Hollywood Con Queen

My. God. Could you calm down with the constant background music? It gives the sense of total overproduction and ends up making the whole experience feel low budget and desperate to seem modern and hip. Dynamics lack because the music tries to make the whole show feel like a constant climax. Feels like being talked down to as a viewer really.......................... Such a shame cause it's obviously an important story and made by someone who really tried to be thorough. And a bit too thorough too - very slow paced making you feel like they were desperate to stretch the story into as many episodes as possible.

I've watched three con documentaries on Apple TV+ (this one, plus "The Big Conn" and "Escape of Carlos Ghosn") and this is definitely the best of the three. The three-episode length is just about perfect. It's filled with enough intrigue, tension and surprises to keep you engaged, although some of the b-roll of the detective and reporter does get a bit repetitive. Still, by the end, it's enough to give you both sides of the story and allow you to make your own decision about the motivations of the con man. He is certainly an interesting character, definitely a narcissist and probably a psychopath, but someone who never actually ruins the lives of any of the victims. In fact, a lot of the people who get taken are lucky they weren't targeted by someone a lot more evil who could have bankrupted them and destroyed their lives (at least none of the ones who were featured in the documentary were financially ruined). In any case, this was an interesting series. If you watch and enjoy it, the other two mentioned above might also be of interest to you. And, if you want to get a little more out-there and watch a docudrama that's better than all three of these, watch WeCrashed, which is a fascinating study of a con man (and his wife) who are still out there committing the same nefarious deeds. It's a great watch.

This subject can hit a soft spot with some people that makes them review it unfairly and attempt to bring detraction to negative aspects of the film that really are not there. Because the reality is this film is bringing to light to an issue that does not start and stop with the main subject matter of this film. I was surprised how much the film makers were able to cover in the amount of time. Due credit to them, navigating a complex situation that has been traumatic for many.

The journalist takes the viewer on a journey of discovery and gives a very real personal account for their own experience. This is important to see that the impact is not confined to the victims and therefore a more accurate account of the true nature of the issue at hand.

It is an interesting story which purports to tell the audience how one audacious individual was able to impersonate and scam hundreds of individuals, but the author of the articles and book which the documentary is based upon gets caught up in trying to discover the motivation of the person who perpetuates the lies and crimes. People are hurt financially & psychologically by the scammer, but he isn't a tortured soul. He's a psychopath. Anyone who's been in a relationship with one knows how this ends. You can view the perpetrator through a sympathetic lens and never understand what's really going on. The depths of their depravity is beyond comprehension. Suffice to say evil exists.

I think the story can be a good lesson on scam awareness, making it worth watching. However, the nearly three-hour runtime felt unnecessarily long to me. The start of the first episode successfully hooked me, but the second episode suffered from repetitive dialogues, filler monologues and seemingly stretched expositions, which all came across to me as redundant.

Showing the efforts made to track down the scammer was intriguing, but I don't think that literally every single detail needs to be depicted so exhaustively. For example, in the second episode, there are many scenes of the journalist selfie style portrait video showing him monologuing to his phone. It's redundant because the journalist was already being interviewed by the film crew.

Towards the end, it felt weird because the journalist seemingly makes all this to be about himself.