Un ispettore immobiliare che lavora in Inghilterra in un antico maniero georgiano apre accidentalmente un portale sul suo passato settecentesco e sul suo affascinante proprietario di allora.Un ispettore immobiliare che lavora in Inghilterra in un antico maniero georgiano apre accidentalmente un portale sul suo passato settecentesco e sul suo affascinante proprietario di allora.Un ispettore immobiliare che lavora in Inghilterra in un antico maniero georgiano apre accidentalmente un portale sul suo passato settecentesco e sul suo affascinante proprietario di allora.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Foto
Recensioni in evidenza
There is a bit of whimsical time warping, but it is mildly plausible and I do love the action that required that the characters breach the barrier.
I found both of the leads quite believable. There are a couple of tricks borrowed from other time related tales, but I found them to be quite fittingly used. I found this to be a very enjoyable film and I loved the character development of the Gardner very much.
I did not expect the ending but was very pleasantly surprised. If you are interested in a cute little fantasy that has a happy ending then get a snack and something to drink because this is it!
I did wonder where Charles got money while he was stuck in the present.
This movie reminds me of Kate and Leopold which was a feature film with more well known actors many years ago. And Hallmark did a similar story A Timeless Christmas which also used the Moon as a key to the time travel.
I was glad that this movie avoided putting the main characters in crazy situations trying to cover their secret. The story mostly avoids scenes where a lot explaining was required to cover the secret. I was also glad that the leads didn't start out with the usual blatant antagonism. And I was glad Chelsea's boss wasn't overbearing with constant interruptions.
There is some discussion amongst characters about time travel paradoxes but not a lot of geeky talk.
I think some viewers will find the movie a bit slow at times. It tries to make up for it with making the relationship appealing.
Aubrey Reynolds and Toby-Alexander Smith had some chemistry but not quite sizzling The acting was mostly OK. The Quinn character was supposed to be weird and quirky. The dialogue is also OK but not sparkling.
You can tell it was written with the Hallmark Channel in mind-it's wholesome, light, and wraps everything up with a neat little bow. Nothing groundbreaking, but sometimes that's exactly what you want after a long day.
If you're in the mood for something feel-good with a bit of heart and don't mind a little cheesy romance, this one's worth the watch.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe male lead is called Sir Charles, V. If this title is associated with knighthood, it is not inherited. However, the title of baronet, also styled "Sir," can be inherited. So if his ancestor were a baronet, it would be appropriate to address Charles as Sir. Otherwise, it would not. If this is clarified in the film, I missed it, which would be my own shortcoming.
- BlooperThe man from 1799 crosses into the 21st century and interacts with people and environments without showing any signs of illness. In reality, he would have no immunity to modern bacteria and viruses, many of which evolved long after his time. Without vaccinations, prior exposure, or modern medical care, he would likely fall seriously ill or die within days from infections that are mild or manageable for present-day people.
- Citazioni
Chelsea Grayson: It's not every day I meet Mr. Darcy.
Charles Barkley V: Barkley
[corrects her]
Charles Barkley V: Charles Barkley V
Chelsea Grayson: Yes, I know, sorry. Mr. Darcy is someone known for being handsome and charming, sort of.
Charles Barkley V: You think me handsome?
I più visti
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- El amor a través del tiempo
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora
- Colore