many shadows, echoing the feelings of the two main characters. The backgrounds are especially sombre, illustrating the looming threats.-
• Most of the action occurs inside and when it does not, exterior scenes are obscure: the overall sensation is claustrophobic and oppressive.-
• The above-mentioned narrow format of 1.33 increases this feeling of confinement.-
• The grain of the film is rather thick, as opposed to the usual smooth texture nowadays. It is as if we were touching the rugged Judogi uniform (improperly called "kimono") worn by the athletes, feeling the dense atmosphere, smelling the sweaty environment.-
• The fights are frequently shown close or very close, with fast camera movements and quick editing: we are on the tatami with Leila.-
• There are subjective shots where we see through Leila's eyes, for instance when her vision is blurred in the last combat.-
• All flashbacks are related to Leila: we visualise them with her. Some are intimate: a nude scene in bed with her husband, a sweet scene with her son in his bed. We follow her train of thoughts: the photograph flashes before a round evoke a powerful scene where she dances with her husband, among stroboscopic lights in a clandestine club (since her hair is loose).-

The movie depicts the emancipation of Leila who refuses to submit herself, symbolically removes her hijab in the last round and defects. Interestingly, she becomes an example for Maryam who, after complying, supports her, confesses to unduly forfeiting the 1988 Olympics and also defects: a reversed situation since Maryam has always been a model for Leila.

The plot is not strictly based on real facts: it is a compilation and dramatization of existing incidents. According to the diaspora site 'Radio Farda', the directors mentioned the following references:

• Saeid Mollaei, an Iranian male Judoka who was ordered to lose during the 2019 World Championships to avoid facing an Israeli in the final;
• Elnaz Rekabi, an Iranian female climber who appeared without hijab during the 2022 Asian Championships;
• Kimia Alizadeh, an Iranian female taekwondo athlete, who defected in 2020.

These events are condensed in the story of Leila. For memo the boycott of Israeli athletes is not specific to Iran or Judo; in Judo alone there were recently e.g. Fethi Nourine (Algerian) and Mohamed Abdalarasool (Sudanese) during the 2021 Olympics, as well as Messaoud Driss (Algerian) during the 2024 Olympics. Leila's exile also echoes co-director Zar Amir Ebrahimi's who plays the role of the coach Maryam and who was forced to leave Iran in 2008.

In summary, 'Tatami' is a compelling thriller with political, ethical and personal insights. It appropriately embodies the present repression by the Iranian regime of all its citizens, notably women. Ironically this oppression is not even efficient: the Israeli Judoka who could have faced Leila in the final eventually loses in semi-final. Hence if Leila had not been stressed by threats, she would have been more focused, could have passed the quarter-final stage, have won a medal for Iran and would not have defected. Note the final twist: in the ultimate scene, Leila as part of the Refugees Team faces an Iranian Judoka. Repression has turned against itself.

Long moments at the start of the movie are spent showing a bus ride. I think the idea is to set the bar low where thrills are concerned. The photography is in black and white, the aspect ratio is not wide, and for most of the movie everything is in shadows. Very dark, at least as screened at my local theater.

And there are only two major characters. One is a serious athlete out to follow her dream at all costs, even if her family life suffers somewhat. The motif is familiar from any number of biopics, but here it's overlaid by another priority that the athlete defies: She's Iranian and she dares to disobey her government. Her courage is a big element of the movie, so there's a second character, her trainer, who embodies the conflict, wondering what the right thing to do really is.

The sport involved is judo, and the heroine is being asked to take a fall in order not to have to compete against an Israeli. Something like that actually happened, but this isn't a retelling of the actual story. It might have more impact if it were, because as is the movie is incessantly telling us how evil an authoritarian government is from the writer's point of view, rather than letting us figure it out from true-life facts.

A judo match, however you photograph it, is unfortunately not easy to follow. The movie provides a sports commentator on the scene, whose voice-over helps us out somewhat. A mystery I never did solve is the timing of the dreaded match against the Israeli. The Iranians pressure their contestant as if it's coming up right away, but it turns out not to be the next match. How are these things decided? If you never know when your opponent is going to be an Israeli, why did the Iranians send her to the competition in the first place?

Before you can think too much about that, though, the movie sweeps you along-- as relentless as its heroine. And if there are no blue skies or comic relief or rooftop chases, you don't miss them.

... to fight? No parties to be found here (well political ones maybe) ... so no pun intended as always. I read a bit after I watched the movie and it seems this is not a real story overall, but the gist of it, the main points it brings across ... well they are more than true. Even more so for the trainer actress/character ... who seems to have had trouble with her country ... never a nice feeling if you want to call it that.

It it quite harrowing to really want to keep your spirits up ... to want to succeed for your country ... and the country constantly failing you ... more than that to be honest ... but you have to watch this quite harrowing movie to get what it does ... and where it goes ... the human will never dies ... but it can break .. will it happen here? And what does it mean for freedom and choosing your own destiny ... this is powerful stuff ... and it does not take prisoners ... literally ... well sort of. Well worth a watch to say the least.