Arctic Hollow

The only good thing about this movie is only the poster which is quite well done probably this included all the budget The film is weak, a large part of the film is shot in the dark, you don't understand what's happening, it shouldn't even be classified as science-fiction, horror, or adventure To create a good film you also need a script, a good story and cgi, vfx, sfx especially for this kind of sci-fi or horror film and even different settings that even give you the impression of sci-fi or horror And for the adventure category, you need different locations, trips, which could be generated on the computer anyway, even if they didn't travel, maybe even add a sci-fi horror setting.

I stumbled across this movie when I was searching for the 2018 movie Arctic. Being that I'm a sucker for movies that take place in the snowy elements I decided to give it a try knowing full well it is a lower budget indy film.

I didn't have a ton of expectations but was thoughorly entertained to be honest, haha. It's a monster movie but it's not gory or violent. It's more of a Jules Verne adventure film that has some heart to it. Don't get me wrong it has some tense moments and some jump scrares, but to me it's the overall advernture that kept me intrigued.

It's only 70 minutes, so it's not a long commitment. Again, I love films that take place in snowy isolation so that influences my rating.

DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME! You know, this movie had a great idea going for it. Sadly however, they missed the mark entirely. The video work wasn't great, used a lot of dark scenes. Seems like 90% of the movie was shot in the dark to try and skew the fact this is a horrible movie. They used CGI for firing a gun and pitiful sound effects for the gun. The acting was very...VERY sub par.

Wasn't a very long movie but what would/could you expect when I think a 10 year old wrote the script.

Don't know what their budget was for this movie, but they could have spared a bit more.

When you take into account that the main character/actor has only been in films since 2017 and has 12 under his belt, it stands to reason why it's as bad as it is.

Such a disappointment.

Just think of the things you could do with 5k. Here we have a movie that is basically filmed 90% in a dark basement so there is no spending on set design, or much of anything else.

The script and dialogue sequences are bad, plane rental is $1500, actors are friends of the writer/director and paid min wage. Not much else to spend the budget on. Oh, the shock ending, $1000 on cgi.

Movies like this should be reserved for a separate part of IMDB. Self funded, vanity projects or Indie categories so that expectations are super low before hand.

Not much else to write here, ended up watching at 2x speed and then switched to 4x. Not much time wasted.

And other such AMAZING one liners for this horror of an excuse got a movie. Like it has been said bwfore---it's DARK. Literally only ten minutes of this movie are clearly visible-8 minutes into he beginning and two minutes at the end. Everything else is just reddish light cave scenes of a hand or a foot, LITERALLY just absolutely pitch black scenes,and sometimes a headlamp shining on the opposite character's face. It was awful,and only made worse by the TERRIBLE acting and cheesy dialogue. Don't even get me started on the lady's father's theory of middle earth,but then it only being 40 or so miles into the 4000 miles to the center of the earth that life appears,and her belief that her father,who disappeared FIVE YEARS AGO is somehow still alive in nowhere earth. Just an all around dumpster fire stinker of a movie. It's too late for me I can't unsee this but you have a chance. Save yourself.