VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,7/10
5170
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
La rivale Angel Vergara, proprietaria di una boutique, sabota l'attività di cura della pelle di Hope Goldman. Con l'aiuto dell'amica Jordan, Hope cerca di scoprire chi sta tramando per rovin... Leggi tuttoLa rivale Angel Vergara, proprietaria di una boutique, sabota l'attività di cura della pelle di Hope Goldman. Con l'aiuto dell'amica Jordan, Hope cerca di scoprire chi sta tramando per rovinare la sua reputazione.La rivale Angel Vergara, proprietaria di una boutique, sabota l'attività di cura della pelle di Hope Goldman. Con l'aiuto dell'amica Jordan, Hope cerca di scoprire chi sta tramando per rovinare la sua reputazione.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Michaela Jaé (MJ) Rodriguez
- Marine
- (as Michaela Jaé Rodriguez)
Recensioni in evidenza
As a thriller, it needed to be...more thrilling. There really wasn't enough going on to elevate it above being a decent Lifetime movie, an episode of Nip/Tuck, or a concise hour-long rerun of Dateline with Keith Morrison narrating in his patented Canadian way. Or maybe, the other guy...Dennis whats-his-face. You know, the one with the moles and skin tags. Oh hey, he would have been a great choice for the reenactment of this movie.
But that is the problem with Skincare: it is just too safe and by-the-book. Even the lady that inspired the script said that the actual events were even crazier. And the film itself needed more style. Like literally 2020's horror offering The Stylist comes immediately to mind. There needed to be a central underlying metaphor. Something to do with the "ugliness" of the aesthetician profession. Something more than what was presented.
I don't know. It was fine. Just more ridiculousness would have been appreciated.
But that is the problem with Skincare: it is just too safe and by-the-book. Even the lady that inspired the script said that the actual events were even crazier. And the film itself needed more style. Like literally 2020's horror offering The Stylist comes immediately to mind. There needed to be a central underlying metaphor. Something to do with the "ugliness" of the aesthetician profession. Something more than what was presented.
I don't know. It was fine. Just more ridiculousness would have been appreciated.
Billed as a thriller, I was expecting a stalker type film reminiscent of something from the 80s. But the tone is really that of a dark comedy with some mystery added in.
Elizabeth Banks plays a business woman in the cosmetic industry on the verge of breakthrough success. After a competitor moves in down the street, Banks' character becomes the victim of ongoing and escalating harassment with the seeming goal of destroying her business. Refusing to be a victim, she decides to fight back.
A lot of potential in the premise and it did keep my interest throughout. Unfortunately, the reveal is anticlimactic and the film lacks a satisfying conclusion.
As I was leaving, I heard a man tell his girlfriend that he thought this felt like a made for Netflix film. Agreed.
Elizabeth Banks plays a business woman in the cosmetic industry on the verge of breakthrough success. After a competitor moves in down the street, Banks' character becomes the victim of ongoing and escalating harassment with the seeming goal of destroying her business. Refusing to be a victim, she decides to fight back.
A lot of potential in the premise and it did keep my interest throughout. Unfortunately, the reveal is anticlimactic and the film lacks a satisfying conclusion.
As I was leaving, I heard a man tell his girlfriend that he thought this felt like a made for Netflix film. Agreed.
This isn't the most complicated or intellectual thriller out there but it was surprisingly entertaining and enjoyable. I had seen a few negative soundbites out there, but there wasn't much in general given I saw one of the first screenings and I was trying to avoid reading much before watching. The soundtrack was great, some scenes had great camera play, and the way the story revolved around a small handful of characters was great -- the writing was good enough but the acting/characters was well done. Some things were very predictable but there were smaller twists and turns that made it fun. The only major irritation, common in some thrillers, was the outrageous stupidity/recklessness of the main chsracter, with some particularly dumb actions/writing. Not a must see by any means but fun and interesting enough to add to your list.
So the trailer peaked my curiosity and I downloaded to watch and it really started off ok. Elizabeth Banks has a beauty salon providing exquisite skincare service for her customers, ready to launch her own product line, when the competition shows up next door and coincidentally a loaded group email goes out to everyone she knows smearing her character, hurting the reputation of her business and the fallout of who's behind it begins. Everything leading up to her launch now spirals completely downward and her naive mindset has her looking in the wrong direction of who's trying to destroy her reputation. For a dark comedy it failed to deliver the way Drop Dead Gorgeous did with the late Kristie Alley o so well. Skincare was watchable but extremely forgettable popcorn.
Austin Peters' first feature film invites us to enter the world of skin care and a toxic narcissistic environment that is soaked in a pleasant dose of black humor, even when it makes horrible decisions.
It is a journey with ups and downs, but it is delivered by an inspired Elizabeth Banks who shines with her own light and carries on her shoulders, a thriller that in the cunning of her interpretation makes the darkest moments of the film shine; it is not that the film is flawed, it is quite acceptable and becomes pleasant as we enter into the deep intrigue that professes its story. However, there are moments in which the film is somewhat complicated in carrying out the whole journey well to reach its final climax.
The script does a great job of conveying the particularly feminine paranoia of its protagonist, but its plot doesn't quite fit together to keep it constantly on top without making certain decisions noticeable that end up taking away the power that it seems to carry with elegance at times.
Despite the script's limitations, it should not be completely discarded, especially because of the encouraging staging of its director, who demonstrates an elegant handling of visual aesthetics and complements his work with the gratifying photography of Christopher Ripley who manages to immerse this entire journey in a pleasant thriller that at times recalls that eighties style on screen that turns out to be quite gratifying.
A fulfilling film that has its moments that make it worthy of a chance.
It is a journey with ups and downs, but it is delivered by an inspired Elizabeth Banks who shines with her own light and carries on her shoulders, a thriller that in the cunning of her interpretation makes the darkest moments of the film shine; it is not that the film is flawed, it is quite acceptable and becomes pleasant as we enter into the deep intrigue that professes its story. However, there are moments in which the film is somewhat complicated in carrying out the whole journey well to reach its final climax.
The script does a great job of conveying the particularly feminine paranoia of its protagonist, but its plot doesn't quite fit together to keep it constantly on top without making certain decisions noticeable that end up taking away the power that it seems to carry with elegance at times.
Despite the script's limitations, it should not be completely discarded, especially because of the encouraging staging of its director, who demonstrates an elegant handling of visual aesthetics and complements his work with the gratifying photography of Christopher Ripley who manages to immerse this entire journey in a pleasant thriller that at times recalls that eighties style on screen that turns out to be quite gratifying.
A fulfilling film that has its moments that make it worthy of a chance.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis is Elizabeth Banks and Nathan Fillion's first collaboration since Slither (2006).
- BlooperHope claims her beauty products are copyrighted. An ingredient lists or recipe cannot be copyrighted. It could be patented if it involved a novel chemical or production method.
- Colonne sonoreYou Think I Ain't Worth a Dollar, But I Feel Like a Millionaire
Performed by Queens of the Stone Age
Written by Josh Homme (as Joshua Homme), Nick Oliveri, Mario Lalli
Courtesy of Interscope Records under license from Universal Music Enterprises
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Skincare?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 456.590 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 323.856 USD
- 18 ago 2024
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 456.590 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 36min(96 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti