AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
3,8/10
9,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Num esforço para evitar pagar uma enorme dívida de jogo a um notório mafioso na Inglaterra, um casal foge para Los Angeles e choca um esquema de roubo de joias.Num esforço para evitar pagar uma enorme dívida de jogo a um notório mafioso na Inglaterra, um casal foge para Los Angeles e choca um esquema de roubo de joias.Num esforço para evitar pagar uma enorme dívida de jogo a um notório mafioso na Inglaterra, um casal foge para Los Angeles e choca um esquema de roubo de joias.
Richard Alan Reid
- Bell Boy
- (as Richard Reid)
Philip Pavel
- Hotel Manager
- (as Phil Pavel)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
There's a great script here struggling to get out. Alas, it fails to even open the door.
Writer/director! When will producers learn!? I'm guessing Never so we continue to be plagued by these half-a**ed screenplays that desperately need a 2nd or 3rd eye to curb the writer's sense of brilliance! (That's irony for our American friends.)
Let's start with the title. It's not a movie about a con. Jesus! C'mon guys, at least get the terminology right. It's more a sort of comedy caper/heist movie, but it's not even that.
The worst character by far is Tim Roth's Peter. No doubt Roth enjoyed playing him although it would be as challenging as waking up in the morning. He's so lacking in couth it's absolutely impossible to imagine he could ever have gotten involved with Alice Eve or Uma Thurman, zany and cracked though their characters may be.
Maggie Q must have had a similar challenge with her character.
Highlight of the movie is Stephen Fry playing, well, Stephen Fry's "Dear boy" character, but he does it so naturally and so well. Although not a major character he does help redeem it from the pit.
It's not totally unwatchable. Well, if you're looking for a good plot or well-defined characters or well, anything, then it is...
Okay, it has good production values and a stellar cast but they're simply wasted, wasted, wasted.
I didn't think it was quite as bad as other reviews suggest which I find hard to believe! But it is extremely disappointing.
Writer/director! When will producers learn!? I'm guessing Never so we continue to be plagued by these half-a**ed screenplays that desperately need a 2nd or 3rd eye to curb the writer's sense of brilliance! (That's irony for our American friends.)
Let's start with the title. It's not a movie about a con. Jesus! C'mon guys, at least get the terminology right. It's more a sort of comedy caper/heist movie, but it's not even that.
The worst character by far is Tim Roth's Peter. No doubt Roth enjoyed playing him although it would be as challenging as waking up in the morning. He's so lacking in couth it's absolutely impossible to imagine he could ever have gotten involved with Alice Eve or Uma Thurman, zany and cracked though their characters may be.
Maggie Q must have had a similar challenge with her character.
Highlight of the movie is Stephen Fry playing, well, Stephen Fry's "Dear boy" character, but he does it so naturally and so well. Although not a major character he does help redeem it from the pit.
It's not totally unwatchable. Well, if you're looking for a good plot or well-defined characters or well, anything, then it is...
Okay, it has good production values and a stellar cast but they're simply wasted, wasted, wasted.
I didn't think it was quite as bad as other reviews suggest which I find hard to believe! But it is extremely disappointing.
I can't figure out what the purpose of this movie was or what it was trying to do. I don't know if it was attempting to display overacting on purpose as a parody of itself or if they were actually trying to be serious. Whatever it was it failed miserably. The result was an awkward movie that I had a hard time watching. It was caught in between something and something else. Very strange that they would even release this the way it turned out. They should have saved themselves some embarrassment and just shoved this one into the archives. It was absolutely terrible on all fronts. Not one good thing I can even think to say about this movie (well maybe that every scene didn't have them smoking fake cigarettes like a lot of others are doing these days) and I'm being generous. This is Hollywood at it's worst but hey, they've been doing a lot of this kind of garbage lately so this is nothing new. This is one of those flicks that almost makes me want to stop wasting my time watching movies. Luckily there are still some decent ones around but this is not one of them. Now I need to go find some deodorizer to get rid of the stink that is still in my nose. What is that smell anyway?
The con is on is by far the worst movie of 2018 don't waste your time and your money on this movie bad screenplay , bad directing , and so on but surprisingly great cast of actors and good performances
I hope this cast would have done different movie
Where to begin. The opening credits were lifted from Catch Me if You Can and Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. It fails to capture the essence of either.
Within the first 10 minutes of the movie, half of which are title sequence, you become quickly aware that the editing was created by Stevie Wonder's stand in, Blind Freddie.
Blind Freddie is actually only 10 years old and suffers from narcolepsy, evidence of which can be seen in the panning shots which are supposed to create a segway to the next scene but linger way too long.
The acting is, for the want of a better term, dire. It is quite clear that most of the actors are low on cash and have done a turn for a quick injection in their pocket books, which only helps to seal the fate of this abomination.
I liked most of the actors in this movie prior to seeing it, now their credibility along with my admiration have dispersed quicker than a whale turd.
Whoever suggested this is a movie to stick at an enjoy, or the viewer has to work to enjoy, must be from the cast, crew, family or financiers. Truly awful suggestion.
This is a complete train wreck of a movie. Great cast phoning in their performances, presumably for the money. It's taken three years since it was made for it to be released. They shouldn't have bothered.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe film completed filming in 2015, but took three years to receive a theatrical release.
- Erros de gravaçãoThey are in room #64, but there are only 63 rooms in the Chateau Marmont.
- ConexõesReferences Cães de Aluguel (1992)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Con is On?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- The Con is On
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 13.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 221.359
- Tempo de duração1 hora 35 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente