Aurora Teagarden Mysteries: Death at the Diner

Trying to use the Aurora Teagarden name to get more viewership was a terrible idea. The casting is atrocious, Ro and Sally don't have the chemistry with each other or anyone else and don't remotely resemble the characters we've grown to love (both in personality or looks... Since when is Ro 4" taller than Sally?). The stories are dull and predictable. Maybe had they written new characters completely separate from the old franchise it would have been okay. They come out with new mystery series' all the time, why steal from the old one and retrofit the story for no good reason but to piggyback off of the original success.

About as thrilling as watching the grass grow. The potential for an interesting mystery drama is here, but the casting is flawed. The young Aurora with her lack of talent along with her caked on makeup, grocery store red dye hair makes me wonder why a casting person selected her or the actress for Sally. They really ruined a decent mystery. Please replace casting who hired them. I use to look forward to the drama. Aida, the mystery club and the library shenanigans. The characters were good seasoned performers and now you have two unlikable weak and wrong for the parts leads. What were you thinking? These people couldn't be more unlike Auroa and Sally.

I have actually not watched a single of the previous movies in the franchise prior to sitting down and watching the 2024 movie "Aurora Teagarden Mysteries: Death at the Diner". So I didn't know what I was getting myself into here. Nor have I read a single of the books in the series, so I suppose writers Charlaine Harris and David B. Grelck had every opportunity to bedazzle me with this mystery.

Normally I am not overly keen on murder mysteries, and while "Aurora Teagarden Mysteries: Death at the Diner" didn't exactly win me over to become a fan of murder mysteries, I will say that the storyline in the movie was actually fair. It was a pretty straightforward script and storyline. Writers Charlaine Harris and David B. Grelck put together a watchable and fairly enjoyable script and storyline. However, I found that the narrative was pretty flat and complacent. There weren't really any thrills or any ups and downs along the way, which made for a somewhat monotonous viewing.

I think the only face on the cast list that I was familiar with was Marilu Henner. I will say, though, that the acting performances in the movie were actually good.

I am sure that fans of the books or murder mysteries in general will enjoy the movie a lot more than I did as a casual viewer.

My rating of director Jessica Harmon's 2024 movie "Aurora Teagarden Mysteries: Death at the Diner" lands on a four out of ten stars.

The third installment of the younger version of Aurora Teagarden adds something spicier for the saga. Not only the murder happens inside the Diner where Aurora works and the killed one is her boss, but also the first suspect is her current boyfriend Daniel. So Aurora will have to fight harder than before to solve the mystery and also face a not so favorable Arthur in trying to prove Daniel's innocence.

I think that, while the best out of these 3 movies of the rebooted series is the second one, this third movie is still interesting and entertaining. The cast now is all even more fit into the characters and this improves a lot the story, the plot is twisted as per usual and we see more about Aurora's love life. And as I said before, the love triangle with Daniel and Arthur is not boring and too much at the centre of the story, it only adds positive drama in the crime solving process.

So I hope there will be other movies in 2025 of Aurora Teagarden with Skyler Samuels, now she is fully into her character and keeps doing good. Great series much fun.

The rebooted Aurora Teagarden series shows some questionable showrunning choices. Casting is a big one. The newcomers lack the charm of the prior cast in general. But this episode suffers from other problems, and the biggest one is that it's boring from the start.

We open with a murder. Okay. But there's nothing much to see. Nothing raises questions, other than who was murdered. We're also given no information on why we should care. Then it's a rewind to see a bit of bland backstory until we catch up with our murder again. Everything so far has only provided evidence that DEATH AT THE DINER is weak on storytelling.

We did have a murder, so that proves the title is accurate at least. But does anything else interesting happen? Unfortunately, the episode doesn't improve after that and we end up with a dull slog all the way through until the end when the murderer is revealed. If viewers haven't fallen asleep by then, that is.