Cinque anni dopo Jurassic World Dominion, una spedizione affronta regioni equatoriali isolate per estrarre il DNA da tre enormi creature preistoriche per una rivoluzionaria scoperta medica.Cinque anni dopo Jurassic World Dominion, una spedizione affronta regioni equatoriali isolate per estrarre il DNA da tre enormi creature preistoriche per una rivoluzionaria scoperta medica.Cinque anni dopo Jurassic World Dominion, una spedizione affronta regioni equatoriali isolate per estrarre il DNA da tre enormi creature preistoriche per una rivoluzionaria scoperta medica.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Dylan Bickel
- Brooklyn Pedestrian
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
PROS:
-The Cinematography is Spectacular!!!
-The T-Rex sequence is TERRIFYING!!!
-Heavy "Jaws" influence during the Mosasaur sequence.
-The Dinosaur effects are great.
CONS: -I'm really tired of mutants/hybrids in my Dinosaur Movies.
-Script tries to undo the fallout of "Fallen Kingdom/Dominion".
-All the characters feel like caricatures.
-The inclusion of an annoying family and a baby dino.
This was a frustrating experience. For every positive in the film, there was a corresponding negative. Gareth Edwards is always on point with cinematography and shot composition. The fact that this was shot on film was noticeable in a positive way. The visuals looked bright during the day, avoiding that blue-tinted filter most blockbusters use these days.
The Mosasaur and T-Rex sequences are actually thrilling, with the T-Rex being legitimately terrifying for the first time since "The Lost World". The effects for the dinosaurs were great, though I do miss the use of practical effects. What I don't miss is the inclusion of mutants and hybrids. I go to these movies to see dinosaurs, not monsters. There are plenty of other franchises for that. The Mutadons and D-Rex serve the same narrative purpose as the raptors (who got completely sidelined here) and the T-Rex. If they had simply swapped them out for those two in the third act, I'd have been much happier.
Also not helping were the characters. The family subplot could-and should-have been removed entirely. They add nothing to the story and waste screentime. The expedition team are all stereotypes, but Mahershala Ali at least stands out. Honestly, I think he would've been fantastic as the lead here instead of Scarlett Johansson.
All that said, I went in with no expectations and still found myself mildly entertained. I can't help but smile when the John Williams "Jurassic Park" score plays and it made a few welcome appearances here. This is definitely a 'paint-by-numbers' Jurassic movie, but I wouldn't be upset if Gareth Edwards got another chance to direct one. 7/10.
-The T-Rex sequence is TERRIFYING!!!
-Heavy "Jaws" influence during the Mosasaur sequence.
-The Dinosaur effects are great.
CONS: -I'm really tired of mutants/hybrids in my Dinosaur Movies.
-Script tries to undo the fallout of "Fallen Kingdom/Dominion".
-All the characters feel like caricatures.
-The inclusion of an annoying family and a baby dino.
This was a frustrating experience. For every positive in the film, there was a corresponding negative. Gareth Edwards is always on point with cinematography and shot composition. The fact that this was shot on film was noticeable in a positive way. The visuals looked bright during the day, avoiding that blue-tinted filter most blockbusters use these days.
The Mosasaur and T-Rex sequences are actually thrilling, with the T-Rex being legitimately terrifying for the first time since "The Lost World". The effects for the dinosaurs were great, though I do miss the use of practical effects. What I don't miss is the inclusion of mutants and hybrids. I go to these movies to see dinosaurs, not monsters. There are plenty of other franchises for that. The Mutadons and D-Rex serve the same narrative purpose as the raptors (who got completely sidelined here) and the T-Rex. If they had simply swapped them out for those two in the third act, I'd have been much happier.
Also not helping were the characters. The family subplot could-and should-have been removed entirely. They add nothing to the story and waste screentime. The expedition team are all stereotypes, but Mahershala Ali at least stands out. Honestly, I think he would've been fantastic as the lead here instead of Scarlett Johansson.
All that said, I went in with no expectations and still found myself mildly entertained. I can't help but smile when the John Williams "Jurassic Park" score plays and it made a few welcome appearances here. This is definitely a 'paint-by-numbers' Jurassic movie, but I wouldn't be upset if Gareth Edwards got another chance to direct one. 7/10.
Let's face it, this franchise always triumphs despite the criticism.
I think that since the original "Jurassic Park," none of the films have received good reviews, but they always have incredible box office returns.
After the disastrous previous trilogy, where the first part lived off nostalgia and reliving moments, and "Fallen Kingdom" and "Dominion" were complete narrative disasters, it was obvious we were getting a new film.
On the one hand, there are successes: the casting is excellent, with S. Johansson, M. Ali, and J. Bailey as the main trio. There's great chemistry, and it works well. On the other hand, G. Edwards' direction knows how to work well with blockbusters.
But on the other hand, there are major omissions, a somewhat absurd script that closely mimics "Jurassic Park 3." A family, if not, that we know will survive. Few deaths, which I think would have favored the narrative and improved the atmosphere. The CGI, while good, is far from the animatronics we fell in love with. Many sequences are homages/rip-offs that many will enjoy, while others won't.
Overall, I found the film entertaining. I think they're still exaggerating the hybrids and that the trailers had shown everything, including 100% of the dinosaurs that would appear.
Unfortunately, I think the franchise is closer to "Fast and Furious" than to Michael Crichton's books, and that's a shame.
I think that since the original "Jurassic Park," none of the films have received good reviews, but they always have incredible box office returns.
After the disastrous previous trilogy, where the first part lived off nostalgia and reliving moments, and "Fallen Kingdom" and "Dominion" were complete narrative disasters, it was obvious we were getting a new film.
On the one hand, there are successes: the casting is excellent, with S. Johansson, M. Ali, and J. Bailey as the main trio. There's great chemistry, and it works well. On the other hand, G. Edwards' direction knows how to work well with blockbusters.
But on the other hand, there are major omissions, a somewhat absurd script that closely mimics "Jurassic Park 3." A family, if not, that we know will survive. Few deaths, which I think would have favored the narrative and improved the atmosphere. The CGI, while good, is far from the animatronics we fell in love with. Many sequences are homages/rip-offs that many will enjoy, while others won't.
Overall, I found the film entertaining. I think they're still exaggerating the hybrids and that the trailers had shown everything, including 100% of the dinosaurs that would appear.
Unfortunately, I think the franchise is closer to "Fast and Furious" than to Michael Crichton's books, and that's a shame.
Five years after the mess that was Jurassic World: Dominion (2022), we're back in the land of toothy nostalgia. This time, an expedition heads into remote equatorial regions to extract DNA from three colossal prehistoric creatures in the name of a "groundbreaking medical breakthrough."
Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard are mercifully gone (finally), and in their place we get Scarlett Johansson, stepping in as the new face of the franchise for round seven of the Jurassic Park/World saga. Gareth Edwards takes the director's chair, and while he's always known how to stage a good spectacle, even his talents can't fully save this dino-soaked popcorn flick.
Let's talk visuals. There's certainly no shortage of giant set pieces and dinosaur mayhem-but when your dinosaurs look like glossy, overcooked cartoon rejects, all the action in the world can't make it feel real. Hollywood still hasn't learned that audiences are burnt out on soulless green-screen overloads, and the actors, forced to react to nothing, stumble through half-baked expressions of terror. You can practically see them wondering where the tennis ball on a stick went.
Character-wise, it's a wash. Most of them are either grating or entirely forgettable, spouting cringey, rapid-fire dialogue that exists solely to shuttle us from one set piece to the next. And while Rebirth does manage to attempt something new and different, it still feels like we're just circling the same prehistoric drain. It's entertaining, sure-but it just isn't that exciting.
That said, it's still a step up from Fallen Kingdom and Dominion, which isn't saying much, but at least it's something. At this point, though, it's time Universal grew a pair and gave us the R-rated, blood-splattered dinosaur horror epic we deserve-because the stakes never feel high when your carnivores are sanitized for mass consumption.
Here's hoping the next one finally evolves. But I'm not holding my breath. It's best to turn your brain off and enjoy this one for what it is.
6/10.
Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard are mercifully gone (finally), and in their place we get Scarlett Johansson, stepping in as the new face of the franchise for round seven of the Jurassic Park/World saga. Gareth Edwards takes the director's chair, and while he's always known how to stage a good spectacle, even his talents can't fully save this dino-soaked popcorn flick.
Let's talk visuals. There's certainly no shortage of giant set pieces and dinosaur mayhem-but when your dinosaurs look like glossy, overcooked cartoon rejects, all the action in the world can't make it feel real. Hollywood still hasn't learned that audiences are burnt out on soulless green-screen overloads, and the actors, forced to react to nothing, stumble through half-baked expressions of terror. You can practically see them wondering where the tennis ball on a stick went.
Character-wise, it's a wash. Most of them are either grating or entirely forgettable, spouting cringey, rapid-fire dialogue that exists solely to shuttle us from one set piece to the next. And while Rebirth does manage to attempt something new and different, it still feels like we're just circling the same prehistoric drain. It's entertaining, sure-but it just isn't that exciting.
That said, it's still a step up from Fallen Kingdom and Dominion, which isn't saying much, but at least it's something. At this point, though, it's time Universal grew a pair and gave us the R-rated, blood-splattered dinosaur horror epic we deserve-because the stakes never feel high when your carnivores are sanitized for mass consumption.
Here's hoping the next one finally evolves. But I'm not holding my breath. It's best to turn your brain off and enjoy this one for what it is.
6/10.
Holy cow! This is more abysmal than i thought would be. None of the actors give good performance. The plot is pathetic. No twists, surprise, addition of a 'family' as if we should care about a bunch of no-name actors with nothing to add to the plot. Hard to believe this is written by David koepp, a master in his own craft. The first flop of this franchise. Universal deserves every piece of criticism it is getting. Horrendous CGI is an added disaster for this slop. I had high expectations after the previous two garbage entries in this franchise but i never felt any excitement in the trailer so naturally the movie is even pathetic i thought it would be.
As a lifelong *Jurassic Park* fan, this one hurts.
**Jurassic World: Rebirth** is, without question, the weakest entry in the entire franchise. From a lifeless script to painfully hollow characters, it feels less like a sequel and more like a cheap cash grab riding the bones of a once-great legacy.
Even the addition of Scarlett Johansson (who deserves way better) couldn't inject life into this CGI-fueled mess. Her talent is completely wasted in a film that doesn't seem to know what story it wants to tell-or why it's telling it at all.
The dinosaurs look good, sure. But when you care more about a digital T-Rex than any human on screen, you know something's gone terribly wrong.
Final thought: if you're watching for nostalgia, rewatch *Jurassic Park (1993)*. This one is a fossil best left buried.
**Jurassic World: Rebirth** is, without question, the weakest entry in the entire franchise. From a lifeless script to painfully hollow characters, it feels less like a sequel and more like a cheap cash grab riding the bones of a once-great legacy.
Even the addition of Scarlett Johansson (who deserves way better) couldn't inject life into this CGI-fueled mess. Her talent is completely wasted in a film that doesn't seem to know what story it wants to tell-or why it's telling it at all.
The dinosaurs look good, sure. But when you care more about a digital T-Rex than any human on screen, you know something's gone terribly wrong.
Final thought: if you're watching for nostalgia, rewatch *Jurassic Park (1993)*. This one is a fossil best left buried.
New and Upcoming Sequels, Prequels, and Spin-Offs
New and Upcoming Sequels, Prequels, and Spin-Offs
Discover some of the most anticipated sequels, prequels, and spin-offs coming to theaters and streaming.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizScarlett Johansson has been a huge fan of the franchise ever since she was a child. She spent the last ten years before this film was announced trying to join the franchise, saying she would have been fine with appearing in one only to die in the first five minutes if it meant she could be part of it.
- BlooperThe massive Titanosaurs are somehow completely hidden in grass that is not even tall enough to cover the human characters.
- Citazioni
Dr. Henry Loomis: Survival is a long shot.
- ConnessioniFeatures Un milione di anni fa (1966)
- Colonne sonoreMovin' On Up
Written by Bobby Gillespie, Andrew Innes, Robert Young
Performed by Primal Scream
Courtesy of Reprise Records/Creation Records
Licensed by Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing/Sony Music Entertainment UK Limited
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- What characters return from the previous films?
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Jurassic World: El Renacer
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 180.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 286.125.575 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 92.016.065 USD
- 6 lug 2025
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 659.629.998 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 13 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti