Sfere aliene atterrano sul pianeta Terra distruggendo con facilità tutto ciò che incontrano sul loro cammino. Tocca a uno scienziato e al Presidente degli Stati Uniti trovare un modo per fer... Leggi tuttoSfere aliene atterrano sul pianeta Terra distruggendo con facilità tutto ciò che incontrano sul loro cammino. Tocca a uno scienziato e al Presidente degli Stati Uniti trovare un modo per fermare l'invasione aliena.Sfere aliene atterrano sul pianeta Terra distruggendo con facilità tutto ciò che incontrano sul loro cammino. Tocca a uno scienziato e al Presidente degli Stati Uniti trovare un modo per fermare l'invasione aliena.
Foto
Recensioni in evidenza
You can always spot a poorly made film lazy direction, weak screenwriting, and uninspired performances. Casual viewers might be fooled into giving it four stars, but those who truly understand cinema see the flaws immediately. From the very first scene, everything feels off flat cinematography, predictable dialogue, and a lack of artistic vision. A great film is more than just aesthetics and spectacle; it requires depth, intentional storytelling, and performances that breathe life into every frame. This one fails on all counts.
The problem with bad films isn't just technical flaws it's the absence of passion and originality. A director with a true vision knows how to craft tension, evoke emotion, and make every frame meaningful. When a movie lacks that, it becomes nothing more than a forgettable, soulless product. Some audiences might accept mediocrity, but for those who truly appreciate cinema, it's impossible to ignore when a film is nothing more than a hollow imitation of better works.
The problem with bad films isn't just technical flaws it's the absence of passion and originality. A director with a true vision knows how to craft tension, evoke emotion, and make every frame meaningful. When a movie lacks that, it becomes nothing more than a forgettable, soulless product. Some audiences might accept mediocrity, but for those who truly appreciate cinema, it's impossible to ignore when a film is nothing more than a hollow imitation of better works.
Don't waste your time watching this...
Bad script, bad acting (really bad), bad CGI. What more could you ask for?
I could only stomach this for 10 minutes, then bailed on it.
Never saw the Alien. Never saw the Rubicon.
I went back and re-watched "Aliens" just to get the taste of this thing out of my head.
Don't get it confused with Alien: Romulus which might be a better flick.
This movie should be up for a Grand Prize in this year's Golden Raspberry Awards.
I wouldn't be surprised if it swept those awards and took home a bushel of raspberries.
It's that bad. Honest.
Take a nap instead of watching this, it will be time better spent.
I could only stomach this for 10 minutes, then bailed on it.
Never saw the Alien. Never saw the Rubicon.
I went back and re-watched "Aliens" just to get the taste of this thing out of my head.
Don't get it confused with Alien: Romulus which might be a better flick.
This movie should be up for a Grand Prize in this year's Golden Raspberry Awards.
I wouldn't be surprised if it swept those awards and took home a bushel of raspberries.
It's that bad. Honest.
Take a nap instead of watching this, it will be time better spent.
I had been looking forward to watching this movie, but am now kicking myself for watching it!!! This movie so reminded me of the early SciFi channel's movies. It is that BAD!!! The title makes one think of the "Alien" franchise, but it is NOT about that. I am a Science Fiction buff, but I will NEVER watch another movie like this!!! Totally unworthy of Science Fiction!!! A decent cast, but an excruciating script and ABSOLUTELY POOR script, plus the misleading title, reels in viewers, to an ABSOLUTELY WASTE OF TIME!!! If you want to watch it after reading this review (my first) , be my guest, but I can guarantee you that you will be disappointed!!! If I could have rated it 0, I would have.
I will usually give a movie 20-30 minutes and that was a challenge with this one. I started it based on the Glamour Shots preview and if cream rises to the top this sunk quick. The B budget acting didn't have a chance with the cheesy script. I've seen four or five of these actors in other things and they did a lot better given the tools they had in those movies. This one just needed to be cleaned up from every corner because it had a decent story to be based on. In theory this story has been told multiple times but they did have a different twist with Rubicon. Overall it was a huge strike out.
I cannot believe Asylum got Michael Paré to play in this Alien Romulus copywrite infringement garbage. This studio has got to be breaking laws somehow by duping unsuspecting theater goers who may mistake this for the latest Alien movie Romulus, or even a newer one than that due to the "different" title "Rubicon" It is a crying shame that resources have to be wasted on trash from people who obviously have nothing to offer original in their lives but to steal others ideas and trash them so miserably. I couldn't get through just a few minutes in when I looked up the studio company and saw "Asylum" then I shut it off. Don't waste your time unless you have NOTHING else to watch at all.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAccording to the Exploding Helicopter website, Alien Rubicon features 13 exploding helicopters - the most ever seen in any one film.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Tulnukate rünnak
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 26min(86 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti